summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2023-01-31cpuidle: tracing, preempt: Squash _rcuidle tracingPeter Zijlstra
Extend/fix commit: 9aedeaed6fc6 ("tracing, hardirq: No moar _rcuidle() tracing") ... to also cover trace_preempt_{on,off}() which were mysteriously untouched. Fixes: 9aedeaed6fc6 ("tracing, hardirq: No moar _rcuidle() tracing") Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Y9D5AfnOukWNOZ5q@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y9jWXKgkxY5EZVwW@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2023-01-13tracing, hardirq: No moar _rcuidle() tracingPeter Zijlstra
Robot reported that trace_hardirqs_{on,off}() tickle the forbidden _rcuidle() tracepoint through local_irq_{en,dis}able(). For 'sane' configs, these calls will only happen with RCU enabled and as such can use the regular tracepoint. This also means it's possible to trace them from NMI context again. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230112195541.477416709@infradead.org
2023-01-13tracing: Remove trace_hardirqs_{on,off}_caller()Peter Zijlstra
Per commit 56e62a737028 ("s390: convert to generic entry") the last and only callers of trace_hardirqs_{on,off}_caller() went away, clean up. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230112195541.355283994@infradead.org
2022-09-06tracing: hold caller_addr to hardirq_{enable,disable}_ipYipeng Zou
Currently, The arguments passing to lockdep_hardirqs_{on,off} was fixed in CALLER_ADDR0. The function trace_hardirqs_on_caller should have been intended to use caller_addr to represent the address that caller wants to be traced. For example, lockdep log in riscv showing the last {enabled,disabled} at __trace_hardirqs_{on,off} all the time(if called by): [ 57.853175] hardirqs last enabled at (2519): __trace_hardirqs_on+0xc/0x14 [ 57.853848] hardirqs last disabled at (2520): __trace_hardirqs_off+0xc/0x14 After use trace_hardirqs_xx_caller, we can get more effective information: [ 53.781428] hardirqs last enabled at (2595): restore_all+0xe/0x66 [ 53.782185] hardirqs last disabled at (2596): ret_from_exception+0xa/0x10 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220901104515.135162-2-zouyipeng@huawei.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c3bc8fd637a96 ("tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage") Signed-off-by: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2022-04-05lockdep: Fix -Wunused-parameter for _THIS_IP_Nick Desaulniers
While looking into a bug related to the compiler's handling of addresses of labels, I noticed some uses of _THIS_IP_ seemed unused in lockdep. Drive by cleanup. -Wunused-parameter: kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1383:22: warning: unused parameter 'ip' kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4246:48: warning: unused parameter 'ip' kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4844:19: warning: unused parameter 'ip' Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220314221909.2027027-1-ndesaulniers@google.com
2020-09-14lockdep: fix order in trace_hardirqs_off_caller()Sven Schnelle
Switch order so that locking state is consistent even if the IRQ tracer calls into lockdep again. Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
2020-06-11x86/entry: Rename trace_hardirqs_off_prepare()Peter Zijlstra
The typical pattern for trace_hardirqs_off_prepare() is: ENTRY lockdep_hardirqs_off(); // because hardware ... do entry magic instrumentation_begin(); trace_hardirqs_off_prepare(); ... do actual work trace_hardirqs_on_prepare(); lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(); instrumentation_end(); ... do exit magic lockdep_hardirqs_on(); which shows that it's named wrong, rename it to trace_hardirqs_off_finish(), as it concludes the hardirq_off transition. Also, given that the above is the only correct order, make the traditional all-in-one trace_hardirqs_off() follow suit. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200529213321.415774872@infradead.org
2020-05-19lockdep: Prepare for noinstr sectionsPeter Zijlstra
Force inlining and prevent instrumentation of all sorts by marking the functions which are invoked from low level entry code with 'noinstr'. Split the irqflags tracking into two parts. One which does the heavy lifting while RCU is watching and the final one which can be invoked after RCU is turned off. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200505134100.484532537@linutronix.de
2020-05-19tracing: Provide lockdep less trace_hardirqs_on/off() variantsThomas Gleixner
trace_hardirqs_on/off() is only partially safe vs. RCU idle. The tracer core itself is safe, but the resulting tracepoints can be utilized by e.g. BPF which is unsafe. Provide variants which do not contain the lockdep invocation so the lockdep and tracer invocations can be split at the call site and placed properly. This is required because lockdep needs to be aware of the state before switching away from RCU idle and after switching to RCU idle because these transitions can take locks. As these code pathes are going to be non-instrumentable the tracer can be invoked after RCU is turned on and before the switch to RCU idle. So for these new variants there is no need to invoke the rcuidle aware tracer functions. Name them so they match the lockdep counterparts. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200505134100.270771162@linutronix.de
2019-02-13kprobes: Prohibit probing on hardirq tracersMasami Hiramatsu
