summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2023-12-24rxrpc, afs: Allow afs to pin rxrpc_peer objectsDavid Howells
Change rxrpc's API such that: (1) A new function, rxrpc_kernel_lookup_peer(), is provided to look up an rxrpc_peer record for a remote address and a corresponding function, rxrpc_kernel_put_peer(), is provided to dispose of it again. (2) When setting up a call, the rxrpc_peer object used during a call is now passed in rather than being set up by rxrpc_connect_call(). For afs, this meenat passing it to rxrpc_kernel_begin_call() rather than the full address (the service ID then has to be passed in as a separate parameter). (3) A new function, rxrpc_kernel_remote_addr(), is added so that afs can get a pointer to the transport address for display purposed, and another, rxrpc_kernel_remote_srx(), to gain a pointer to the full rxrpc address. (4) The function to retrieve the RTT from a call, rxrpc_kernel_get_srtt(), is then altered to take a peer. This now returns the RTT or -1 if there are insufficient samples. (5) Rename rxrpc_kernel_get_peer() to rxrpc_kernel_call_get_peer(). (6) Provide a new function, rxrpc_kernel_get_peer(), to get a ref on a peer the caller already has. This allows the afs filesystem to pin the rxrpc_peer records that it is using, allowing faster lookups and pointer comparisons rather than comparing sockaddr_rxrpc contents. It also makes it easier to get hold of the RTT. The following changes are made to afs: (1) The addr_list struct's addrs[] elements now hold a peer struct pointer and a service ID rather than a sockaddr_rxrpc. (2) When displaying the transport address, rxrpc_kernel_remote_addr() is used. (3) The port arg is removed from afs_alloc_addrlist() since it's always overridden. (4) afs_merge_fs_addr4() and afs_merge_fs_addr6() do peer lookup and may now return an error that must be handled. (5) afs_find_server() now takes a peer pointer to specify the address. (6) afs_find_server(), afs_compare_fs_alists() and afs_merge_fs_addr[46]{} now do peer pointer comparison rather than address comparison. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2023-05-01rxrpc: Fix timeout of a call that hasn't yet been granted a channelDavid Howells
afs_make_call() calls rxrpc_kernel_begin_call() to begin a call (which may get stalled in the background waiting for a connection to become available); it then calls rxrpc_kernel_set_max_life() to set the timeouts - but that starts the call timer so the call timer might then expire before we get a connection assigned - leading to the following oops if the call stalled: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 ... CPU: 1 PID: 5111 Comm: krxrpcio/0 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc7-build3+ #701 RIP: 0010:rxrpc_alloc_txbuf+0xc0/0x157 ... Call Trace: <TASK> rxrpc_send_ACK+0x50/0x13b rxrpc_input_call_event+0x16a/0x67d rxrpc_io_thread+0x1b6/0x45f ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1f/0x35 ? rxrpc_input_packet+0x519/0x519 kthread+0xe7/0xef ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x1b/0x1b ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Fix this by noting the timeouts in struct rxrpc_call when the call is created. The timer will be started when the first packet is transmitted. It shouldn't be possible to trigger this directly from userspace through AF_RXRPC as sendmsg() will return EBUSY if the call is in the waiting-for-conn state if it dropped out of the wait due to a signal. Fixes: 9d35d880e0e4 ("rxrpc: Move client call connection to the I/O thread") Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2023-05-01rxrpc: Make it so that a waiting process can be abortedDavid Howells
When sendmsg() creates an rxrpc call, it queues it to wait for a connection and channel to be assigned and then waits before it can start shovelling data as the encrypted DATA packet content includes a summary of the connection parameters. However, sendmsg() may get interrupted before a connection gets assigned and further sendmsg() calls will fail with EBUSY until an assignment is made. Fix this so that the call can at least be aborted without failing on EBUSY. We have to be careful here as sendmsg() mustn't be allowed to start the call timer if the call doesn't yet have a connection assigned as an oops may follow shortly thereafter. Fixes: 540b1c48c37a ("rxrpc: Fix deadlock between call creation and sendmsg/recvmsg") Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2023-05-01rxrpc: Fix hard call timeout unitsDavid Howells
The hard call timeout is specified in the RXRPC_SET_CALL_TIMEOUT cmsg in seconds, so fix the point at which sendmsg() applies it to the call to convert to jiffies from seconds, not milliseconds. Fixes: a158bdd3247b ("rxrpc: Fix timeout of a call that hasn't yet been granted a channel") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2023-04-27rxrpc: Fix potential data race in rxrpc_wait_to_be_connected()David Howells
