summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm/memcontrol.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-04-10mm, memcg: do not high throttle allocators based on wraparoundJakub Kicinski
If a cgroup violates its memory.high constraints, we may end up unduly penalising it. For example, for the following hierarchy: A: max high, 20 usage A/B: 9 high, 10 usage A/C: max high, 10 usage We would end up doing the following calculation below when calculating high delay for A/B: A/B: 10 - 9 = 1... A: 20 - PAGE_COUNTER_MAX = 21, so set max_overage to 21. This gets worse with higher disparities in usage in the parent. I have no idea how this disappeared from the final version of the patch, but it is certainly Not Good(tm). This wasn't obvious in testing because, for a simple cgroup hierarchy with only one child, the result is usually roughly the same. It's only in more complex hierarchies that things go really awry (although still, the effects are limited to a maximum of 2 seconds in schedule_timeout_killable at a maximum). [chris@chrisdown.name: changelog] Fixes: e26733e0d0ec ("mm, memcg: throttle allocators based on ancestral memory.high") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [5.4.x] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200331152424.GA1019937@chrisdown.name Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-07mm: use fallthrough;Joe Perches
Convert the various /* fallthrough */ comments to the pseudo-keyword fallthrough; Done via script: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/b56602fcf79f849e733e7b521bb0e17895d390fa.1582230379.git.joe@perches.com/ Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/f62fea5d10eb0ccfc05d87c242a620c261219b66.camel@perches.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-07mm, memcg: bypass high reclaim iteration for cgroup hierarchy rootChris Down
The root of the hierarchy cannot have high set, so we will never reclaim based on it. This makes that clearer and avoids another entry. Signed-off-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200312164137.GA1753625@chrisdown.name Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02mm: memcg: make memory.oom.group tolerable to task migrationRoman Gushchin
If a task is getting moved out of the OOMing cgroup, it might result in unexpected OOM killings if memory.oom.group is used anywhere in the cgroup tree. Imagine the following example: A (oom.group = 1) / \ (OOM) B C Let's say B's memory.max is exceeded and it's OOMing. The OOM killer selects a task in B as a victim, but someone asynchronously moves the task into C. mem_cgroup_get_oom_group() will iterate over all ancestors of C up to the root cgroup. In theory it had to stop at the oom_domain level - the memory cgroup which is OOMing. But because B is not an ancestor of C, it's not happening. Instead it chooses A (because it's oom.group is set), and kills all tasks in A. This behavior is wrong because the OOM happened in B, so there is no reason to kill anything outside. Fix this by checking it the memory cgroup to which the task belongs is a descendant of the oom_domain. If not, memory.oom.group should be ignored, and the OOM killer should kill only the victim task. Reported-by: Dan Schatzberg <dschatzberg@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200316223510.3176148-1-guro@fb.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02mm, memcg: prevent mem_cgroup_protected store tearingChris Down
The read side of this is all protected, but we can still tear if multiple iterations of mem_cgroup_protected are going at the same time. There's some intentional racing in mem_cgroup_protected which is ok, but load/store tearing should be avoided. Signed-off-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/d1e9fbc0379fe8db475d82c8b6fbe048876e12ae.1584034301.git.chris@chrisdown.name Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02mm, memcg: prevent memory.swap.max load tearingChris Down
The write side of this is xchg()/smp_mb(), so that's all good. Just a few sites missing a READ_ONCE. Signed-off-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/bbec2c3d822217334855c8877a9d28b2a6d395fb.1584034301.git.chris@chrisdown.name Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02mm, memcg: prevent memory.min load/store tearingChris Down
This can be set concurrently with reads, which may cause the wrong value to be propagated. Signed-off-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e809b4e6b0c1626dac6945970de06409a180ee65.1584034301.git.chris@chrisdown.name Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02mm, memcg: prevent memory.max load tearingChris Down
This one is a bit more nuanced because we have memcg_max_mutex, which is mostly just used for enforcing invariants, but we still need to READ_ONCE since (despite its name) it doesn't really protect memory.max access. On write (page_counter_set_max() and memory_max_write()) we use xchg(), which uses smp_mb(), so that's already fine. Signed-off-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/50a31e5f39f8ae6c8fb73966ba1455f0924e8f44.1584034301.git.chris@chrisdown.name Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02mm, memcg: prevent memory.high load/store tearingChris Down
A mem_cgroup's high attribute can be concurrently set at the same time as we are trying to read it -- for example, if we are in memory_high_write at the same time as we are trying to do high reclaim. Signed-off-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2f66f7038ed1d4688e59de72b627ae0ea52efa83.1584034301.git.chris@chrisdown.name Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02mm/memcontrol.c: make mem_cgroup_id_get_many() __maybe_unusedVincenzo Frascino
mem_cgroup_id_get_many() is currently used only when MMU or MEMCG_SWAP configuration options are enabled. Having them disabled triggers the following warning at compile time: linux/mm/memcontrol.c:4797:13: warning: `mem_cgroup_id_get_many' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] static void mem_cgroup_id_get_many(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int n) Make mem_cgroup_id_get_many() __maybe_unused to address the issue. Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200305164354.48147-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02memcg: css_tryget_online cleanupsShakeel Butt
Currently multiple locations in memcg code, css_tryget_online() is being used. However it doesn't matter whether the cgroup is online for the callers. Online used to matter when we had reparenting on offlining and we needed a way to prevent new ones from showing up. The failure case for couple of these css_tryget_online usage is to fallback to root_mem_cgroup which kind of make bypassing the memcg limits possible for some workloads. For example creating an inotify group in a subcontainer and then deleting that container after moving the process to a different container will make all the event objects allocated for that group to the root_mem_cgroup. So, using css_tryget_online() is dangerous for such cases. Two locations still use the online version. The swapin of offlined memcg's pages and the memcg kmem cache creation. The kmem cache indeed needs the online version as the kernel does the reparenting of memcg kmem caches. For the swapin case, it has been left for later as the fallback is not really that concerning. With swap accounting enabled, if the memcg of the swapped out page is not online then the memcg extracted from the given 'mm' will be charged and if 'mm' is NULL then root memcg will be charged. However I could not find a code path where the given 'mm' will be NULL for swap-in case. Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200302203109.179417-1-shakeelb@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02mm: memcontrol: recursive memory.low protectionJohannes Weiner
Right now, the effective protection of any given cgroup is capped by its own explicit memory.low setting, regardless of what the parent says. The reasons for this are mostly historical and ease of implementation: to make delegation of memory.low safe, effective protection is the min() of all memory.low up the tree. Unfortunately, this limitation makes it impossible to protect an entire subtree from another without forcing the user to make explicit protection allocations all the way to the leaf cgroups - something that is highly undesirable in real life scenarios. Consider memory in a data center host. At the cgroup top level, we have a distinction between system management software and the actual workload the system is executing. Both branches are further subdivided into individual services, job components etc. We want to protect the workload as a whole from the system management software, but that doesn't mean we want to protect and prioritize individual workload wrt each other. Their memory demand can vary over time, and we'd want the VM to simply cache the hottest data within the workload subtree. Yet, the current memory.low limitations force us to allocate a fixed amount of protection to each workload component in order to get protection from system management software in general. This results in very inefficient resource distribution. Another concern with mandating downward allocation is that, as the complexity of the cgroup tree grows, it gets harder for the lower levels to be informed about decisions made at the host-level. Consider a container inside a namespace that in turn creates its own nested tree of cgroups to