summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/ethtool/bitset.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-12-09ethtool: fix stack overflow in ethnl_parse_bitset()Michal Kubecek
Syzbot reported a stack overflow in bitmap_from_arr32() called from ethnl_parse_bitset() when bitset from netlink message is longer than target bitmap length. While ethnl_compact_sanity_checks() makes sure that trailing part is all zeros (i.e. the request does not try to touch bits kernel does not recognize), we also need to cap change_bits to nbits so that we don't try to write past the prepared bitmaps. Fixes: 88db6d1e4f62 ("ethtool: add ethnl_parse_bitset() helper") Reported-by: syzbot+9d39fa49d4df294aab93@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3487ee3a98e14cd526f55b6caaa959d2dcbcad9f.1607465316.git.mkubecek@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2020-10-06ethtool: trim policy tablesJakub Kicinski
Since ethtool uses strict attribute validation there's no need to initialize all attributes in policy tables. 0 is NLA_UNSPEC which is going to be rejected. Remove the NLA_REJECTs. Similarly attributes above maxattrs are rejected, so there's no need to always size the policy tables to ETHTOOL_A_..._MAX. v2: - new patch Suggested-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-03-12ethtool: add ethnl_parse_bitset() helperMichal Kubecek
Unlike other SET type commands, modifying netdev features is required to provide a reply telling userspace what was actually changed, compared to what was requested. For that purpose, the "modified" flag provided by ethnl_update_bitset() is not sufficient, we need full information which bits were requested to change. Therefore provide ethnl_parse_bitset() returning effective value and mask bitmaps equivalent to the contents of a bitset nested attribute. v2: use non-atomic __set_bit() (suggested by David Miller) Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-02-26ethtool: limit bitset sizeMichal Kubecek
Syzbot reported that ethnl_compact_sanity_checks() can be tricked into reading past the end of ETHTOOL_A_BITSET_VALUE and ETHTOOL_A_BITSET_MASK attributes and even the message by passing a value between (u32)(-31) and (u32)(-1) as ETHTOOL_A_BITSET_SIZE. The problem is that DIV_ROUND_UP(attr_nbits, 32) is 0 for such values so that zero length ETHTOOL_A_BITSET_VALUE will pass the length check but ethnl_bitmap32_not_zero() check would try to access up to 512 MB of attribute "payload". Prevent this overflow byt limiting the bitset size. Technically, compact bitset format would allow bitset sizes up to almost 2^18 (so that the nest size does not exceed U16_MAX) but bitsets used by ethtool are much shorter. S16_MAX, the largest value which can be directly used as an upper limit in policy, should be a reasonable compromise. Fixes: 10b518d4e6dd ("ethtool: netlink bitset handling") Reported-by: syzbot+7fd4ed5b4234ab1fdccd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+709b7a64d57978247e44@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+983cb8fb2d17a7af549d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-02-16ethtool: fix application of verbose no_mask bitsetMichal Kubecek
A bitset without mask in a _SET request means we want exactly the bits in the bitset to be set. This works correctly for compact format but when verbose format is parsed, ethnl_update_bitset32_verbose() only sets the bits present in the request bitset but does not clear the rest. This can cause incorrect results like lion:~ # ethtool eth0 | grep Wake Supports Wake-on: pumbg Wake-on: g lion:~ # ethtool -s eth0 wol u lion:~ # ethtool eth0 | grep Wake Supports Wake-on: pumbg Wake-on: ug when the second ethtool command issues request ETHTOOL_MSG_WOL_SET ETHTOOL_A_WOL_HEADER ETHTOOL_A_HEADER_DEV_NAME = "eth0" ETHTOOL_A_WOL_MODES ETHTOOL_A_BITSET_NOMASK ETHTOOL_A_BITSET_BITS ETHTOOL_A_BITSET_BITS_BIT ETHTOOL_BITSET_BIT_INDEX = 1 Fix the logic by clearing the whole target bitmap before we start iterating through the request bits. Fixes: 10b518d4e6dd ("ethtool: netlink bitset handling") Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-12-27ethtool: netlink bitset handlingMichal Kubecek
The ethtool netlink code uses common framework for passing arbitrary length bit sets to allow future extensions. A bitset can be a list (only one bitmap) or can consist of value and mask pair (used e.g. when client want to modify only some bits). A bitset can use one of two formats: verbose (bit by bit) or compact. Verbose format consists of bitset size (number of bits), list flag and an array of bit nests, telling which bits are part of the list or which bits are in the mask and which of them are to be set. In requests, bits can be identified by index (position) or by name. In replies, kernel provides both index and name. Verbose format is suitable for "one shot" applications like standard ethtool command as it avoids the need to either keep bit names (e.g. link modes) in sync with kernel or having to add an extra roundtrip for string set request (e.g. for private flags). Compact format uses one (list) or two (value/mask) arrays of 32-bit words to store the bitmap(s). It is more suitable for long running applications (ethtool in monitor mode or network management daemons) which can retrieve the names once and then pass only compact bitmaps to save space. Userspace requests can use either format; ETHTOOL_FLAG_COMPACT_BITSETS flag in request header tells kernel which format to use in reply. Notifications always use compact format. As some code uses arrays of unsigned long for internal representation and some arrays of u32 (or even a single u32), two sets of parse/compose helpers are introduced. To avoid code duplication, helpers for unsigned long arrays are implemented as wrappers around helpers for u32 arrays. There are two reasons for this choice: (1) u32 arrays are more frequent in ethtool code and (2) unsigned long array can be always interpreted as an u32 array on little endian 64-bit and all 32-bit architectures while we would need special handling for odd number of u32 words in the opposite direction. Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>