Inside the loop in rxrpc_wait_to_be_connected() it checks call->error to see if it should exit the loop without first checking the call state. This is probably safe as if call->error is set, the call is dead anyway, but we should probably wait for the call state to have been set to completion first, lest it cause surprise on the way out. Fix this by only accessing call->error if the call is complete. We don't actually need to access the error inside the loop as we'll do that after. This caused the following report: BUG: KCSAN: data-race in rxrpc_send_data / rxrpc_set_call_completion write to 0xffff888159cf3c50 of 4 bytes by task 25673 on cpu 1: rxrpc_set_call_completion+0x71/0x1c0 net/rxrpc/call_state.c:22 rxrpc_send_data_packet+0xba9/0x1650 net/rxrpc/output.c:479 rxrpc_transmit_one+0x1e/0x130 net/rxrpc/output.c:714 rxrpc_decant_prepared_tx net/rxrpc/call_event.c:326 [inline] rxrpc_transmit_some_data+0x496/0x600 net/rxrpc/call_event.c:350 rxrpc_input_call_event+0x564/0x1220 net/rxrpc/call_event.c:464 rxrpc_io_thread+0x307/0x1d80 net/rxrpc/io_thread.c:461 kthread+0x1ac/0x1e0 kernel/kthread.c:376 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308 read to 0xffff888159cf3c50 of 4 bytes by task 25672 on cpu 0: rxrpc_send_data+0x29e/0x1950 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:296 rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0xb7a/0xc20 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:726 rxrpc_sendmsg+0x413/0x520 net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c:565 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:724 [inline] sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:747 [inline] ____sys_sendmsg+0x375/0x4c0 net/socket.c:2501 ___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2555 [inline] __sys_sendmmsg+0x263/0x500 net/socket.c:2641 __do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2670 [inline] __se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2667 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmmsg+0x57/0x60 net/socket.c:2667 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd value changed: 0x00000000 -> 0xffffffea Fixes: 9d35d880e0e4 ("rxrpc: Move client call connection to the I/O thread") Reported-by: syzbot+ebc945fdb4acd72cba78@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/000000000000e7c6d205fa10a3cd@google.com/ Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/508133.1682427395@warthog.procyon.org.uk Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
2023-01-06rxrpc: Move client call connection to the I/O threadDavid Howells
Move the connection setup of client calls to the I/O thread so that a whole load of locking and barrierage can be eliminated. This necessitates the app thread waiting for connection to complete before it can begin encrypting data. This also completes the fix for a race that exists between call connection and call disconnection whereby the data transmission code adds the call to the peer error distribution list after the call has been disconnected (say by the rxrpc socket getting closed). The fix is to complete the process of moving call connection, data transmission and call disconnection into the I/O thread and thus forcibly serialising them. Note that the issue may predate the overhaul to an I/O thread model that were included in the merge window for v6.2, but the timing is very much changed by the change given below. Fixes: cf37b5987508 ("rxrpc: Move DATA transmission into call processor work item") Reported-by: syzbot+c22650d2844392afdcfd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2023-01-06rxrpc: Remove call->state_lockDavid Howells
All the setters of call->state are now in the I/O thread and thus the state lock is now unnecessary. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2023-01-06rxrpc: Move call state changes from sendmsg to I/O threadDavid Howells
Move all the call state changes that are made in rxrpc_sendmsg() to the I/O thread. This is a step towards removing the call state lock. This requires the switch to the RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_AWAIT_REPLY and RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_SEND_REPLY states to be done when the last packet is decanted from ->tx_sendmsg to ->tx_buffer in the I/O thread, not when it is added to ->tx_sendmsg by sendmsg(). Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2023-01-06rxrpc: Wrap accesses to get call state to put the barrier in one placeDavid Howells
