summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/dsa/tag_8021q.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2023-04-23net: dsa: update TX path comments to not mention skb_mac_header()Vladimir Oltean
Once commit 6d1ccff62780 ("net: reset mac header in dev_start_xmit()") will be reverted, it will no longer be true that skb->data points at skb_mac_header(skb) - since the skb->mac_header will not be set - so stop saying that, and just say that it points to the MAC header. I've reviewed vlan_insert_tag() and it does not *actually* depend on skb_mac_header(), so reword that to avoid the confusion. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-12-13Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/netPaolo Abeni
Merge in the left-over fixes before the net-next pull-request. net/mptcp/subflow.c d3295fee3c75 ("mptcp: use proper req destructor for IPv6") 36b122baf6a8 ("mptcp: add subflow_v(4,6)_send_synack()") Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
2022-12-12net: dsa: tag_8021q: avoid leaking ctx on dsa_tag_8021q_register() error pathVladimir Oltean
If dsa_tag_8021q_setup() fails, for example due to the inability of the device to install a VLAN, the tag_8021q context of the switch will leak. Make sure it is freed on the error path. Fixes: 328621f6131f ("net: dsa: tag_8021q: absorb dsa_8021q_setup into dsa_tag_8021q_{,un}register") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209235242.480344-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-11-22net: dsa: kill off dsa_priv.hVladimir Oltean
The last remnants in dsa_priv.h are a netlink-related definition for which we create a new header, and DSA_MAX_NUM_OFFLOADING_BRIDGES which is only used from dsa.c, so move it there. Some inclusions need to be adjusted now that we no longer have headers included transitively from dsa_priv.h. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-11-22net: dsa: move tag_8021q headers to their proper placeVladimir Oltean
tag_8021q definitions are all over the place. Some are exported to linux/dsa/8021q.h (visible by DSA core, taggers, switch drivers and everyone else), and some are in dsa_priv.h. Move the structures that don't need external visibility into tag_8021q.c, and the ones which don't need the world or switch drivers to see them into tag_8021q.h. We also have the tag_8021q.h inclusion from switch.c, which is basically the entire reason why tag_8021q.c was built into DSA in commit 8b6e638b4be2 ("net: dsa: build tag_8021q.c as part of DSA core"). I still don't know how to better deal with that, so leave it alone. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-11-22net: dsa: move headers exported by switch.c to switch.hVladimir Oltean
Reduce code bloat in dsa_priv.h by moving the prototypes exported by switch.h into their own header file. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-11-22net: dsa: move tagging protocol code to tag.{c,h}Vladimir Oltean
It would be nice if tagging protocol drivers could include just the header they need, since they are (mostly) data path and isolated from most of the other DSA core code does. Create a tag.c and a tag.h file which are meant to support tagging protocol drivers. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-11-22net: dsa: move headers exported by port.c to port.hVladimir Oltean
Minimize the use of the bloated dsa_priv.h by moving the prototypes exported by port.c to their own header file. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-09-20net: dsa: introduce dsa_port_get_master()Vladimir Oltean
There is a desire to support for DSA masters in a LAG. That configuration is intended to work by simply enslaving the master to a bonding/team device. But the physical DSA master (the LAG slave) still has a dev->dsa_ptr, and that cpu_dp still corresponds to the physical CPU port. However, we would like to be able to retrieve the LAG that's the upper of the physical DSA master. In preparation for that, introduce a helper called dsa_port_get_master() that replaces all occurrences of the dp->cpu_dp->master pattern. The distinction between LAG and non-LAG will be made later within the helper itself. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
2022-08-22net: dsa: tag_8021q: remove old comment regarding dsa_8021q_netdev_opsVladimir Oltean
Since commit 129bd7ca8ac0 ("net: dsa: Prevent usage of NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q as tagging protocol"), dsa_8021q_netdev_ops no longer exists, so remove the comment that talks about it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818143808.2808393-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-04-20net: dsa: make cross-chip notifiers more efficient for host eventsVladimir Oltean
To determine whether a given port should react to the port targeted by the notifier, dsa_port_host_vlan_match() and dsa_port_host_address_match() look at the positioning of the switch port currently executing the notifier relative to the switch port for which the notifier was emitted. To maintain stylistic compatibility with the other match functions from switch.c, the host address and host VLAN match functions take the notifier information about targeted port, switch and tree indices as argument. However, these functions only use that information to retrieve the struct dsa_port *targeted_dp, which is an invariant for the outer loop that calls them. So it makes more sense to calculate the targeted dp only once, and pass it to them as argument. But furthermore, the targeted dp is actually known at the time the call to dsa_port_notify() is made. It is just that we decide to only save the indices of the port, switch and tree in the notifier structure, just to retrace our steps and find the dp again using dsa_switch_find() and dsa_to_port(). But both the above functions are relatively expensive, since they need to iterate through lists. It appears more straightforward to make all notifiers just pass the targeted dp inside their info structure, and have the code that needs the indices to look at info->dp->index instead of info->port, or info->dp->ds->index instead of info->sw_index, or info->dp->ds->dst->index instead of info->tree_index. For the sake of consistency, all cross-chip notifiers are converted to pass the "dp" directly. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-27net: dsa: tag_8021q: rename dsa_8021q_bridge_tx_fwd_offload_vidVladimir Oltean
