| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
test_number_prefix()
A recent change in clang allows it to consider more expressions as
compile time constants, which causes it to point out an implicit
conversion in the scanf tests:
lib/test_scanf.c:661:2: warning: implicit conversion from 'int' to 'unsigned char' changes value from -168 to 88 [-Wconstant-conversion]
661 | test_number_prefix(unsigned char, "0xA7", "%2hhx%hhx", 0, 0xa7, 2, check_uchar);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lib/test_scanf.c:609:29: note: expanded from macro 'test_number_prefix'
609 | T result[2] = {~expect[0], ~expect[1]}; \
| ~ ^~~~~~~~~~
1 warning generated.
The result of the bitwise negation is the type of the operand after
going through the integer promotion rules, so this truncation is
expected but harmless, as the initial values in the result array get
overwritten by _test() anyways. Add an explicit cast to the expected
type in test_number_prefix() to silence the warning. There is no
functional change, as all the tests still pass with GCC 13.1.0 and clang
18.0.0.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linuxq/issues/1899
Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/610ec954e1f81c0e8fcadedcd25afe643f5a094e
Suggested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230807-test_scanf-wconstant-conversion-v2-1-839ca39083e1@kernel.org
|
|
It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary
on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do
not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have
different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines.
This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one
function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack
frame for no actual good reason.
We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots
(see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on
by default these days, iirc).
So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we
end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size
warnings (now errors):
lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’:
lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
530 | }
| ^
lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’:
lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
488 | }
| ^
lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’:
lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
437 | }
| ^
In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to
just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions.
That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and
they aren't active all at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
|
|
UBSAN reported (via LKP)
[ 11.021349][ T1] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in lib/test_scanf.c:275:51
[ 11.022782][ T1] shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'unsigned int'
When n_bits == 0, the shift is out of range. Switch code to use GENMASK
to handle this case.
Fixes: 50f530e176ea ("lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210727150132.28920-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
|
|
Fix some spelling mistakes in comments found by "codespell":
thats ==> that's
unitialized ==> uninitialized
panicing ==> panicking
sucess ==> success
possitive ==> positive
intepreted ==> interpreted
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210607133036.12525-2-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> [test_bfp.c]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
sparse was producing warnings of the form:
sparse: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff0001 becomes 1)
There is no actual problem here. Using type_min() on an unsigned type
results in an (expected) truncation.
However, there is no need to test an unsigned value against type_min().
The minimum value of an unsigned is obviously 0, and any value cast to
an unsigned type is >= 0, so for unsigneds only type_max() need be tested.
This patch also takes the opportunity to clean up the implementation of
simple_numbers_loop() to use a common pattern for the positive and
negative test.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210525122012.6336-2-rf@opensource.cirrus.com
|
|
Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as
number conversion was previously broken.
This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from
vsprintf.c.
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com
|