Wrap accesses to get the state of a call from outside of the I/O thread in a single place so that the barrier needed to order wrt the error code and abort code is in just that place. Also use a barrier when setting the call state and again when reading the call state such that the auxiliary completion info (error code, abort code) can be read without taking a read lock on the call state lock. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2023-01-06rxrpc: Set up a connection bundle from a call, not rxrpc_conn_parametersDavid Howells
Use the information now stored in struct rxrpc_call to configure the connection bundle and thence the connection, rather than using the rxrpc_conn_parameters struct. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2023-01-06rxrpc: Tidy up abort generation infrastructureDavid Howells
Tidy up the abort generation infrastructure in the following ways: (1) Create an enum and string mapping table to list the reasons an abort might be generated in tracing. (2) Replace the 3-char string with the values from (1) in the places that use that to log the abort source. This gets rid of a memcpy() in the tracepoint. (3) Subsume the rxrpc_rx_eproto tracepoint with the rxrpc_abort tracepoint and use values from (1) to indicate the trace reason. (4) Always make a call to an abort function at the point of the abort rather than stashing the values into variables and using goto to get to a place where it reported. The C optimiser will collapse the calls together as appropriate. The abort functions return a value that can be returned directly if appropriate. Note that this extends into afs also at the points where that generates an abort. To aid with this, the afs sources need to #define RXRPC_TRACE_ONLY_DEFINE_ENUMS before including the rxrpc tracing header because they don't have access to the rxrpc internal structures that some of the tracepoints make use of. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2023-01-06rxrpc: Only set/transmit aborts in the I/O threadDavid Howells
Only set the abort call completion state in the I/O thread and only transmit ABORT packets from there. rxrpc_abort_call() can then be made to actually send the packet. Further, ABORT packets should only be sent if the call has been exposed to the network (ie. at least one attempted DATA transmission has occurred for it). Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-12-19rxrpc: Fix missing unlock in rxrpc_do_sendmsg()David Howells
One of the error paths in rxrpc_do_sendmsg() doesn't unlock the call mutex before returning. Fix it to do this. Note that this still doesn't get rid of the checker warning: ../net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:617:5: warning: context imbalance in 'rxrpc_do_sendmsg' - wrong count at exit I think the interplay between the socket lock and the call's user_mutex may be too complicated for checker to analyse, especially as rxrpc_new_client_call_for_sendmsg(), which it calls, returns with the call's user_mutex if successful but unconditionally drops the socket lock. Fixes: e754eba685aa ("rxrpc: Provide a cmsg to specify the amount of Tx data for a call") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-12-01rxrpc: Transmit ACKs at the point of generationDavid Howells
For ACKs generated inside the I/O thread, transmit the ACK at the point of generation. Where the ACK is generated outside of the I/O thread, it's offloaded to the I/O thread to transmit it. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-12-01rxrpc: Remove the _bh annotation from all the spinlocksDavid Howells
None of the spinlocks in rxrpc need a _bh annotation now as the RCU callback routines no longer take spinlocks and the bulk of the packet wrangling code is now run in the I/O thread, not softirq context. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-12-01rxrpc: Make the I/O thread take over the call and local processor workDavid Howells
Move the functions from the call->processor and local->processor work items into the domain of the I/O thread. The call event processor, now called from the I/O thread, then takes over the job of cranking the call state machine, processing incoming packets and transmitting DATA, ACK and ABORT packets. In a future patch, rxrpc_send_ACK() will transmit the ACK on the spot rather than queuing it for later transmission. The call event processor becomes purely received-skb driven. It only transmits things in response to events. We use "pokes" to queue a dummy skb to make it do things like start/resume transmitting data. Timer expiry also results in pokes. The connection event processor, becomes similar, though crypto events, such as dealing with CHALLENGE and RESPONSE packets is offloaded to a work item to avoid doing crypto in the I/O thread. The local event processor is removed and VERSION response packets are generated directly from the packet parser. Similarly, ABORTs generated in response to protocol errors will be transmitted immediately rather than being pushed onto a queue for later transmission. Changes: ======== ver #2) - Fix a couple of introduced lock context imbalances. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-12-01rxrpc: Move DATA transmission into call processor work itemDavid Howells