run multiple workloads. It'd be extremely difficult to configure memory.low parameters in those leaf cgroups that on one hand balance pressure among siblings as the container desires, while also reflecting the host-level protection from e.g. rpm upgrades, that lie beyond one or more delegation and namespacing points in the tree. It's highly unusual from a cgroup interface POV that nested levels have to be aware of and reflect decisions made at higher levels for them to be effective. To enable such use cases and scale configurability for complex trees, this patch implements a resource inheritance model for memory that is similar to how the CPU and the IO controller implement work-conserving resource allocations: a share of a resource allocated to a subree always applies to the entire subtree recursively, while allowing, but not mandating, children to further specify distribution rules. That means that if protection is explicitly allocated among siblings, those configured shares are being followed during page reclaim just like they are now. However, if the memory.low set at a higher level is not fully claimed by the children in that subtree, the "floating" remainder is applied to each cgroup in the tree in proportion to its size. Since reclaim pressure is applied in proportion to size as well, each child in that tree gets the same boost, and the effect is neutral among siblings - with respect to each other, they behave as if no memory control was enabled at all, and the VM simply balances the memory demands optimally within the subtree. But collectively those cgroups enjoy a boost over the cgroups in neighboring trees. E.g. a leaf cgroup with a memory.low setting of 0 no longer means that it's not getting a share of the hierarchically assigned resource, just that it doesn't claim a fixed amount of it to protect from its siblings. This allows us to recursively protect one subtree (workload) from another (system management), while letting subgroups compete freely among each other - without having to assign fixed shares to each leaf, and without nested groups having to echo higher-level settings. The floating protection composes naturally with fixed protection. Consider the following example tree: A A: low = 2G / \ A1: low = 1G A1 A2 A2: low = 0G As outside pressure is applied to this tree, A1 will enjoy a fixed protection from A2 of 1G, but the remaining, unclaimed 1G from A is split evenly among A1 and A2, coming out to 1.5G and 0.5G. There is a slight risk of regressing theoretical setups where the top-level cgroups don't know about the true budgeting and set bogusly high "bypass" values that are meaningfully allocated down the tree. Such setups would rely on unclaimed protection to be discarded, and distributing it would change the intended behavior. Be safe and hide the new behavior behind a mount option, 'memory_recursiveprot'. Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Acked-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200227195606.46212-4-hannes@cmpxchg.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02mm: memcontrol: clean up and document effective low/min calculationsJohannes Weiner
The effective protection of any given cgroup is a somewhat complicated construct that depends on the ancestor's configuration, siblings' configurations, as well as current memory utilization in all these groups. It's done this way to satisfy hierarchical delegation requirements while also making the configuration semantics flexible and expressive in complex real life scenarios. Unfortunately, all the rules and requirements are sparsely documented, and the code is a little too clever in merging different scenarios into a single min() expression. This makes it hard to reason about the implementation and avoid breaking semantics when making changes to it. This patch documents each semantic rule individually and splits out the handling of the overcommit case from the regular case. Michal Koutný also points out that the points of equilibrium as described in the existing example scenarios aren't actually accurate. Delete these examples for now to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Acked-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200227195606.46212-3-hannes@cmpxchg.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02mm: memcontrol: fix memory.low proportional distributionJohannes Weiner
Patch series "mm: memcontrol: recursive memory.low protection", v3. The current memory.low (and memory.min) semantics require protection to be assigned to a cgroup in an untinterrupted chain from the top-level cgroup all the way to the leaf. In practice, we want to protect entire cgroup subtrees from each other (system management software vs. workload), but we would like the VM to balance memory optimally *within* each subtree, without having to make explicit weight allocations among individual components. The current semantics make that impossible. They also introduce unmanageable complexity into more advanced resource trees. For example: host root `- system.slice `- rpm upgrades `- logging `- workload.slice `- a container `- system.slice `- workload.slice `- job A `- component 1 `- component 2 `- job B At a host-level perspective, we would like to protect the outer workload.slice subtree as a whole from rpm upgrades, logging etc. But for that to be effective, right now we'd have to propagate it down through the container, the inner workload.slice, into the job cgroup and ultimately the component cgroups where memory is actually, physically allocated. This may cross several tree delegation points and namespace boundaries, which make such a setup near impossible. CPU and IO on the other hand are already distributed recursively. The user would simply configure allowances at the host level, and they would apply to the entire subtree without any downward propagation. To enable the above-mentioned usecases and bring memory in line with other resource controllers, this patch series extends memory.low/min such that settings apply recursively to the entire subtree. Users can still assign explicit shares in subgroups, but if they don't, any ancestral protection will be distributed such that children compete freely amongst each other - as if no memory control were enabled inside the subtree - but enjoy protection from neighboring trees. In the above example, the user would then be able to configure shares of CPU, IO and memory at the host level to comprehensively protect and isolate the workload.slice as a whole from system.slice activity. Patch #1 fixes an existing bug that can give a cgroup tree more protection than it should receive as per ancestor configuration. Patch #2 simplifies and documents the existing code to make it easier to reason about the changes in the next patch. Patch #3 finally implements recursive memory protection semantics. Because of a risk of regressing legacy setups, the new semantics are hidden behind a cgroup2 mount option, 'memory_recursiveprot'. More details in patch #3. This patch (of 3): When memory.low is overcommitted - i.e. the children claim more protection than their shared ancestor grants them - the allowance is distributed in proportion to how much each sibling uses their own declared protection: low_usage = min(memory.low, memory.current) elow = parent_elow * (low_usage / siblings_low_usage) However, siblings_low_usage is not the sum of all low_usages. It sums up the usages of *only those cgroups that are within their memory.low* That means that low_usage can be *bigger* than siblings_low_usage, and consequently the total protection afforded to the children can be bigger than what the ancestor grants the subtree. Consider three groups where two are in excess of their protection: A/memory.low = 10G A/A1/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 20G A/A2/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 20G A/A3/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 8G siblings_low_usage = 8G (only A3 contributes) A1/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(10G) / siblings_low_usage(8G) = 12.5G -> 10G A2/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(10G) / siblings_low_usage(8G) = 12.5G -> 10G A3/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(8G) / siblings_low_usage(8G) = 10.0G (the 12.5G are capped to the explicit memory.low setting of 10G) With that, the sum of all awarded protection below A is 30G, when A only grants 10G for the entire subtree. What does this mean in practice? A1 and A2 would still be in excess of their 10G allowance and would be reclaimed, whereas A3 would not. As they eventually drop below their protection setting, they would be counted in siblings_low_usage again and the error would right itself. When reclaim was applied in a binary fashion (cgroup is reclaimed when it's above its protection, otherwise it's skipped) this would actually work out just fine. However, since 1bc63fb1272b ("mm, memcg: make scan aggression always exclude protection"), reclaim pressure is scaled to how much a cgroup is above its protection. As a result this calculation error unduly skews pressure away from A1 and A2 toward the rest of the system. But why did we do it like this in the first place? The reasoning behind exempting groups in excess from siblings_low_usage was to go after them first during reclaim in an overcommitted subtree: A/memory.low = 2G, memory.current = 4G A/A1/memory.low = 3G, memory.current = 2G A/A2/memory.low = 1G, memory.current = 2G