The dsa_8021q_bridge_tx_fwd_offload_vid is no longer used just for bridge TX forwarding offload, it is the private VLAN reserved for VLAN-unaware bridging in a way that is compatible with FDB isolation. So just rename it dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_vid. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-27net: dsa: tag_8021q: merge RX and TX VLANsVladimir Oltean
In the old Shared VLAN Learning mode of operation that tag_8021q previously used for forwarding, we needed to have distinct concepts for an RX and a TX VLAN. An RX VLAN could be installed on all ports that were members of a given bridge, so that autonomous forwarding could still work, while a TX VLAN was dedicated for precise packet steering, so it just contained the CPU port and one egress port. Now that tag_8021q uses Independent VLAN Learning and imprecise RX/TX all over, those lines have been blurred and we no longer have the need to do precise TX towards a port that is in a bridge. As for standalone ports, it is fine to use the same VLAN ID for both RX and TX. This patch changes the tag_8021q format by shifting the VLAN range it reserves, and halving it. Previously, our DIR bits were encoding the VLAN direction (RX/TX) and were set to either 1 or 2. This meant that tag_8021q reserved 2K VLANs, or 50% of the available range. Change the DIR bits to a hardcoded value of 3 now, which makes tag_8021q reserve only 1K VLANs, and a different range now (the last 1K). This is done so that we leave the old format in place in case we need to return to it. In terms of code, the vid_is_dsa_8021q_rxvlan and vid_is_dsa_8021q_txvlan functions go away. Any vid_is_dsa_8021q is both a TX and an RX VLAN, and they are no longer distinct. For example, felix which did different things for different VLAN types, now needs to handle the RX and the TX logic for the same VLAN. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-27net: dsa: tag_8021q: add support for imprecise RX based on the VBIDVladimir Oltean
The sja1105 switch can't populate the PORT field of the tag_8021q header when sending a frame to the CPU with a non-zero VBID. Similar to dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid() which performs imprecise RX for VLAN-aware bridges, let's introduce a helper in tag_8021q for performing imprecise RX based on the VLAN that it has allocated for a VLAN-unaware bridge. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-27net: dsa: tag_8021q: replace the SVL bridging with VLAN-unaware IVL bridgingVladimir Oltean
For VLAN-unaware bridging, tag_8021q uses something perhaps a bit too tied with the sja1105 switch: each port uses the same pvid which is also used for standalone operation (a unique one from which the source port and device ID can be retrieved when packets from that port are forwarded to the CPU). Since each port has a unique pvid when performing autonomous forwarding, the switch must be configured for Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) such that the VLAN ID itself is ignored when performing FDB lookups. Without SVL, packets would always be flooded, since FDB lookup in the source port's VLAN would never find any entry. First of all, to make tag_8021q more palatable to switches which might not support Shared VLAN Learning, let's just use a common VLAN for all ports that are under the same bridge. Secondly, using Shared VLAN Learning means that FDB isolation can never be enforced. But if all ports under the same VLAN-unaware bridge share the same VLAN ID, it can. The disadvantage is that the CPU port can no longer perform precise source port identification for these packets. But at least we have a mechanism which has proven to be adequate for that situation: imprecise RX (dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid), which is what we use for termination on VLAN-aware bridges. The VLAN ID that VLAN-unaware bridges will use with tag_8021q is the same one as we were previously using for imprecise TX (bridge TX forwarding offload). It is already allocated, it is just a matter of using it. Note that because now all ports under the same bridge share the same VLAN, the complexity of performing a tag_8021q bridge join decreases dramatically. We no longer have to install the RX VLAN of a newly joining port into the port membership of the existing bridge ports. The newly joining port just becomes a member of the VLAN corresponding to that bridge, and the other ports are already members of it from when they joined the bridge themselves. So forwarding works properly. This means that we can unhook dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_{join,leave} from the cross-chip notifier level dsa_switch_bridge_{join,leave}. We can put these calls directly into the sja1105 driver. With this new mode of operation, a port controlled by tag_8021q can have two pvids whereas before it could only have one. The pvid for standalone operation is different from the pvid used for VLAN-unaware bridging. This is done, again, so that FDB isolation can be enforced. Let tag_8021q manage this by deleting the standalone pvid when a port joins a bridge, and restoring it when it leaves it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-16net: dsa: tag_8021q: only call skb_push/skb_pull around __skb_vlan_popVladimir Oltean