Move DATA transmission into the call processor work item. In a future patch, this will be called from the I/O thread rather than being itsown work item. This will allow DATA transmission to be driven directly by incoming ACKs, pokes and timers as those are processed. The Tx queue is also split: The queue of packets prepared by sendmsg is now places in call->tx_sendmsg and the packet dispatcher decants the packets into call->tx_buffer as space becomes available in the transmission window. This allows sendmsg to run ahead of the available space to try and prevent an underflow in transmission. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-12-01rxrpc: trace: Don't use __builtin_return_address for rxrpc_call tracingDavid Howells
In rxrpc tracing, use enums to generate lists of points of interest rather than __builtin_return_address() for the rxrpc_call tracepoint Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-12-01rxrpc: trace: Don't use __builtin_return_address for rxrpc_peer tracingDavid Howells
In rxrpc tracing, use enums to generate lists of points of interest rather than __builtin_return_address() for the rxrpc_peer tracepoint Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-11-08rxrpc: Fix congestion managementDavid Howells
rxrpc has a problem in its congestion management in that it saves the congestion window size (cwnd) from one call to another, but if this is 0 at the time is saved, then the next call may not actually manage to ever transmit anything. To this end: (1) Don't save cwnd between calls, but rather reset back down to the initial cwnd and re-enter slow-start if data transmission is idle for more than an RTT. (2) Preserve ssthresh instead, as that is a handy estimate of pipe capacity. Knowing roughly when to stop slow start and enter congestion avoidance can reduce the tendency to overshoot and drop larger amounts of packets when probing. In future, cwind growth also needs to be constrained when the window isn't being filled due to being application limited. Reported-by: Simon Wilkinson <sxw@auristor.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-11-08rxrpc: Save last ACK's SACK table rather than marking txbufsDavid Howells
Improve the tracking of which packets need to be transmitted by saving the last ACK packet that we receive that has a populated soft-ACK table rather than marking packets. Then we can step through the soft-ACK table and look at the packets we've transmitted beyond that to determine which packets we might want to retransmit. We also look at the highest serial number that has been acked to try and guess which packets we've transmitted the peer is likely to have seen. If necessary, we send a ping to retrieve that number. One downside that might be a problem is that we can't then compare the previous acked/unacked state so easily in rxrpc_input_soft_acks() - which is a potential problem for the slow-start algorithm. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-11-08rxrpc: Don't use a ring buffer for call Tx queueDavid Howells
Change the way the Tx queueing works to make the following ends easier to achieve: (1) The filling of packets, the encryption of packets and the transmission of packets can be handled in parallel by separate threads, rather than rxrpc_sendmsg() allocating, filling, encrypting and transmitting each packet before moving onto the next one. (2) Get rid of the fixed-size ring which sets a hard limit on the number of packets that can be retained in the ring. This allows the number of packets to increase without having to allocate a very large ring or having variable-sized rings. [Note: the downside of this is that it's then less efficient to locate a packet for retransmission as we then have to step through a list and examine each buffer in the list.] (3) Allow the filler/encrypter to run ahead of the transmission window. (4) Make it easier to do zero copy UDP from the packet buffers. (5) Make it easier to do zero copy from userspace to the packet buffers - and thence to UDP (only if for unauthenticated connections). To that end, the following changes are made: (1) Use the new rxrpc_txbuf struct instead of sk_buff for keeping packets to be transmitted in. This allows them to be placed on multiple queues simultaneously. An sk_buff isn't really necessary as it's never passed on to lower-level networking code. (2) Keep the transmissable packets in a linked list on the call struct rather than in a ring. As a consequence, the annotation buffer isn't used either; rather a flag is set on the packet to indicate ackedness. (3) Use the RXRPC_CALL_TX_LAST flag to indicate that the last packet to be transmitted has been queued. Add RXRPC_CALL_TX_ALL_ACKED to indicate that all packets up to and including the last got hard acked. (4) Wire headers are now stored in the txbuf rather than being concocted on the stack and they're stored immediately before the data, thereby allowing zerocopy of a single span. (5) Don't bother with instant-resend on transmission failure; rather, leave it for a timer or an ACK packet to trigger. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-11-08rxrpc: Clean up ACK handlingDavid Howells