siblings_low_usage = 2G (only A1 contributes) A1/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(2G) / siblings_low_usage(2G) = 2G A2/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(1G) / siblings_low_usage(2G) = 1G While the children combined are overcomitting A and are technically both at fault, A2 is actively declaring unprotected memory and we would like to reclaim that first. However, while this sounds like a noble goal on the face of it, it doesn't make much difference in actual memory distribution: Because A is overcommitted, reclaim will not stop once A2 gets pushed back to within its allowance; we'll have to reclaim A1 either way. The end result is still that protection is distributed proportionally, with A1 getting 3/4 (1.5G) and A2 getting 1/4 (0.5G) of A's allowance. [ If A weren't overcommitted, it wouldn't make a difference since each cgroup would just get the protection it declares: A/memory.low = 2G, memory.current = 3G A/A1/memory.low = 1G, memory.current = 1G A/A2/memory.low = 1G, memory.current = 2G With the current calculation: siblings_low_usage = 1G (only A1 contributes) A1/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(1G) / siblings_low_usage(1G) = 2G -> 1G A2/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(1G) / siblings_low_usage(1G) = 2G -> 1G Including excess groups in siblings_low_usage: siblings_low_usage = 2G A1/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(1G) / siblings_low_usage(2G) = 1G -> 1G A2/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(1G) / siblings_low_usage(2G) = 1G -> 1G ] Simplify the calculation and fix the proportional reclaim bug by including excess cgroups in siblings_low_usage. After this patch, the effective memory.low distribution from the example above would be as follows: A/memory.low = 10G A/A1/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 20G A/A2/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 20G A/A3/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 8G siblings_low_usage = 28G A1/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(10G) / siblings_low_usage(28G) = 3.5G A2/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(10G) / siblings_low_usage(28G) = 3.5G A3/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(8G) / siblings_low_usage(28G) = 2.8G Fixes: 1bc63fb1272b ("mm, memcg: make scan aggression always exclude protection") Fixes: 230671533d64 ("mm: memory.low hierarchical behavior") Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Acked-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200227195606.46212-2-hannes@cmpxchg.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02mm: kmem: rename (__)memcg_kmem_(un)charge_memcg() to __memcg_kmem_(un)charge()Roman Gushchin
Drop the _memcg suffix from (__)memcg_kmem_(un)charge functions. It's shorter and more obvious. These are the most basic functions which are just (un)charging the given cgroup with the given amount of pages. Also fix up the corresponding comments. Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200109202659.752357-7-guro@fb.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02mm: kmem: switch to nr_pages in (__)memcg_kmem_charge_memcg()Roman Gushchin
These functions are charging the given number of kernel pages to the given memory cgroup. The number doesn't have to be a power of two. Let's make them to take the unsigned int nr_pages as an argument instead of the page order. It makes them look consistent with the corresponding uncharge functions and functions like: mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(memcg, nr_pages). Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200109202659.752357-5-guro@fb.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02mm: kmem: rename memcg_kmem_(un)charge() into memcg_kmem_(un)charge_page()Roman Gushchin
Rename (__)memcg_kmem_(un)charge() into (__)memcg_kmem_(un)charge_page() to better reflect what they are actually doing: 1) call __memcg_kmem_(un)charge_memcg() to actually charge or uncharge the current memcg 2) set or clear the PageKmemcg flag Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200109202659.752357-4-guro@fb.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02mm: kmem: cleanup (__)memcg_kmem_charge_memcg() argumentsRoman Gushchin
Patch series "mm: memcg: kmem API cleanup", v2. This patchset aims to clean up the kernel memory charging API. It doesn't bring any functional changes, just removes unused arguments, renames some functions and fixes some comments. Currently it's not obvious which functions are most basic (memcg_kmem_(un)charge_memcg()) and which are based on them (memcg_kmem_(un)charge()). The patchset renames these functions and removes unused arguments: TL;DR: was: memcg_kmem_charge_memcg(page, gfp, order, memcg) memcg_kmem_uncharge_memcg(memcg, nr_pages) memcg_kmem_charge(page, gfp, order) memcg_kmem_uncharge(page, order) now: memcg_kmem_charge(memcg, gfp, nr_pages) memcg_kmem_uncharge(memcg, nr_pages) memcg_kmem_charge_page(page, gfp, order) memcg_kmem_uncharge_page(page, order) This patch (of 6): The first argument of memcg_kmem_charge_memcg() and __memcg_kmem_charge_memcg() is the page pointer and it's not used. Let's drop it. Memcg pointer is passed as the last argument. Move it to the first place for consistency with other memcg functions, e.g. __memcg_kmem_uncharge_memcg() or try_charge(). Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200109202659.752357-2-guro@fb.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02mm: memcg/slab: use mem_cgroup_from_obj()Roman Gushchin
Sometimes we need to get a memcg pointer from a charged kernel object. The right way to get it depends on whether it's a proper slab object or it's backed by raw pages (e.g. it's a vmalloc alloction). In the first case the kmem_cache->memcg_params.memcg indirection should be used; in other cases it's just page->mem_cgroup. To simplify this task and hide the implementation details let's use the mem_cgroup_from_obj() helper, which takes a pointer to any kernel object and returns a valid memcg pointer or NULL. Passing a kernel address rather than a pointer to a page will allow to use this helper for per-object (rather than per-page) tracked objects in the future. The caller is still responsible to ensure that the returned memcg isn't going away underneath: take the rcu read lock, cgroup mutex etc; depending on the context. mem_cgroup_from_kmem() defined in mm/list_lru.c is now obsolete and can be removed. Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Acked-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200117203609.3146239-1-guro@fb.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02mm/memcontrol.c: allocate shrinker_map on appropriate NUMA nodeKirill Tkhai
The shrinker_map may be touched from any cpu (e.g., a bit there may be set by a task running everywhere) but kswapd is always bound to specific node. So allocate shrinker_map from the related NUMA node to respect its NUMA locality. Also, this follows generic way we use for allocation of memcg's per-node data. Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/fff0e636-4c36-ed10-281c-8cdb0687c839@virtuozzo.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02mm, memcg: fix build error around the usage of kmem_cachesYafang Shao
When I manually set default n to MEMCG_KMEM in init/Kconfig, bellow error occurs, mm/slab_common.c: In function 'memcg_slab_start': mm/slab_common.c:1530:30: error: 'struct mem_cgroup' has no member named 'kmem_caches' return seq_list_start(&memcg->kmem_caches, *pos); ^ mm/slab_common.c: In function 'memcg_slab_next': mm/slab_common.c:1537:32: error: 'struct mem_cgroup' has no member named 'kmem_caches' return seq_list_next(p, &memcg->kmem_caches, pos); ^ mm/slab_common.c: In function 'memcg_slab_show': mm/slab_common.c:1551:16: error: 'struct mem_cgroup' has no member named 'kmem_caches' if (p == memcg->kmem_caches.next) ^ CC arch/x86/xen/smp.o mm/slab_common.c: In function 'memcg_slab_start': mm/slab_common.c:1531:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] } ^ mm/slab_common.c: In function 'memcg_slab_next': mm/slab_common.c:1538:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] } ^ That's because kmem_caches is defined only when CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is set, while memcg_slab_start() will use it no matter CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is defined or not. By the way, the reason I mannuly undefined CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is to verify whether my some other code change is still stable when CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is not set. Unfortunately, the existing code has been already unstable since v4.11. Fixes: bc2791f857e1 ("slab: link memcg kmem_caches on their associated memory cgroup") Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1580970260-2045-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-03-29mm: fork: fix kernel_stack memcg stats for various stack implementationsRoman Gushchin