__skb_vlan_pop() needs skb->data to point at the mac_header, while skb_vlan_tag_present() and skb_vlan_tag_get() don't, because they don't look at skb->data at all. So we can avoid uselessly moving around skb->data for the case where the VLAN tag was offloaded by the DSA master. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220215204722.2134816-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-12-08net: dsa: keep the bridge_dev and bridge_num as part of the same structureVladimir Oltean
The main desire behind this is to provide coherent bridge information to the fast path without locking. For example, right now we set dp->bridge_dev and dp->bridge_num from separate code paths, it is theoretically possible for a packet transmission to read these two port properties consecutively and find a bridge number which does not correspond with the bridge device. Another desire is to start passing more complex bridge information to dsa_switch_ops functions. For example, with FDB isolation, it is expected that drivers will need to be passed the bridge which requested an FDB/MDB entry to be offloaded, and along with that bridge_dev, the associated bridge_num should be passed too, in case the driver might want to implement an isolation scheme based on that number. We already pass the {bridge_dev, bridge_num} pair to the TX forwarding offload switch API, however we'd like to remove that and squash it into the basic bridge join/leave API. So that means we need to pass this pair to the bridge join/leave API. During dsa_port_bridge_leave, first we unset dp->bridge_dev, then we call the driver's .port_bridge_leave with what used to be our dp->bridge_dev, but provided as an argument. When bridge_dev and bridge_num get folded into a single structure, we need to preserve this behavior in dsa_port_bridge_leave: we need a copy of what used to be in dp->bridge. Switch drivers check bridge membership by comparing dp->bridge_dev with the provided bridge_dev, but now, if we provide the struct dsa_bridge as a pointer, they cannot keep comparing dp->bridge to the provided pointer, since this only points to an on-stack copy. To make this obvious and prevent driver writers from forgetting and doing stupid things, in this new API, the struct dsa_bridge is provided as a full structure (not very large, contains an int and a pointer) instead of a pointer. An explicit comparison function needs to be used to determine bridge membership: dsa_port_offloads_bridge(). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-12-08net: dsa: hide dp->bridge_dev and dp->bridge_num in the core behind helpersVladimir Oltean
The location of the bridge device pointer and number is going to change. It is not going to be kept individually per port, but in a common structure allocated dynamically and which will have lockdep validation. Create helpers to access these elements so that we have a migration path to the new organization. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-12-08net: dsa: make dp->bridge_num one-basedVladimir Oltean
I have seen too many bugs already due to the fact that we must encode an invalid dp->bridge_num as a negative value, because the natural tendency is to check that invalid value using (!dp->bridge_num). Latest example can be seen in commit 1bec0f05062c ("net: dsa: fix bridge_num not getting cleared after ports leaving the bridge"). Convert the existing users to assume that dp->bridge_num == 0 is the encoding for invalid, and valid bridge numbers start from 1. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-10-21net: dsa: tag_8021q: make dsa_8021q_{rx,tx}_vid take dp as argumentVladimir Oltean
Pass a single argument to dsa_8021q_rx_vid and dsa_8021q_tx_vid that contains the necessary information from the two arguments that are currently provided: the switch and the port number. Also rename those functions so that they have a dsa_port_* prefix, since they operate on a struct dsa_port *. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-10-21net: dsa: convert cross-chip notifiers to iterate using dpVladimir Oltean
The majority of cross-chip switch notifiers need to filter in some way over the type of ports: some install VLANs etc on all cascade ports. The difference is that the matching function, which filters by port type, is separate from the function where the iteration happens. So this patch needs to refactor the matching functions' prototypes as well, to take the dp as argument. In a future patch/series, I might convert dsa_towards_port to return a struct dsa_port *dp too, but at the moment it is a bit entangled with dsa_routing_port which is also used by mv88e6xxx and they both return an int port. So keep dsa_towards_port the way it is and convert it into a dp using dsa_to_port. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-09-29net/dsa/tag_8021q.c: remove superfluous headersMianhan Liu
tag_8021q.c hasn't use any macro or function declared in linux/if_bridge.h. Thus, these files can be removed from tag_8021q.c safely without affecting the compilation of the ./net/dsa module Signed-off-by: Mianhan Liu <liumh1@shanghaitech.edu.cn> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-08-16net: dsa: tag_8021q: fix notifiers broadcast when they shouldn't, and vice versaVladimir Oltean
During the development of the blamed patch, the "bool broadcast" argument of dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_{add,del} was originally called "bool local", and the meaning was the exact opposite. Due to a rookie mistake where the patch was modified at the last minute without retesting, the instances of dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_{add,del} are called with the wrong values. During setup and teardown, cross-chip notifiers should not be broadcast to all DSA trees, while during bridging, they should. Fixes: 724395f4dc95 ("net: dsa: tag_8021q: don't broadcast during setup/teardown") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-08-12net: dsa: tag_8021q: don't broadcast during setup/teardownVladimir Oltean
Currently, on my board with multiple sja1105 switches in disjoint trees described in commit f66a6a69f97a ("net: dsa: permit cross-chip bridging between all trees in the system"), rebooting the board triggers the following benign warnings: [ 12.345566] sja1105 spi2.0: port 0 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 1088 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.353804] sja1105 spi2.0: port 0 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 2112 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.362019] sja1105 spi2.0: port 1 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 1089 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.370246] sja1105 spi2.0: port 1 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 2113 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.378466] sja1105 spi2.0: port 2 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 1090 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.386683] sja1105 spi2.0: port 2 