Since kprobes breakpoint handling involves hardirq tracer, probing these functions cause breakpoint recursion problem. Prohibit probing on those functions. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/154998802073.31052.17255044712514564153.stgit@devbox Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-08-10tracing: More reverting of "tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and ↵Steven Rostedt (VMware)
unify their usage" Joel Fernandes created a nice patch that cleaned up the duplicate hooks used by lockdep and irqsoff latency tracer. It made both use tracepoints. But the latency tracer is triggering warnings when using tracepoints to call into the latency tracer's routines. Mainly, they can be called from NMI context. If that happens, then the SRCU may not work properly because on some architectures, SRCU is not safe to be called in both NMI and non-NMI context. This is a partial revert of the clean up patch c3bc8fd637a9 ("tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage") that adds back the direct calls into the latency tracer. It also only calls the trace events when not in NMI. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180809210654.622445925@goodmis.org Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Fixes: c3bc8fd637a9 ("tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2018-08-10tracing: Partial revert of "tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and ↵Steven Rostedt (VMware)
unify their usage" Joel Fernandes created a nice patch that cleaned up the duplicate hooks used by lockdep and irqsoff latency tracer. It made both use tracepoints. But it caused lockdep to trigger several false positives. We have not figured out why yet, but removing lockdep from using the trace event hooks and just call its helper functions directly (like it use to), makes the problem go away. This is a partial revert of the clean up patch c3bc8fd637a9 ("tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage") that adds direct calls for lockdep, but also keeps most of the clean up done to get rid of the horrible preprocessor if statements. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180806155058.5ee875f4@gandalf.local.home Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Fixes: c3bc8fd637a9 ("tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2018-07-31tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usageJoel Fernandes (Google)
This patch detaches the preemptirq tracepoints from the tracers and keeps it separate. Advantages: * Lockdep and irqsoff event can now run in parallel since they no longer have their own calls. * This unifies the usecase of adding hooks to an irqsoff and irqson event, and a preemptoff and preempton event. 3 users of the events exist: - Lockdep - irqsoff and preemptoff tracers - irqs and preempt trace events The unification cleans up several ifdefs and makes the code in preempt tracer and irqsoff tracers simpler. It gets rid of all the horrific ifdeferry around PROVE_LOCKING and makes configuration of the different users of the tracepoints more easy and understandable. It also gets rid of the time_* function calls from the lockdep hooks used to call into the preemptirq tracer which is not needed anymore. The negative delta in lines of code in this patch is quite large too. In the patch we introduce a new CONFIG option PREEMPTIRQ_TRACEPOINTS as a single point for registering probes onto the tracepoints. With this, the web of config options for preempt/irq toggle tracepoints and its users becomes: PREEMPT_TRACER PREEMPTIRQ_EVENTS IRQSOFF_TRACER PROVE_LOCKING | | \ | | \ (selects) / \ \ (selects) / TRACE_PREEMPT_TOGGLE ----> TRACE_IRQFLAGS \ / \ (depends on) / PREEMPTIRQ_TRACEPOINTS Other than the performance tests mentioned in the previous patch, I also ran the locking API test suite. I verified that all tests cases are passing. I also injected issues by not registering lockdep probes onto the tracepoints and I see failures to confirm that the probes are indeed working. This series + lockdep probes not registered (just to inject errors): [ 0.000000] hard-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] soft-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/12:FAILED|FAILED| ok | [ 0.000000] sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/21:FAILED|FAILED| ok | [ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + irqs-on/12:FAILED|FAILED| ok | [ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + irqs-on/12:FAILED|FAILED| ok | [ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + irqs-on/21:FAILED|FAILED| ok | [ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + irqs-on/21:FAILED|FAILED| ok | [ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123: ok | ok | ok | With this series + lockdep probes registered, all locking tests pass: [ 0.000000] hard-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] soft-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/12: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + irqs-on/12: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + irqs-on/12: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + irqs-on/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + irqs-on/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123: ok | ok | ok | Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180730222423.196630-4-joel@joelfernandes.org Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>