Depending on CONFIG_VMAP_STACK and the THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE ratio the space for task stacks can be allocated using __vmalloc_node_range(), alloc_pages_node() and kmem_cache_alloc_node(). In the first and the second cases page->mem_cgroup pointer is set, but in the third it's not: memcg membership of a slab page should be determined using the memcg_from_slab_page() function, which looks at page->slab_cache->memcg_params.memcg . In this case, using mod_memcg_page_state() (as in account_kernel_stack()) is incorrect: page->mem_cgroup pointer is NULL even for pages charged to a non-root memory cgroup. It can lead to kernel_stack per-memcg counters permanently showing 0 on some architectures (depending on the configuration). In order to fix it, let's introduce a mod_memcg_obj_state() helper, which takes a pointer to a kernel object as a first argument, uses mem_cgroup_from_obj() to get a RCU-protected memcg pointer and calls mod_memcg_state(). It allows to handle all possible configurations (CONFIG_VMAP_STACK and various THREAD_SIZE/PAGE_SIZE values) without spilling any memcg/kmem specifics into fork.c . Note: This is a special version of the patch created for stable backports. It contains code from the following two patches: - mm: memcg/slab: introduce mem_cgroup_from_obj() - mm: fork: fix kernel_stack memcg stats for various stack implementations [guro@fb.com: introduce mem_cgroup_from_obj()] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200324004221.GA36662@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com Fixes: 4d96ba353075 ("mm: memcg/slab: stop setting page->mem_cgroup pointer for slab pages") Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200303233550.251375-1-guro@fb.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-03-21mm, memcg: throttle allocators based on ancestral memory.highChris Down
Prior to this commit, we only directly check the affected cgroup's memory.high against its usage. However, it's possible that we are being reclaimed as a result of hitting an ancestor memory.high and should be penalised based on that, instead. This patch changes memory.high overage throttling to use the largest overage in its ancestors when considering how many penalty jiffies to charge. This makes sure that we penalise poorly behaving cgroups in the same way regardless of at what level of the hierarchy memory.high was breached. Fixes: 0e4b01df8659 ("mm, memcg: throttle allocators when failing reclaim over memory.high") Reported-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [5.4.x+] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8cd132f84bd7e16cdb8fde3378cdbf05ba00d387.1584036142.git.chris@chrisdown.name Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-03-21mm, memcg: fix corruption on 64-bit divisor in memory.high throttlingChris Down
Commit 0e4b01df8659 had a bunch of fixups to use the right division method. However, it seems that after all that it still wasn't right -- div_u64 takes a 32-bit divisor. The headroom is still large (2^32 pages), so on mundane systems you won't hit this, but this should definitely be fixed. Fixes: 0e4b01df8659 ("mm, memcg: throttle allocators when failing reclaim over memory.high") Reported-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [5.4.x+] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/80780887060514967d414b3cd91f9a316a16ab98.1584036142.git.chris@chrisdown.name Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-03-21memcg: fix NULL pointer dereference in __mem_cgroup_usage_unregister_eventChunguang Xu
An eventfd monitors multiple memory thresholds of the cgroup, closes them, the kernel deletes all events related to this eventfd. Before all events are deleted, another eventfd monitors the memory threshold of this cgroup, leading to a crash: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000004 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 800000033058e067 P4D 800000033058e067 PUD 3355ce067 PMD 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 2 PID: 14012 Comm: kworker/2:6 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.6.0-rc4 #3 Hardware name: LENOVO 20AWS01K00/20AWS01K00, BIOS GLET70WW (2.24 ) 05/21/2014 Workqueue: events memcg_event_remove RIP: 0010:__mem_cgroup_usage_unregister_event+0xb3/0x190 RSP: 0018:ffffb47e01c4fe18 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff8bb223a8a000 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff8bb22fb83540 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: ffffb47e01c4fe48 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000010 R10: 000000000000000c R11: 071c71c71c71c71c R12: ffff8bb226aba880 R13: ffff8bb223a8a480 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8bb242680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000004 CR3: 000000032c29c003 CR4: 00000000001606e0 Call Trace: memcg_event_remove+0x32/0x90 process_one_work+0x172/0x380 worker_thread+0x49/0x3f0 kthread+0xf8/0x130 ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 CR2: 0000000000000004 We can reproduce this problem in the following ways: 1. We create a new cgroup subdirectory and a new eventfd, and then we monitor multiple memory thresholds of the cgroup through this eventfd. 2. closing this eventfd, and __mem_cgroup_usage_unregister_event () will be called multiple times to delete all events related to this eventfd. The first time __mem_cgroup_usage_unregister_event() is called, the kernel will clear all items related to this eventfd in thresholds-> primary. Since there is currently only one eventfd, thresholds-> primary becomes empty, so the kernel will set thresholds-> primary and hresholds-> spare to NULL. If at this time, the user creates a new eventfd and monitor the memory threshold of this cgroup, kernel will re-initialize thresholds-> primary. Then when __mem_cgroup_usage_unregister_event () is called for the second time, because thresholds-> primary is not empty, the system will access thresholds-> spare, but thresholds-> spare is NULL, which will trigger a crash. In general, the longer it takes to delete all events related to this eventfd, the easier it is to trigger this problem. The solution is to check whether the thresholds associated with the eventfd has been cleared when deleting the event. If so, we do nothing. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix comment, per Kirill] Fixes: 907860ed381a ("cgroups: make cftype.unregister_event() void-returning") Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/077a6f67-aefa-4591-efec-f2f3af2b0b02@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-03-10net: memcg: late association of sock to memcgShakeel Butt
If a TCP socket is allocated in IRQ context or cloned from unassociated (i.e. not associated to a memcg) in IRQ context then it will remain unassociated for its whole life. Almost half of the TCPs created on the system are created in IRQ context, so, memory used by such sockets will not be accounted by the memcg. This issue is more widespread in cgroup v1 where network memory accounting is opt-in but it can happen in cgroup v2 if the source socket for the cloning was created in root memcg. To fix the issue, just do the association of the sockets at the accept() time in the process context and then force charge the memory buffer already used and reserved by the socket. Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-03-10cgroup: memcg: net: do not associate sock with unrelated cgroupShakeel Butt
We are testing network memory accounting in our setup and noticed inconsistent network memory usage and often unrelated cgroups network usage correlates with testing workload. On further inspection, it seems like mem_cgroup_sk_alloc() and cgroup_sk_alloc() are broken in irq context specially for cgroup v1. mem_cgroup_sk_alloc() and cgroup_sk_alloc() can be called in irq context and kind of assumes that this can only happen from sk_clone_lock() and the source sock object has already associated cgroup. However in cgroup v1, where network memory accounting is opt-in, the source sock can be unassociated with any cgroup and the new cloned sock can get associated with unrelated interrupted cgroup. Cgroup v2 can also suffer if the source sock object was created by process in the root cgroup or if sk_alloc() is called in irq context. The fix is to just do nothing in interrupt. WARNING: Please note that about half of the TCP sockets are allocated from the IRQ context, so, memory used by such sockets will not be accouted by the memcg. The stack trace of mem_cgroup_sk_alloc() from IRQ-context: CPU: 70 PID: 12720 Comm: ssh Tainted: 5.6.0-smp-DEV #1 Hardware name: ... Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack+0x57/0x75 mem_cgroup_sk_alloc+0xe9/0xf0 sk_clone_lock+0x2a7/0x420 inet_csk_clone_lock+0x1b/0x110 tcp_create_openreq_child+0x23/0x3b0 tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock+0x88/0x730 tcp_check_req+0x429/0x560 tcp_v6_rcv+0x72d/0xa40 ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0xc9/0x400 ip6_input+0x44/0xd0 ? ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x400/0x400 ip6_rcv_finish+0x71/0x80 ipv6_rcv+0x5b/0xe0 ? ip6_sublist_rcv+0x2e0/0x2e0 process_backlog+0x108/0x1e0 net_rx_action+0x26b/0x460 __do_softirq+0x104/0x2a6 do_softirq_own_stack+0x2a/0x40 </IRQ> do_softirq.part.19+0x40/0x50 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x51/0x60 ip6_finish_output2+0x23d/0x520 ? ip6table_mangle_hook+0x55/0x160 __ip6_finish_output+0xa1/0x100 ip6_finish_output+0x30/0xd0 ip6_output+0x73/0x120 ? __ip6_finish_output+0x100/0x100 ip6_xmit+0x2e3/0x600 ? ipv6_anycast_cleanup+0x50/0x50 ? inet6_csk_route_socket+0x136/0x1e0 ? skb_free_head+0x1e/0x30 inet6_csk_xmit+0x95/0xf0 __tcp_transmit_skb+0x5b4/0xb20 __tcp_send_ack.part.60+0xa3/0x110 tcp_send_ack+0x1d/0x20 tcp_rcv_state_process+0xe64/0xe80 ? tcp_v6_connect+0x5d1/0x5f0 tcp_v6_do_rcv+0x1b1/0x3f0 ? tcp_v6_do_rcv+0x1b1/0x3f0 __release_sock+0x7f/0xd0 release_sock+0x30/0xa0 __inet_stream_connect+0x1c3/0x3b0 ? prepare_to_wait+0xb0/0xb0 inet_stream_connect+0x3b/0x60 __sys_connect+0x101/0x120 ? __sys_getsockopt+0x11b/0x140 __x64_sys_connect+0x1a/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x51/0x200 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 The stack trace of mem_cgroup_sk_alloc() from IRQ-context: Fixes: 2d7580738345 ("mm: memcontrol: consolidate cgroup socket tracking") Fixes: d979a39d7242 ("cgroup: duplicate cgroup reference when cloning sockets") Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-02-21mm/memcontrol.c: lost css_put in memcg_expand_shrinker_maps()Vasily Averin