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 2114 deletion: -ENOENT Basically switch 1 calls dsa_tag_8021q_unregister, and switch 1's TX and RX VLANs cannot be found on switch 2's CPU port. But why would switch 2 even attempt to delete switch 1's TX and RX tag_8021q VLANs from its CPU port? Well, because we use dsa_broadcast, and it is supposed that it had added those VLANs in the first place (because in dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_match, all CPU ports match regardless of their tree index or switch index). The two trees probe asynchronously, and when switch 1 probed, it called dsa_broadcast which did not notify the tree of switch 2, because that didn't probe yet. But during unbind, switch 2's tree _is_ probed, so it _is_ notified of the deletion. Before jumping to introduce a synchronization mechanism between the probing across disjoint switch trees, let's take a step back and see whether we _need_ to do that in the first place. The RX and TX VLANs of switch 1 would be needed on switch 2's CPU port only if switch 1 and 2 were part of a cross-chip bridge. And dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_join takes care precisely of that (but if probing was synchronous, the bridge_join would just end up bumping the VLANs' refcount, because they are already installed by the setup path). Since by the time the ports are bridged, all DSA trees are already set up, and we don't need the tag_8021q VLANs of one switch installed on the other switches during probe time, the answer is that we don't need to fix the synchronization issue. So make the setup and teardown code paths call dsa_port_notify, which notifies only the local tree, and the bridge code paths call dsa_broadcast, which let the other trees know as well. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-26net: dsa: sja1105: add bridge TX data plane offload based on tag_8021qVladimir Oltean
The main desire for having this feature in sja1105 is to support network stack termination for traffic coming from a VLAN-aware bridge. For sja1105, offloading the bridge data plane means sending packets as-is, with the proper VLAN tag, to the chip. The chip will look up its FDB and forward them to the correct destination port. But we support bridge data plane offload even for VLAN-unaware bridges, and the implementation there is different. In fact, VLAN-unaware bridging is governed by tag_8021q, so it makes sense to have the .bridge_fwd_offload_add() implementation fully within tag_8021q. The key difference is that we only support 1 VLAN-aware bridge, but we support multiple VLAN-unaware bridges. So we need to make sure that the forwarding domain is not crossed by packets injected from the stack. For this, we introduce the concept of a tag_8021q TX VLAN for bridge forwarding offload. As opposed to the regular TX VLANs which contain only 2 ports (the user port and the CPU port), a bridge data plane TX VLAN is "multicast" (or "imprecise"): it contains all the ports that are part of a certain bridge, and the hardware will select where the packet goes within this "imprecise" forwarding domain. Each VLAN-unaware bridge has its own "imprecise" TX VLAN, so we make use of the unique "bridge_num" provided by DSA for the data plane offload. We use the same 3 bits from the tag_8021q VLAN ID format to encode this bridge number. Note that these 3 bit positions have been used before for sub-VLANs in best-effort VLAN filtering mode. The difference is that for best-effort, the sub-VLANs were only valid on RX (and it was documented that the sub-VLAN field needed to be transmitted as zero). Whereas for the bridge data plane offload, these 3 bits are only valid on TX. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-20net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier supportVladimir Oltean
The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-20net: dsa: tag_8021q: manage RX VLANs dynamically at bridge join/leave timeVladimir Oltean
There has been at least one wasted opportunity for tag_8021q to be used by a driver: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200710113611.3398-3-kurt@linutronix.de/#2484272 because of a design decision: the declared purpose of tag_8021q is to offer source port/switch identification for a tagging driver for packets coming from a switch with no hardware DSA tagging support. It is not intended to provide VLAN-based port isolation, because its first user, sja1105, had another mechanism for bridging domain isolation, the L2 Forwarding Table. So even if 2 ports are in the same VLAN but they are separated via the L2 Forwarding Table, they will not communicate with one another. The L2 Forwarding Table is managed by the sja1105_bridge_join() and sja1105_bridge_leave() methods. As a consequence, today tag_8021q does not bother too much with hooking into .port_bridge_join() and .port_bridge_leave() because that would introduce yet another degree of freedom, it just iterates statically through all ports of a switch and adds the RX VLAN of one port to all the others. In this way, whenever .port_bridge_join() is called, bridging will magically work because the RX VLANs are already installed everywhere they need to be. This is not to say that the reason for the change in this patch is to satisfy the hellcreek and similar use cases, that is merely a nice side effect. Instead it is to make sja1105 cross-chip links work properly over a DSA link. For context, sja1105 today supports a degenerate form of cross-chip bridging, where the switches are interconnected through their CPU ports ("disjoint trees" topology). There is some code which has been generalized into dsa_8021q_crosschip_link_{add,del}, but it is not enough, and frankly it is impossible to build upon that. Real multi-switch DSA trees, like daisy chains or H trees, which have actual DSA links, do not work. The problem is that sja1105 is unlike mv88e6xxx, and does not have a PVT for cross-chip bridging, which is a table by which the local switch can select the forwarding domain for packets from a certain ingress switch ID and source port. The sja1105 switches cannot parse their own DSA tags, because, well, they don't really have support for DSA tags, it's all VLANs. So to make something like cross-chip