Clean up the rxrpc_propose_ACK() function. If deferred PING ACK proposal is split out, it's only really needed for deferred DELAY ACKs. All other ACKs, bar terminal IDLE ACK are sent immediately. The deferred IDLE ACK submission can be handled by conversion of a DELAY ACK into an IDLE ACK if there's nothing to be SACK'd. Also, because there's a delay between an ACK being generated and being transmitted, it's possible that other ACKs of the same type will be generated during that interval. Apart from the ACK time and the serial number responded to, most of the ACK body, including window and SACK parameters, are not filled out till the point of transmission - so we can avoid generating a new ACK if there's one pending that will cover the SACK data we need to convey. Therefore, don't propose a new DELAY or IDLE ACK for a call if there's one already pending. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-11-08rxrpc: Allocate ACK records at proposal and queue for transmissionDavid Howells
Allocate rxrpc_txbuf records for ACKs and put onto a queue for the transmitter thread to dispatch. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-11-08rxrpc: Remove the flags from the rxrpc_skb tracepointDavid Howells
Remove the flags from the rxrpc_skb tracepoint as we're no longer going to be using this for the transmission buffers and so marking which are transmission buffers isn't going to be necessary. Note that this also remove the rxrpc skb flag that indicates if this is a transmission buffer and so the count is not updated for the moment. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-11-08rxrpc: Add stats procfile and DATA packet statsDavid Howells
Add a procfile, /proc/net/rxrpc/stats, to display some statistics about what rxrpc has been doing. Writing a blank line to the stats file will clear the increment-only counters. Allocated resource counters don't get cleared. Add some counters to count various things about DATA packets, including the number created, transmitted and retransmitted and the number received, the number of ACK-requests markings and the number of jumbo packets received. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-08-25rxrpc: Fix locking in rxrpc's sendmsgDavid Howells
Fix three bugs in the rxrpc's sendmsg implementation: (1) rxrpc_new_client_call() should release the socket lock when returning an error from rxrpc_get_call_slot(). (2) rxrpc_wait_for_tx_window_intr() will return without the call mutex held in the event that we're interrupted by a signal whilst waiting for tx space on the socket or relocking the call mutex afterwards. Fix this by: (a) moving the unlock/lock of the call mutex up to rxrpc_send_data() such that the lock is not held around all of rxrpc_wait_for_tx_window*() and (b) indicating to higher callers whether we're return with the lock dropped. Note that this means recvmsg() will not block on this call whilst we're waiting. (3) After dropping and regaining the call mutex, rxrpc_send_data() needs to go and recheck the state of the tx_pending buffer and the tx_total_len check in case we raced with another sendmsg() on the same call. Thinking on this some more, it might make sense to have different locks for sendmsg() and recvmsg(). There's probably no need to make recvmsg() wait for sendmsg(). It does mean that recvmsg() can return MSG_EOR indicating that a call is dead before a sendmsg() to that call returns - but that can currently happen anyway. Without fix (2), something like the following can be induced: WARNING: bad unlock balance detected! 5.16.0-rc6-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------- syz-executor011/3597 is trying to release lock (&call->user_mutex) at: [<ffffffff885163a3>] rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0xc13/0x1350 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:748 but there are no more locks to release! other info that might help us debug this: no locks held by syz-executor011/3597. ... Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_unlock_imbalance_bug include/trace/events/lock.h:58 [inline] __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5306 [inline] lock_release.cold+0x49/0x4e kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5657 __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x99/0x5e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:900 rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0xc13/0x1350 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:748 rxrpc_sendmsg+0x420/0x630 net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c:561 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:724 ____sys_sendmsg+0x6e8/0x810 net/socket.c:2409 ___sys_sendmsg+0xf3/0x170 net/socket.c:2463 __sys_sendmsg+0xe5/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2492 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [Thanks to Hawkins Jiawei and Khalid Masum for their attempts to fix this] Fixes: bc5e3a546d55 ("rxrpc: Use MSG_WAITALL to tell sendmsg() to temporarily ignore signals") Reported-by: syzbot+7f0483225d0c94cb3441@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Tested-by: syzbot+7f0483225d0c94cb3441@syzkaller.appspotmail.com cc: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@gmail.com> cc: Khalid Masum <khalid.masum.92@gmail.com> cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166135894583.600315.7170979436768124075.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-05-22rxrpc: Return an error to sendmsg if call failedDavid Howells
If at the end of rxrpc sendmsg() or rxrpc_kernel_send_data() the call that was being given data was aborted remotely or otherwise failed, return an error rather than returning the amount of data buffered for transmission. The call (presumably) did not complete, so there's not much point continuing with it. AF_RXRPC considers it "complete" and so will be unwilling to do anything else with it - and won't send a notification for it, deeming the return from sendmsg sufficient. Not returning an error causes afs to incorrectly handle a StoreData operation that gets interrupted by a change of address due to NAT reconfiguration. This doesn't normally affect most operations since their request parameters tend to fit into a single UDP packet and afs_make_call() returns before the server responds; StoreData is different as it involves transmission of a lot of data. This can be triggered on a client by doing something like: dd if=/dev/zero of=/afs/example.com/foo bs=1M count=512 at one prompt, and then changing the network address at another prompt, e.g.: ifconfig enp6s0 inet 192.168.6.2 && route add 192.168.6.1 dev enp6s0 Tracing packets on an Auristor fileserver looks something like: 192.168.6.1 -> 192.168.6.3 RX 107 ACK Idle Seq: 0 Call: 4 Source Port: 7000 Destination Port: 7001 192.168.6.3 -> 192.168.6.1 AFS (RX) 1482 FS Request: Unknown(64538) (64538) 192.168.6.3 -> 192.168.6.1 AFS (RX) 1482 FS Request: Unknown(64538) (64538) 192.168.6.1 -> 192.168.6.3 RX 107 ACK Idle Seq: 0 Call: 4 Source Port: 7000 Destination Port: 7001 <ARP exchange for 192.168.6.2> 192.168.6.2 -> 192.168.6.1 AFS (RX) 1482 FS Request: Unknown(0) (0) 192.168.6.2 -> 192.168.6.1 AFS (RX) 1482 FS Request: Unknown(0) (0) 192.168.6.1 -> 192.168.6.2 RX 107 ACK Exceeds Window Seq: 0 Call: 4 Source Port: 7000 Destination Port: 7001 192.168.6.1 -> 192.168.6.2 RX 74 ABORT Seq: 0 Call: 4 Source Port: 7000 Destination Port: 7001 192.168.6.1 -> 192.168.6.2 RX 74 ABORT Seq: 29321 Call: 4 Source Port: 7000 Destination Port: 7001 The Auristor fileserver logs code -453 (RXGEN_SS_UNMARSHAL), but the abort code received by kafs is -5 (RX_PROTOCOL_ERROR) as the rx layer sees the condition and generates an abort first and the unmarshal error is a consequence of that at the application layer. Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2021-December/004810.html # v1 Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-11-23rxrpc: Ask the security class how much space to allow in a packetDavid Howells
Ask the security class how much header and trailer space to allow for when allocating a packet, given how much data is remaining. This will allow the rxgk security class to stick both a trailer in as well as a header as appropriate in the future. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-11-23rxrpc: Don't reserve security header in Tx DATA skbuffDavid Howells
Insert the security header into the skbuff representing a DATA packet to be transmitted rather than using skb_reserve() when the packet is allocated. This makes it easier to apply crypto that spans the security header and the data, particularly in the upcoming RxGK class where we have a common encrypt-and-checksum function that is used in a number of circumstances. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-10-05rxrpc: Fix accept on a connection that need securingDavid Howells