for_each_mem_cgroup() increases css reference counter for memory cgroup and requires to use mem_cgroup_iter_break() if the walk is cancelled. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/c98414fb-7e1f-da0f-867a-9340ec4bd30b@virtuozzo.com Fixes: 0a4465d34028 ("mm, memcg: assign memcg-aware shrinkers bitmap to memcg") Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com> Acked-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-01-31mm/memcontrol.c: cleanup some useless codeKaitao Cheng
Compound pages handling in mem_cgroup_migrate is more convoluted than necessary. The state is duplicated in compound variable and the same could be achieved by PageTransHuge check which is trivial and hpage_nr_pages is already PageTransHuge aware. It is much simpler to just use hpage_nr_pages for nr_pages and replace the local variable by PageTransHuge check directly Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191210160450.3395-1-pilgrimtao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kaitao Cheng <pilgrimtao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-01-31mm: thp: don't need care deferred split queue in memcg charge move pathWei Yang
If compound is true, this means it is a PMD mapped THP. Which implies the page is not linked to any defer list. So the first code chunk will not be executed. Also with this reason, it would not be proper to add this page to a defer list. So the second code chunk is not correct. Based on this, we should remove the defer list related code. [yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com: better patch title] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200117233836.3434-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com Fixes: 87eaceb3faa5 ("mm: thp: make deferred split shrinker memcg aware") Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> Suggested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [5.4+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-01-13mm: memcg/slab: fix percpu slab vmstats flushingRoman Gushchin
Currently slab percpu vmstats are flushed twice: during the memcg offlining and just before freeing the memcg structure. Each time percpu counters are summed, added to the atomic counterparts and propagated up by the cgroup tree. The second flushing is required due to how recursive vmstats are implemented: counters are batched in percpu variables on a local level, and once a percpu value is crossing some predefined threshold, it spills over to atomic values on the local and each ascendant levels. It means that without flushing some numbers cached in percpu variables will be dropped on floor each time a cgroup is destroyed. And with uptime the error on upper levels might become noticeable. The first flushing aims to make counters on ancestor levels more precise. Dying cgroups may resume in the dying state for a long time. After kmem_cache reparenting which is performed during the offlining slab counters of the dying cgroup don't have any chances to be updated, because any slab operations will be performed on the parent level. It means that the inaccuracy caused by percpu batching will not decrease up to the final destruction of the cgroup. By the original idea flushing slab counters during the offlining should minimize the visible inaccuracy of slab counters on the parent level. The problem is that percpu counters are not zeroed after the first flushing. So every cached percpu value is summed twice. It creates a small error (up to 32 pages per cpu, but usually less) which accumulates on parent cgroup level. After creating and destroying of thousands of child cgroups, slab counter on parent level can be way off the real value. For now, let's just stop flushing slab counters on memcg offlining. It can't be done correctly without scheduling a work on each cpu: reading and zeroing it during css offlining can race with an asynchronous update, which doesn't expect values to be changed underneath. With this change, slab counters on parent level will become eventually consistent. Once all dying children are gone, values are correct. And if not, the error is capped by 32 * NR_CPUS pages per dying cgroup. It's not perfect, as slab are reparented, so any updates after the reparenting will happen on the parent level. It means that if a slab page was allocated, a counter on child level was bumped, then the page was reparented and freed, the annihilation of positive and negative counter values will not happen until the child cgroup is released. It makes slab counters different from others, and it might want us to implement flushing in a correct form again. But it's also a question of performance: scheduling a work on each cpu isn't free, and it's an open question if the benefit of having more accurate counters is worth it. We might also consider flushing all counters on offlining, not only slab counters. So let's fix the main problem now: make the slab counters eventually consistent, so at least the error won't grow with uptime (or more precisely the number of created and destroyed cgroups). And think about the accuracy of counters separately. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191220042728.1045881-1-guro@fb.com Fixes: bee07b33db78 ("mm: memcontrol: flush percpu slab vmstats on kmem offlining") Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-12-04mm/memcontrol: use vmstat names for printing statisticsKonstantin Khlebnikov
Use common names from vmstat array when possible. This gives not much difference in code size for now, but should help in keeping interfaces consistent. add/remove: 0/2 grow/shrink: 2/0 up/down: 70/-72 (-2) Function old new delta memory_stat_format 984 1050 +66 memcg_stat_show 957 961 +4 memcg1_event_names 32 - -32 mem_cgroup_lru_names 40 - -40 Total: Before=14485337, After=14485335, chg -0.00% Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/157113012508.453.80391533767219371.stgit@buzz Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> Acked-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-12-01mm: clean up and clarify lruvec lookup procedureJohannes Weiner
There is a per-memcg lruvec and a NUMA node lruvec. Which one is being used is somewhat confusing right now, and it's easy to make mistakes - especially when it comes to global reclaim. How it works: when memory cgroups are enabled, we always use the root_mem_cgroup's per-node lruvecs. When memory cgroups are not compiled in or disabled at runtime, we use pgdat->lruvec. Document that in a comment. Due to the way the reclaim code is generalized, all lookups use the mem_cgroup_lruvec() helper function, and nobody should have to find the right lruvec manually right now. But to avoid future mistakes, rename the pgdat->lruvec member to pgdat->__lruvec and delete the convenience wrapper that suggests it's a commonly accessed member. While in this area, swap the mem_cgroup_lruvec() argument order. The name suggests a memcg operation, yet it takes a pgdat first and a memcg second. I have to double take every time I call this. Fix that. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191022144803.302233-3-hannes@cmpxchg.org Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-12-01mm: vmscan: memcontrol: remove mem_cgroup_select_victim_node()Shakeel Butt
Since commit 1ba6fc9af35b ("mm: vmscan: do not share cgroup iteration between reclaimers"), the memcg reclaim does not bail out earlier based on sc->nr_reclaimed and will traverse all the nodes. All the reclaimable pages of the memcg on all the nodes will be scanned relative to the reclaim priority. So, there is no need to maintain state regarding which node to start the memcg reclaim from. This patch effectively reverts the commit 889976dbcb12 ("memcg: reclaim memory from nodes in round-robin order") and commit 453a9bf347f1 ("memcg: fix numa scan information update to be triggered by memory event"). [shakeelb@google.com: v2] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191030204232.139424-1-shakeelb@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191029234753.224143-1-shakeelb@google.com Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-12-01mm: memcontrol: try harder to set a new memory.highJohannes Weiner