bridging between sw0p0 and sw1p0 to work over the sw0p3/sw1p3 DSA link to work with sja1105 in the topology below: | | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 [ user ] [ user ] [ cpu ] [ dsa ] ---- [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ user ] [ user ] we need to ask ourselves 2 questions: (1) how should the L2 Forwarding Table be managed? (2) how should the VLAN Lookup Table be managed? i.e. what should prevent packets from going to unwanted ports? Since as mentioned, there is no PVT, the L2 Forwarding Table only contains forwarding rules for local ports. So we can say "all user ports are allowed to forward to all CPU ports and all DSA links". If we allow forwarding to DSA links unconditionally, this means we must prevent forwarding using the VLAN Lookup Table. This is in fact asymmetric with what we do for tag_8021q on ports local to the same switch, and it matters because now that we are making tag_8021q a core DSA feature, we need to hook into .crosschip_bridge_join() to add/remove the tag_8021q VLANs. So for symmetry it makes sense to manage the VLANs for local forwarding in the same way as cross-chip forwarding. Note that there is a very precise reason why tag_8021q hooks into dsa_switch_bridge_join() which acts at the cross-chip notifier level, and not at a higher level such as dsa_port_bridge_join(). We need to install the RX VLAN of the newly joining port into the VLAN table of all the existing ports across the tree that are part of the same bridge, and the notifier already does the iteration through the switches for us. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-20net: dsa: tag_8021q: absorb dsa_8021q_setup into dsa_tag_8021q_{,un}registerVladimir Oltean
Right now, setting up tag_8021q is a 2-step operation for a driver, first the context structure needs to be created, then the VLANs need to be installed on the ports. A similar thing is true for teardown. Merge the 2 steps into the register/unregister methods, to be as transparent as possible for the driver as to what tag_8021q does behind the scenes. This also gets rid of the funny "bool setup == true means setup, == false means teardown" API that tag_8021q used to expose. Note that dsa_tag_8021q_register() must be called at least in the .setup() driver method and never earlier (like in the driver probe function). This is because the DSA switch tree is not initialized at probe time, and the cross-chip notifiers will not work. For symmetry with .setup(), the unregister method should be put in .teardown(). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-20net: dsa: make tag_8021q operations part of the coreVladimir Oltean
Make tag_8021q a more central element of DSA and move the 2 driver specific operations outside of struct dsa_8021q_context (which is supposed to hold dynamic data and not really constant function pointers). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-20net: dsa: let the core manage the tag_8021q contextVladimir Oltean
The basic problem description is as follows: Be there 3 switches in a daisy chain topology: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] The CPU will not be able to ping through the user ports of the bottom-most switch (like for example sw2p0), simply because tag_8021q was not coded up for this scenario - it has always assumed DSA switch trees with a single switch. To add support for the topology above, we must admit that the RX VLAN of sw2p0 must be added on some ports of switches 0 and 1 as well. This is in fact a textbook example of thing that can use the cross-chip notifier framework that DSA has set up in switch.c. There is only one problem: core DSA (switch.c) is not able right now to make the connection between a struct dsa_switch *ds and a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx. Right now, it is drivers who call into tag_8021q.c and always provide a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx pointer, and tag_8021q.c calls them back with the .tag_8021q_vlan_{add,del} methods. But with cross-chip notifiers, it is possible for tag_8021q to call drivers without drivers having ever asked for anything. A good example is right above: when sw2p0 wants to set itself up for tag_8021q, the .tag_8021q_vlan_add method needs to be called for switches 1 and 0, so that they transport sw2p0's VLANs towards the CPU without dropping them. So instead of letting drivers manage the tag_8021q context, add a tag_8021q_ctx pointer inside of struct dsa_switch, which will be populated when dsa_tag_8021q_register() returns success. The patch is fairly long-winded because we are partly reverting commit 5899ee367ab3 ("net: dsa: tag_8021q: add a context structure") which made the driver-facing tag_8021q API use "ctx" instead of "ds". Now that we can access "ctx" directly from "ds", this is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-20net: dsa: build tag_8021q.c as part of DSA coreVladimir Oltean
Upcoming patches will add tag_8021q related logic to switch.c and port.c, in order to allow it to make use of cross-chip notifiers. In addition, a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx pointer will be added to struct dsa_switch. It seems fairly low-reward to #ifdef the *ctx from struct dsa_switch and to provide shim implementations of the entire tag_8021q.c calling surface (not even clear what to do about the tag_8021q cross-chip notifiers to avoid compiling them). The runtime overhead for switches which don't use tag_8021q is fairly small because all helpers will check for ds->tag_8021q_ctx being a NULL pointer and stop there. So let's make it part of dsa_core.o. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-20net: dsa: tag_8021q: create dsa_tag_8021q_{register,unregister} helpersVladimir Oltean
In preparation of moving tag_8021q to core DSA, move all initialization and teardown related to tag_8021q which is currently done by drivers in 2 functions called "register" and "unregister". These will gather more functionality in future patches, which will better justify the chosen naming scheme. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-20net: dsa: tag_8021q: use symbolic error namesVladimir Oltean