Setting a memory.high limit below the usage makes almost no effort to shrink the cgroup to the new target size. While memory.high is a "soft" limit that isn't supposed to cause OOM situations, we should still try harder to meet a user request through persistent reclaim. For example, after setting a 10M memory.high on an 800M cgroup full of file cache, the usage shrinks to about 350M: + cat /cgroup/workingset/memory.current 841568256 + echo 10M + cat /cgroup/workingset/memory.current 355729408 This isn't exactly what the user would expect to happen. Setting the value a few more times eventually whittles the usage down to what we are asking for: + echo 10M + cat /cgroup/workingset/memory.current 104181760 + echo 10M + cat /cgroup/workingset/memory.current 31801344 + echo 10M + cat /cgroup/workingset/memory.current 10440704 To improve this, add reclaim retry loops to the memory.high write() callback, similar to what we do for memory.max, to make a reasonable effort that the usage meets the requested size after the call returns. Afterwards, a single write() to memory.high is enough in all but extreme cases: + cat /cgroup/workingset/memory.current 841609216 + echo 10M + cat /cgroup/workingset/memory.current 10182656 790M is not a reasonable reclaim target to ask of a single reclaim invocation. And it wouldn't be reasonable to optimize the reclaim code for it. So asking for the full size but retrying is not a bad choice here: we express our intent, and benefit if reclaim becomes better at handling larger requests, but we also acknowledge that some of the deltas we can encounter in memory_high_write() are just too ridiculously big for a single reclaim invocation to manage. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191022201518.341216-2-hannes@cmpxchg.org Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-12-01mm: memcontrol: remove dead code from memory_max_write()Johannes Weiner
When the reclaim loop in memory_max_write() is ^C'd or similar, we set err to -EINTR. But we don't return err. Once the limit is set, we always return success (nbytes). Delete the dead code. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191022201518.341216-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-12-01mm, memcg: clean up reclaim iter arrayYafang Shao
The mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie is only used in memcg softlimit reclaim now, and the priority of the reclaim is always 0. We don't need to define the iter in struct mem_cgroup_per_node as an array any more. That could make the code more clear and save some space. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1569897728-1686-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-11-26Merge branch 'locking-core-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar: "The main changes in this cycle were: - A comprehensive rewrite of the robust/PI futex code's exit handling to fix various exit races. (Thomas Gleixner et al) - Rework the generic REFCOUNT_FULL implementation using atomic_fetch_* operations so that the performance impact of the cmpxchg() loops is mitigated for common refcount operations. With these performance improvements the generic implementation of refcount_t should be good enough for everybody - and this got confirmed by performance testing, so remove ARCH_HAS_REFCOUNT and REFCOUNT_FULL entirely, leaving the generic implementation enabled unconditionally. (Will Deacon) - Other misc changes, fixes, cleanups" * 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (27 commits) lkdtm: Remove references to CONFIG_REFCOUNT_FULL locking/refcount: Remove unused 'refcount_error_report()' function locking/refcount: Consolidate implementations of refcount_t locking/refcount: Consolidate REFCOUNT_{MAX,SATURATED} definitions locking/refcount: Move saturation warnings out of line locking/refcount: Improve performance of generic REFCOUNT_FULL code locking/refcount: Move the bulk of the REFCOUNT_FULL implementation into the <linux/refcount.h> header locking/refcount: Remove unused refcount_*_checked() variants locking/refcount: Ensure integer operands are treated as signed locking/refcount: Define constants for saturation and max refcount values futex: Prevent exit livelock futex: Provide distinct return value when owner is exiting futex: Add mutex around futex exit futex: Provide state handling for exec() as well futex: Sanitize exit state handling futex: Mark the begin of futex exit explicitly futex: Set task::futex_state to DEAD right after handling futex exit futex: Split futex_mm_release() for exit/exec exit/exec: Seperate mm_release() futex: Replace PF_EXITPIDONE with a state ...
2019-11-15mm: memcg: switch to css_tryget() in get_mem_cgroup_from_mm()Roman Gushchin
We've encountered a rcu stall in get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(): rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU rcu: 33-....: (21000 ticks this GP) idle=6c6/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=35441/35441 fqs=5017 (t=21031 jiffies g=324821 q=95837) NMI backtrace for cpu 33 <...> RIP: 0010:get_mem_cgroup_from_mm+0x2f/0x90 <...> __memcg_kmem_charge+0x55/0x140 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x267/0x320 pipe_write+0x1ad/0x400 new_sync_write+0x127/0x1c0 __kernel_write+0x4f/0xf0 dump_emit+0x91/0xc0 writenote+0xa0/0xc0 elf_core_dump+0x11af/0x1430 do_coredump+0xc65/0xee0 get_signal+0x132/0x7c0 do_signal+0x36/0x640 exit_to_usermode_loop+0x61/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0xd4/0x100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 The problem is caused by an exiting task which is associated with an offline memcg. We're iterating over and over in the do {} while (!css_tryget_online()) loop, but obviously the memcg won't become online and the exiting task won't be migrated to a live memcg. Let's fix it by switching from css_tryget_online() to css_tryget(). As css_tryget_online() cannot guarantee that the memcg won't go offline, the check is usually useless, except some rare cases when for example it determines if something should be presented to a user. A similar problem is described by commit 18fa84a2db0e ("cgroup: Use css_tryget() instead of css_tryget_online() in task_get_css()"). Johannes: : The bug aside, it doesn't matter whether the cgroup is online for the : callers. It used to matter when offlining needed to evacuate all charges : from the memcg, and so needed to prevent new ones from showing up, but we : don't care now. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191106225131.3543616-1-guro@fb.com Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeeb@google.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Michal Koutn <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-11-06mm: memcontrol: fix network errors from failing __GFP_ATOMIC chargesJohannes Weiner
While upgrading from 4.16 to 5.2, we noticed these allocation errors in the log of the new kernel: SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1, gfp=0xa20(GFP_ATOMIC) cache: tw_sock_TCPv6(960:helper-logs), object size: 232, buffer size: 240, default order: 1, min order: 0 node 0: slabs: 5, objs: 170, free: 0 slab_out_of_memory+1 ___slab_alloc+969 __slab_alloc+14 kmem_cache_alloc+346 inet_twsk_alloc+60 tcp_time_wait+46 tcp_fin+206 tcp_data_queue+2034 tcp_rcv_state_process+784 tcp_v6_do_rcv+405 __release_sock+118 tcp_close+385 inet_release+46 __sock_release+55 sock_close+17 __fput+170 task_work_run+127 exit_to_usermode_loop+191 do_syscall_64+212 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+68 accompanied by an increase in machines going completely radio silent under memory pressure. One thing that changed since 4.16 is e699e2c6a654 ("net, mm: account sock objects to kmemcg"), which made these slab caches subject to cgroup memory accounting and control. The problem with that is that cgroups, unlike the page allocator, do not maintain dedicated atomic reserves. As a cgroup's usage hovers at its limit, atomic allocations - such as done during network rx - can fail consistently for extended periods of time. The kernel is not able to operate under these conditions. We don't want to revert the culprit patch, because it indeed tracks a potentially substantial amount of memory used by a cgroup. We also don't want to implement dedicated atomic reserves for cgroups. There is no point in keeping a fixed margin of unused bytes in the cgroup's memory budget to accomodate a consumer that is impossible to predict - we'd be wasting memory and get into configuration headaches, not unlike what we have going with min_free_kbytes. We do this for physical mem because we have to, but cgroups are an accounting game. Instead, account these privileged allocations to the cgroup, but let them bypass the configured limit if they have to. This way, we get the benefits of accounting the consumed memory and have it exert pressure on the rest of the cgroup, but like with the page allocator, we shift the burden of reclaimining on behalf of atomic allocations onto the regular allocations that can block. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191022233708.365764-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org Fixes: e699e2c6a654 ("net, mm: account sock objects to kmemcg") Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [4.18+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-11-06mm: slab: make page_cgroup_ino() to recognize non-compound slab pages properlyRoman Gushchin
page_cgroup_ino() doesn't return a valid memcg pointer for non-compound slab pages, because it depends on PgHead AND PgSlab flags to be set to determine the memory cgroup from the kmem_cache. It's correct for compound pages, but not for generic small pages. Those don't have PgHead set, so it ends up returning zero. Fix this by replacing the condition to PageSlab() && !PageTail(). Before this patch: [root@localhost ~]# ./page-types -c /sys/fs/cgroup/user.slice/user-0.slice/user@0.service/ | grep slab 0x0000000000000080 38 0 _______S___________________________________ slab After this patch: [root@localhost ~]# ./page-types -c /sys/fs/cgroup/user.slice/user-0.slice/user@0.service/ | grep slab 0x0000000000000080 147 0 _______S___________________________________ slab Also, hwpoison_filter_task() uses output of page_cgroup_ino() in order to filter error injection events based on memcg. So if page_cgroup_ino() fails to return memcg pointer, we just fail to inject memory error. Considering that hwpoison filter is for testing, affected users are limited and the impact should be marginal. [n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com: changelog additions] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191031012151.2722280-1-guro@fb.com Fixes: 4d96ba353075 ("mm: memcg/slab: stop setting page->mem_cgroup pointer for slab pages") Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-11-06mm: memcontrol: fix NULL-ptr deref in percpu stats flushShakeel Butt
__mem_cgroup_free() can be called on the failure path in mem_cgroup_alloc(). However memcg_flush_percpu_vmstats() and memcg_flush_percpu_vmevents() which are called from __mem_cgroup_free() access the fields of memcg which can potentially be null if called from failure path from mem_cgroup_alloc(). Indeed syzbot has reported the following crash: kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 0 PID: 30393 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 5.4.0-rc2+ #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 RIP: 0010:memcg_flush_percpu_vmstats+0x4ae/0x930 mm/memcontrol.c:3436 Code: 05 41 89 c0 41 0f b6 04 24 41 38 c7 7c 08 84 c0 0f 85 5d 03 00 00 44 3b 05 33 d5 12 08 0f 83 e2 00 00 00 4c 89 f0 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 80 3c 28 00 0f 85 91 03 00 00 48 8b 85 10 fe ff ff 48 8b b0 90 RSP: 0018:ffff888095c27980 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 0000000000000012 RBX: ffff888095c27b28 RCX: ffffc90008192000 RDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: ffffffff8340fae7 RDI: 0000000000000007 RBP: ffff888095c27be0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffed1013f0da33 R10: ffffed1013f0da32 R11: ffff88809f86d197 R12: fffffbfff138b760 R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 0000000000000090 R15: 0000000000000007 FS: 00007f5027170700(0000) GS:ffff8880ae800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000710158 CR3: 00000000a7b18000 CR4: 00000000001406f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: __mem_cgroup_free+0x1a/0x190 mm/memcontrol.c:5021 mem_cgroup_free mm/memcontrol.c:5033 [inline] mem_cgroup_css_alloc+0x3a1/0x1ae0 mm/memcontrol.c:5160 css_create kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:5156 [inline] cgroup_apply_control_enable+0x44d/0xc40 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:3119 cgroup_mkdir+0x899/0x11b0 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:5401 kernfs_iop_mkdir+0x14d/0x1d0 fs/kernfs/dir.c:1124 vfs_mkdir+0x42e/0x670 fs/namei.c:3807 do_mkdirat+0x234/0x2a0 fs/namei.c:3830 __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:3846 [inline] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:3844 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdir+0x5c/0x80 fs/namei.c:3844 do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x760 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe Fixing this by moving the flush to mem_cgroup_free as there is no need to flush anything if we see failure in mem_cgroup_alloc(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191018165231.249872-1-shakeelb@google.com Fixes: bb65f89b7d3d ("mm: memcontrol: flush percpu vmevents before releasing memcg") Fixes: c350a99ea2b1 ("mm: memcontrol: flush percpu vmstats before releasing memcg") Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Reported-by: syzbot+515d5bcfe179cdf049b2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-10-19mm/memcontrol: update lruvec counters in mem_cgroup_move_accountKonstantin Khlebnikov
Mapped, dirty and writeback pages are also counted in per-lruvec stats. These counters needs update when page is moved between cgroups. Currently is nobody *consuming* the lruvec versions of these counters and that there is no user-visible effect. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/157112699975.7360.1062614888388489788.stgit@buzz Fixes: 00f3ca2c2d66 ("mm: memcontrol: per-lruvec stats infrastructure") Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-10-09locking/lockdep: Remove unused @nested argument from lock_release()Qian Cai
Since the following commit: b4adfe8e05f1 ("locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in __lock_release") @nested is no longer used in lock_release(), so remove it from all lock_release() calls and friends. Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: airlied@linux.ie Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: alexander.levin@microsoft.com Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net Cc: davem@davemloft.net Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: duyuyang@gmail.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: jack@suse.com Cc: jlbec@evilplan.or Cc: joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com Cc: joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com Cc: jslaby@suse.com Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com Cc: maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Cc: mark@fasheh.com Cc: mhocko@kernel.org Cc: mripard@kernel.org Cc: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com Cc: rodrigo.vivi@intel.com Cc: sean@poorly.run Cc: st@kernel.org Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: tytso@mit.edu Cc: vdavydov.dev@gmail.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1568909380-32199-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-10-07mm, memcg: proportional memory.{low,min} reclaimChris Down
cgroup v2 introduces two memory protection thresholds: memory.low (best-effort) and memory.min (hard protection). While they generally do what they say on the tin, there is a limitation in their implementation that makes them difficult to use effectively: that cliff behaviour often manifests when they become eligible for reclaim. This patch implements more intuitive and usable behaviour, where we gradually mount more reclaim pressure as cgroups further and further exceed their protection thresholds. This cliff edge behaviour happens because we only choose whether or not to reclaim based on whether the memcg is within its protection limits (see the use of mem_cgroup_protected in shrink_node), but we don't vary our reclaim behaviour based on this information. Imagine the following timeline, with the numbers the lruvec size in this zone: 1. memory.low=1000000, memory.current=999999. 0 pages may be scanned. 2. memory.low=1000000, memory.current=1000000. 0 pages may be scanned. 3. memory.low=1000000, memory.current=1000001. 1000001* pages may be scanned. (?!) * Of course, we won't usually scan all available pages in the zone even without this patch because of scan control priority, over-reclaim protection, etc. However, as shown by the tests at the end, these techniques don't sufficiently throttle such an extreme change in input, so cliff-like behaviour isn't really averted by their existence alone. Here's an example of how this plays out in practice. At Facebook, we are trying to protect various workloads from "system" software, like configuration management tools, metric collectors, etc (see this[0] case study). In order to find a suitable memory.low value, we start by determining the expected memory range within which the workload will be comfortable operating. This isn't an exact science -- memory usage deemed "comfortable" will vary over time due to user behaviour, differences in composition of work, etc, etc. As such we need to ballpark memory.low, but doing this is currently problematic: 1. If we end up setting it too low for the workload, it won't have *any* effect (see discussion above). The group will receive the full weight of reclaim and won't have any priority while competing with the less important system software, as if we had no memory.low configured at all. 2. Because of this behaviour, we end up erring on the side of setting it too high, such that the comfort range is reliably covered. However, protected memory is completely unavailable to the rest of the system, so we might cause undue memory and IO pressure there when we *know* we have some elasticity in the workload. 