Use %pe to give the user a string holding the error code instead of just a number. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-20net: dsa: tag_8021q: use "err" consistently instead of "rc"Vladimir Oltean
Some of the tag_8021q code has been taken out of sja1105, which uses "rc" for its return code variables, whereas the DSA core uses "err". Change tag_8021q for consistency. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-20net: dsa: sja1105: delete the best_effort_vlan_filtering modeVladimir Oltean
Simply put, the best-effort VLAN filtering mode relied on VLAN retagging from a bridge VLAN towards a tag_8021q sub-VLAN in order to be able to decode the source port in the tagger, but the VLAN retagging implementation inside the sja1105 chips is not the best and we were relying on marginal operating conditions. The most notable limitation of the best-effort VLAN filtering mode is its incapacity to treat this case properly: ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 ip link set swp2 master br0 ip link set swp4 master br0 bridge vlan del dev swp4 vid 1 bridge vlan add dev swp4 vid 1 pvid When sending an untagged packet through swp2, the expectation is for it to be forwarded to swp4 as egress-tagged (so it will contain VLAN ID 1 on egress). But the switch will send it as egress-untagged. There was an attempt to fix this here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210407201452.1703261-2-olteanv@gmail.com/ but it failed miserably because it broke PTP RX timestamping, in a way that cannot be corrected due to hardware issues related to VLAN retagging. So with either PTP broken or pushing VLAN headers on egress for untagged packets being broken, the sad reality is that the best-effort VLAN filtering code is broken. Delete it. Note that this means there will be a temporary loss of functionality in this driver until it is replaced with something better (network stack RX/TX capability for "mode 2" as described in Documentation/networking/dsa/sja1105.rst, the "port under VLAN-aware bridge" case). We simply cannot keep this code until that driver rework is done, it is super bloated and tangled with tag_8021q. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11net: dsa: tag_8021q: refactor RX VLAN parsing into a dedicated functionVladimir Oltean
The added value of this function is that it can deal with both the case where the VLAN header is in the skb head, as well as in the offload field. This is something I was not able to do using other functions in the network stack. Since both ocelot-8021q and sja1105 need to do the same stuff, let's make it a common service provided by tag_8021q. This is done as refactoring for the new SJA1110 tagger, which partly uses tag_8021q as well (just like SJA1105), and will be the third caller. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-01net: dsa: tag_8021q: fix the VLAN IDs used for encoding sub-VLANsVladimir Oltean
When using sub-VLANs in the range of 1-7, the resulting value from: rx_vid = dsa_8021q_rx_vid_subvlan(ds, port, subvlan); is wrong according to the description from tag_8021q.c: | 11 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +-----------+-----+-----------------+-----------+-----------------------+ | DIR | SVL | SWITCH_ID | SUBVLAN | PORT | +-----------+-----+-----------------+-----------+-----------------------+ For example, when ds->index == 0, port == 3 and subvlan == 1, dsa_8021q_rx_vid_subvlan() returns 1027, same as it returns for subvlan == 0, but it should have returned 1043. This is because the low portion of the subvlan bits are not masked properly when writing into the 12-bit VLAN value. They are masked into bits 4:3, but they should be masked into bits 5:4. Fixes: 3eaae1d05f2b ("net: dsa: tag_8021q: support up to 8 VLANs per port using sub-VLANs") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-01-29net: dsa: tag_8021q: add helpers to deduce whether a VLAN ID is RX or TX VLANVladimir Oltean
The sja1105 implementation can be blind about this, but the felix driver doesn't do exactly what it's being told, so it needs to know whether it is a TX or an RX VLAN, so it can install the appropriate type of TCAM rule. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2020-09-20net: dsa: tag_8021q: add VLANs to the master interface tooVladimir Oltean
The whole purpose of tag_8021q is to send VLAN-tagged traffic to the CPU, from which the driver can decode the source port and switch id. Currently this only works if the VLAN filtering on the master is disabled. Change that by explicitly adding code to tag_8021q.c to add the VLANs corresponding to the tags to the filter of the master interface. Because we now need to call vlan_vid_add, then we also need to hold the RTNL mutex. Propagate that requirement to the callers of dsa_8021q_setup and modify the existing call sites as appropriate. Note that one call path, sja1105_best_effort_vlan_filtering_set -> sja1105_vlan_filtering -> sja1105_setup_8021q_tagging, was already holding this lock. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-09-11net: dsa: tag_8021q: add a context structureVladimir Oltean
While working on another tag_8021q driver implementation, some things became apparent: - It is not mandatory for a DSA driver to offload the tag_8021q VLANs by using the VLAN table per se. For example, it can add custom TCAM rules that simply encapsulate RX traffic, and redirect & decapsulate rules for TX traffic. For such a driver, it makes no sense to receive the tag_8021q configuration through the same callback as it receives the VLAN configuration from the bridge and the 8021q modules. - Currently, sja1105 (the only tag_8021q user) sets a priv->expect_dsa_8021q variable to distinguish between the bridge calling, and tag_8021q calling. That can be improved, to say the least. - The crosschip bridging operations are, in fact, stateful already. The list of crosschip_links must be kept by the caller and passed to the relevant tag_8021q functions. So it would be nice if the tag_8021q configuration was more self-contained. This patch attempts to do that. Create a struct dsa_8021q_context which encapsulates a struct dsa_switch, and has 2 function pointers for adding and deleting a VLAN. These will replace the previous channel to the driver, which was through the .port_vlan_add and .port_vlan_del callbacks of dsa_switch_ops. Also put the list of crosschip_links into this dsa_8021q_context. Drivers that don't support cross-chip bridging can simply omit to initialize this list, as long as they dont call any cross-chip function. The sja1105_vlan_add and sja1105_vlan_del functions are refactored into a smaller sja1105_vlan_add_one, which now has 2 entry points: - sja1105_vlan_add, from struct dsa_switch_ops - sja1105_dsa_8021q_vlan_add, from the tag_8021q ops But even this change is fairly trivial. It just reflects the fact that for sja1105, the VLANs from these 2 channels end up in the same hardware table. However that is not necessarily true in the general sense (and that's the reason for making this change). The rest of the patch is mostly plain refactoring of "ds" -> "ctx". The dsa_8021q_context structure needs to be propagated because adding a VLAN is now done through the ops function pointers inside of it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-09-11net: dsa: tag_8021q: setup tagging via a single function callVladimir Oltean
There is no point in calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging for each individual port. Additionally, it will become more difficult to do that when we'll have a context structure to tag_8021q (next patch). So refactor this now. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-05-29net: dsa: tag_8021q: stop restoring VLANs from bridgeVladimir Oltean
Right now, our only tag_8021q user, sja1105, has the ability to restore bridge VLANs on its own, so this logic is unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-05-12net: dsa: tag_8021q: support up to 8 VLANs per port using sub-VLANsVladimir Oltean
For switches that support VLAN retagging, such as sja1105, we extend dsa_8021q by encoding a "sub-VLAN" into the remaining 3 free bits in the dsa_8021q tag. A sub-VLAN is nothing more than a number in the range 0-7, which serves as an index into a per-port driver lookup table. The sub-VLAN value of zero means that traffic is untagged (this is also backwards-compatible with dsa_8021q without retagging). The switch should be configured to retag VLAN-tagged traffic that gets transmitted towards the CPU port (and towards the CPU only). Example: bridge vlan add dev sw1p0 vid 100 The switch retags frames received on port 0, going to the CPU, and having VID 100, to the VID of 1104 (0x0450). In dsa_8021q language: | 11 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +-----------+-----+-----------------+-----------+-----------------------+ | DIR | SVL | SWITCH_ID | SUBVLAN | PORT | +-----------+-----+-----------------+-----------+-----------------------+ 0x0450 means: - DIR = 0b01: this is an RX VLAN - SUBVLAN = 0b001: this is subvlan #1 - SWITCH_ID = 0b001: this is switch 1 (see the name "sw1p0") - PORT = 0b0000: this is port 0 (see the name "sw1p0") The driver also remembers the "1 -> 100" mapping. In the hotpath, if the sub-VLAN from the tag encodes a non-untagged frame, this mapping is used to create a VLAN hwaccel tag, with the value of 100. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-05-12net: dsa: sja1105: save/restore VLANs using a delta commit methodVladimir Oltean
Managing the VLAN table that is present in hardware will become very difficult once we add a third operating state (best_effort_vlan_filtering). That is because correct cleanup (not too little, not too much) becomes virtually impossible, when VLANs can be added from the bridge layer, from dsa_8021q for basic tagging, for cross-chip bridging, as well as retagging rules for sub-VLANs and cross-chip sub-VLANs. So we need to rethink VLAN interaction with the switch in a more scalable way. In preparation for that, use the priv->expect_dsa_8021q boolean to classify any VLAN request received through .port_vlan_add or .port_vlan_del towards either one of 2 internal lists: bridge VLANs and dsa_8021q VLANs. Then, implement a central sja1105_build_vlan_table method that creates a VLAN configuration from scratch based on the 2 lists of VLANs kept by the driver, and based on the VLAN awareness state. Currently, if we are VLAN-unaware, install the dsa_8021q VLANs, otherwise the bridge VLANs. Then, implement a delta commit procedure that identifies which VLANs from this new configuration are actually different from the config previously committed to hardware. We apply the delta through the dynamic configuration interface (we don't reset the switch). The result is that the hardware should see the exact sequence of operations as before this patch. This also helps remove the "br" argument passed to dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join, which it was only using to figure out whether it should commit the configuration back to us or not, based on the VLAN awareness state of the bridge. We can simplify that, by always allowing those VLANs inside of our dsa_8021q_vlans list, and committing those to hardware when necessary. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-05-12net: dsa: tag_8021q: introduce a vid_is_dsa_8021q helperVladimir Oltean
This function returns a boolean denoting whether the VLAN passed as argument is part of the 1024-3071 range that the dsa_8021q tagging scheme uses. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-05-10net: dsa: sja1105: implement cross-chip bridging operationsVladimir Oltean
sja1105 uses dsa_8021q for DSA tagging, a format which is VLAN at heart and which is compatible with cascading. A complete description of this tagging format is in net/dsa/tag_8021q.c, but a quick summary is that each external-facing port tags incoming frames with a unique pvid, and this special VLAN is transmitted as tagged towards the inside of the system, and as untagged towards the exterior. The tag encodes the switch id and the source port index. This means that cross-chip bridging for dsa_8021q only entails adding the dsa_8021q pvids of one switch to the RX filter of the other switches. Everything else falls naturally into place, as long as the bottom-end of ports (the leaves in the tree) is comprised exclusively of dsa_8021q-compatible (i.e. sja1105 switches). Otherwise, there would be a chance that a front-panel switch transmits a packet tagged with a dsa_8021q header, header which it wouldn't be able to remove, and which would hence "leak" out. The only use case I tested (due to lack of board availability) was when the sja1105 switches are part of disjoint trees (however, this doesn't change the fact that multiple sja1105 switches still need unique switch identifiers in such a system). But in principle, even "true" single-tree setups (with DSA links) should work just as fine, except for a small change which I can't test: dsa_towards_port should be used instead of dsa_upstream_port (I made the assumption that the routing port that any sja1105 should use towards its neighbours is the CPU port. That might not hold true in other setups). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2020-03-24net: dsa: tag_8021q: replace dsa_8021q_remove_header with __skb_vlan_popVladimir Oltean