3. Even if we get the value totally right, smack in the middle of the comfort zone, we get extreme jumps between no pressure and full pressure that cause unpredictable pressure spikes in the workload due to the current binary reclaim behaviour. With this patch, we can set it to our ballpark estimation without too much worry. Any undesirable behaviour, such as too much or too little reclaim pressure on the workload or system will be proportional to how far our estimation is off. This means we can set memory.low much more conservatively and thus waste less resources *without* the risk of the workload falling off a cliff if we overshoot. As a more abstract technical description, this unintuitive behaviour results in having to give high-priority workloads a large protection buffer on top of their expected usage to function reliably, as otherwise we have abrupt periods of dramatically increased memory pressure which hamper performance. Having to set these thresholds so high wastes resources and generally works against the principle of work conservation. In addition, having proportional memory reclaim behaviour has other benefits. Most notably, before this patch it's basically mandatory to set memory.low to a higher than desirable value because otherwise as soon as you exceed memory.low, all protection is lost, and all pages are eligible to scan again. By contrast, having a gradual ramp in reclaim pressure means that you now still get some protection when thresholds are exceeded, which means that one can now be more comfortable setting memory.low to lower values without worrying that all protection will be lost. This is important because workingset size is really hard to know exactly, especially with variable workloads, so at least getting *some* protection if your workingset size grows larger than you expect increases user confidence in setting memory.low without a huge buffer on top being needed. Thanks a lot to Johannes Weiner and Tejun Heo for their advice and assistance in thinking about how to make this work better. In testing these changes, I intended to verify that: 1. Changes in page scanning become gradual and proportional instead of binary. To test this, I experimented stepping further and further down memory.low protection on a workload that floats around 19G workingset when under memory.low protection, watching page scan rates for the workload cgroup: +------------+-----------------+--------------------+--------------+ | memory.low | test (pgscan/s) | control (pgscan/s) | % of control | +------------+-----------------+--------------------+--------------+ | 21G | 0 | 0 | N/A | | 17G | 867 | 3799 | 23% | | 12G | 1203 | 3543 | 34% | | 8G | 2534 | 3979 | 64% | | 4G | 3980 | 4147 | 96% | | 0 | 3799 | 3980 | 95% | +------------+-----------------+--------------------+--------------+ As you can see, the test kernel (with a kernel containing this patch) ramps up page scanning significantly more gradually than the control kernel (without this patch). 2. More gradual ramp up in reclaim aggression doesn't result in premature OOMs. To test this, I wrote a script that slowly increments the number of pages held by stress(1)'s --vm-keep mode until a production system entered severe overall memory contention. This script runs in a highly protected slice taking up the majority of available system memory. Watching vmstat revealed that page scanning continued essentially nominally between test and control, without causing forward reclaim progress to become arrested. [0]: https://facebookmicrosites.github.io/cgroup2/docs/overview.html#case-study-the-fbtax2-project [akpm@linux-foundation.org: reflow block comments to fit in 80 cols] [chris@chrisdown.name: handle cgroup_disable=memory when getting memcg protection] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190201045711.GA18302@chrisdown.name Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190124014455.GA6396@chrisdown.name Signed-off-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-09-25memcg, kmem: do not fail __GFP_NOFAIL chargesMichal Hocko
Thomas has noticed the following NULL ptr dereference when using cgroup v1 kmem limit: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 3 PID: 16923 Comm: gtk-update-icon Not tainted 4.19.51 #42 Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. Z97X-Gaming G1/Z97X-Gaming G1, BIOS F9 07/31/2015 RIP: 0010:create_empty_buffers+0x24/0x100 Code: cd 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 49 89 d4 ba 01 00 00 00 55 53 48 89 fb e8 97 fe ff ff 48 89 c5 48 89 c2 eb 03 48 89 ca <48> 8b 4a 08 4c 09 22 48 85 c9 75 f1 48 89 6a 08 48 8b 43 18 48 8d RSP: 0018:ffff927ac1b37bf8 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: fffff2d4429fd740 RCX: 0000000100097149 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000082 RDI: ffff9075a99fbe00 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: fffff2d440949cc8 R09: 00000000000960c0 R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff907601f18360 R14: 0000000000002000 R15: 0000000000001000 FS: 00007fb55b288bc0(0000) GS:ffff90761f8c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 000000007aebc002 CR4: 00000000001606e0 Call Trace: create_page_buffers+0x4d/0x60 __block_write_begin_int+0x8e/0x5a0 ? ext4_inode_attach_jinode.part.82+0xb0/0xb0 ? jbd2__journal_start+0xd7/0x1f0 ext4_da_write_begin+0x112/0x3d0 generic_perform_write+0xf1/0x1b0 ? file_update_time+0x70/0x140 __generic_file_write_iter+0x141/0x1a0 ext4_file_write_iter+0xef/0x3b0 __vfs_write+0x17e/0x1e0 vfs_write+0xa5/0x1a0 ksys_write+0x57/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x55/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Tetsuo then noticed that this is because the __memcg_kmem_charge_memcg fails __GFP_NOFAIL charge when the kmem limit is reached. This is a wrong behavior because nofail allocations are not allowed to fail. Normal charge path simply forces the charge even if that means to cross the limit. Kmem accounting should be doing the same. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190906125608.32129-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reported-by: Thomas Lindroth <thomas.lindroth@gmail.com> Debugged-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Thomas Lindroth <thomas.lindroth@gmail.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-09-24mm: thp: make deferred split shrinker memcg awareYang Shi
Currently THP deferred split shrinker is not memcg aware, this may cause premature OOM with some configuration. For example the below test would run into premature OOM easily: $ cgcreate -g memory:thp $ echo 4G > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/thp/memory/limit_in_bytes $ cgexec -g memory:thp transhuge-stress 4000 transhuge-stress comes from kernel selftest. It is easy to hit OOM, but there are still a lot THP on the deferred split queue, memcg direct reclaim can't touch them since the deferred split shrinker is not memcg aware. Convert deferred split shrinker memcg aware by introducing per memcg deferred split queue. The THP should be on either per node or per memcg deferred split queue if it belongs to a memcg. When the page is immigrated to the other memcg, it will be immigrated to the target memcg's deferred split queue too. Reuse the second tail page's deferred_list for per memcg list since the same THP can't be on multiple deferred split queues. [yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com: simplify deferred split queue dereference per Kirill Tkhai] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1566496227-84952-5-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1565144277-36240-5-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-09-24mm: shrinker: make shrinker not depend on memcg kmemYang Shi
Currently shrinker is just allocated and can work when memcg kmem is enabled. But, THP deferred split shrinker is not slab shrinker, it doesn't make too much sense to have such shrinker depend on memcg kmem. It should be able to reclaim THP even though memcg kmem is disabled. Introduce a new shrinker flag, SHRINKER_NONSLAB, for non-slab shrinker. When memcg kmem is disabled, just such shrinkers can be called in shrinking memcg slab. [yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com: add comment] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1566496227-84952-4-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1565144277-36240-4-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-09-24memcg, kmem: deprecate kmem.limit_in_bytesMichal Hocko
Cgroup v1 memcg controller has exposed a dedicated kmem limit to users which turned out to be really a bad idea because there are paths which cannot shrink the kernel memory usage enough to get below the limit (e.g. because the accounted memory is not reclaimable). There are cases when the failure is even not allowed (e.g. __GFP_NOFAIL). This means that the kmem limit is in excess to the hard limit without any way to shrink and thus completely useless. OOM killer cannot be invoked to handle the situation because that would lead to a premature oom killing. As a result many places might see ENOMEM returning from kmalloc and result in unexpected errors. E.g. a global OOM killer when there is a lot of free memory because ENOMEM is translated into VM_FAULT_OOM in #PF path and therefore pagefault_out_of_memory would result in OOM killer. Please note that the kernel memory is still accounted to the overall limit along with the user memory so removing the kmem specific limit should still allow to contain kernel memory consumption. Unlike the kmem one, though, it invokes memory reclaim and targeted memcg oom killing if necessary. Start the deprecation process by crying to the kernel log. Let's see whether there are relevant usecases and simply return to EINVAL in the second stage if nobody complains in few releases. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak documentation text] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190911151612.GI4023@dhcp22.suse.cz Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Thomas Lindroth <thomas.lindroth@gmail.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-09-24mm/memcontrol.c: fix a -Wunused-function warningQian Cai
mem_cgroup_id_get() was introduced in commit 73f576c04b94 ("mm:memcontrol: fix cgroup creation failure after many small jobs"). Later, it no longer has any user since the commits, 1f47b61fb407 ("mm: memcontrol: fix swap counter leak on swapout from offline cgroup") 58fa2a5512d9 ("mm: memcontrol: add sanity checks for memcg->id.ref on get/put") so safe to remove it. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1568648453-5482-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>