Not only did this wheel did not need reinventing, but there is also an issue with it: It doesn't remove the VLAN header in a way that preserves the L2 payload checksum when that is being provided by the DSA master hw. It should recalculate checksum both for the push, before removing the header, and for the pull afterwards. But the current implementation is quite dizzying, with pulls followed immediately afterwards by pushes, the memmove is done before the push, etc. This makes a DSA master with RX checksumming offload to print stack traces with the infamous 'hw csum failure' message. So remove the dsa_8021q_remove_header function and replace it with something that actually works with inet checksumming. Fixes: d461933638ae ("net: dsa: tag_8021q: Create helper function for removing VLAN header") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-11-16Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/netDavid S. Miller
Lots of overlapping changes and parallel additions, stuff like that. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-11-16net: dsa: tag_8021q: Fix dsa_8021q_restore_pvid for an absent pvidVladimir Oltean
This sequence of operations: ip link set dev br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 bridge vlan del dev swp2 vid 1 ip link set dev br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 ip link set dev br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 0 apparently fails with the message: [ 31.305716] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config. Reason: VLAN filtering [ 31.322161] sja1105 spi0.1: Couldn't determine PVID attributes (pvid 0) [ 31.328939] sja1105 spi0.1: Failed to setup VLAN tagging for port 1: -2 [ 31.335599] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 31.340215] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 194 at net/switchdev/switchdev.c:157 switchdev_port_attr_set_now+0x9c/0xa4 [ 31.349981] br0: Commit of attribute (id=6) failed. [ 31.354890] Modules linked in: [ 31.357942] CPU: 1 PID: 194 Comm: ip Not tainted 5.4.0-rc6-01792-gf4f632e07665-dirty #2062 [ 31.366167] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 31.370437] [<c03144dc>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030e184>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 31.378153] [<c030e184>] (show_stack) from [<c11d1c1c>] (dump_stack+0xe0/0x10c) [ 31.385437] [<c11d1c1c>] (dump_stack) from [<c034c730>] (__warn+0xf4/0x10c) [ 31.392373] [<c034c730>] (__warn) from [<c034c7bc>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x74/0xb8) [ 31.399827] [<c034c7bc>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<c11ca204>] (switchdev_port_attr_set_now+0x9c/0xa4) [ 31.409097] [<c11ca204>] (switchdev_port_attr_set_now) from [<c117036c>] (__br_vlan_filter_toggle+0x6c/0x118) [ 31.418971] [<c117036c>] (__br_vlan_filter_toggle) from [<c115d010>] (br_changelink+0xf8/0x518) [ 31.427637] [<c115d010>] (br_changelink) from [<c0f8e9ec>] (__rtnl_newlink+0x3f4/0x76c) [ 31.435613] [<c0f8e9ec>] (__rtnl_newlink) from [<c0f8eda8>] (rtnl_newlink+0x44/0x60) [ 31.443329] [<c0f8eda8>] (rtnl_newlink) from [<c0f89f20>] (rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x2cc/0x51c) [ 31.451477] [<c0f89f20>] (rtnetlink_rcv_msg) from [<c1008df8>] (netlink_rcv_skb+0xb8/0x110) [ 31.459796] [<c1008df8>] (netlink_rcv_skb) from [<c1008648>] (netlink_unicast+0x17c/0x1f8) [ 31.468026] [<c1008648>] (netlink_unicast) from [<c1008980>] (netlink_sendmsg+0x2bc/0x3b4) [ 31.476261] [<c1008980>] (netlink_sendmsg) from [<c0f43858>] (___sys_sendmsg+0x230/0x250) [ 31.484408] [<c0f43858>] (___sys_sendmsg) from [<c0f44c84>] (__sys_sendmsg+0x50/0x8c) [ 31.492209] [<c0f44c84>] (__sys_sendmsg) from [<c0301000>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28) [ 31.500090] Exception stack(0xedf47fa8 to 0xedf47ff0) [ 31.505122] 7fa0: 00000002 b6f2e060 00000003 beabd6a4 00000000 00000000 [ 31.513265] 7fc0: 00000002 b6f2e060 5d6e3213 00000128 00000000 00000001 00000006 000619c4 [ 31.521405] 7fe0: 00086078 beabd658 0005edbc b6e7ce68 The reason is the implementation of br_get_pvid: static inline u16 br_get_pvid(const struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg) { if (!vg) return 0; smp_rmb(); return vg->pvid; } Since VID 0 is an invalid pvid from the bridge's point of view, let's add this check in dsa_8021q_restore_pvid to avoid restoring a pvid that doesn't really exist. Fixes: 5f33183b7fdf ("net: dsa: tag_8021q: Restore bridge VLANs when enabling vlan_filtering") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-11-12net: dsa: Prevent usage of NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q as tagging protocolFlorian Fainelli
It is possible for a switch driver to use NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q as a valid DSA tagging protocol since it registers itself as such, unfortunately since there are not xmit or rcv functions provided, the lack of a xmit() function will lead to a NPD in dsa_slave_xmit() to start with. net/dsa/tag_8021q.c is only comprised of a set of helper functions at the moment, but is not a fully autonomous or functional tagging "driver" (though it could become later on). We do not have any users of NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q so now is a good time to make sure there are not issues being encountered by making this file strictly a place holder for helper functions. Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>