When a new incoming call arrives at an userspace rxrpc socket on a new connection that has a security class set, the code currently pushes it onto the accept queue to hold a ref on it for the socket. This doesn't work, however, as recvmsg() pops it off, notices that it's in the SERVER_SECURING state and discards the ref. This means that the call runs out of refs too early and the kernel oopses. By contrast, a kernel rxrpc socket manually pre-charges the incoming call pool with calls that already have user call IDs assigned, so they are ref'd by the call tree on the socket. Change the mode of operation for userspace rxrpc server sockets to work like this too. Although this is a UAPI change, server sockets aren't currently functional. Fixes: 248f219cb8bc ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-08-23treewide: Use fallthrough pseudo-keywordGustavo A. R. Silva
Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1]. Also, remove unnecessary fall-through markings when it is the case. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.7/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-07-30rxrpc: Fix race between recvmsg and sendmsg on immediate call failureDavid Howells
There's a race between rxrpc_sendmsg setting up a call, but then failing to send anything on it due to an error, and recvmsg() seeing the call completion occur and trying to return the state to the user. An assertion fails in rxrpc_recvmsg() because the call has already been released from the socket and is about to be released again as recvmsg deals with it. (The recvmsg_q queue on the socket holds a ref, so there's no problem with use-after-free.) We also have to be careful not to end up reporting an error twice, in such a way that both returns indicate to userspace that the user ID supplied with the call is no longer in use - which could cause the client to malfunction if it recycles the user ID fast enough. Fix this by the following means: (1) When sendmsg() creates a call after the point that the call has been successfully added to the socket, don't return any errors through sendmsg(), but rather complete the call and let recvmsg() retrieve them. Make sendmsg() return 0 at this point. Further calls to sendmsg() for that call will fail with ESHUTDOWN. Note that at this point, we haven't send any packets yet, so the server doesn't yet know about the call. (2) If sendmsg() returns an error when it was expected to create a new call, it means that the user ID wasn't used. (3) Mark the call disconnected before marking it completed to prevent an oops in rxrpc_release_call(). (4) recvmsg() will then retrieve the error and set MSG_EOR to indicate that the user ID is no longer known by the kernel. An oops like the following is produced: kernel BUG at net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c:605! ... RIP: 0010:rxrpc_recvmsg+0x256/0x5ae ... Call Trace: ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x2f/0x2f ____sys_recvmsg+0x8a/0x148 ? import_iovec+0x69/0x9c ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x5c/0x86 ___sys_recvmsg+0x72/0xaa ? __fget_files+0x22/0x57 ? __fget_light+0x46/0x51 ? fdget+0x9/0x1b do_recvmmsg+0x15e/0x232 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0xa/0xb ? vtime_delta+0xf/0x25 __x64_sys_recvmmsg+0x2c/0x2f do_syscall_64+0x4c/0x78 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Fixes: 357f5ef64628 ("rxrpc: Call rxrpc_release_call() on error in rxrpc_new_client_call()") Reported-by: syzbot+b54969381df354936d96@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-07-20rxrpc: Fix sendmsg() returning EPIPE due to recvmsg() returning ENODATADavid Howells
rxrpc_sendmsg() returns EPIPE if there's an outstanding error, such as if rxrpc_recvmsg() indicating ENODATA if there's nothing for it to read. Change rxrpc_recvmsg() to return EAGAIN instead if there's nothing to read as this particular error doesn't get stored in ->sk_err by the networking core. Also change rxrpc_sendmsg() so that it doesn't fail with delayed receive errors (there's no way for it to report which call, if any, the error was caused by). Fixes: 17926a79320a ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-06-05rxrpc: Fix missing notificationDavid Howells
Under some circumstances, rxrpc will fail a transmit a packet through the underlying UDP socket (ie. UDP sendmsg returns an error). This may result in a call getting stuck. In the instance being seen, where AFS tries to send a probe to the Volume Location server, tracepoints show the UDP Tx failure (in this case returing error 99 EADDRNOTAVAIL) and then nothing more: afs_make_vl_call: c=0000015d VL.GetCapabilities rxrpc_call: c=0000015d NWc u=1 sp=rxrpc_kernel_begin_call+0x106/0x170 [rxrpc] a=00000000dd89ee8a rxrpc_call: c=0000015d Gus u=2 sp=rxrpc_new_client_call+0x14f/0x580 [rxrpc] a=00000000e20e4b08 rxrpc_call: c=0000015d SEE u=2 sp=rxrpc_activate_one_channel+0x7b/0x1c0 [rxrpc] a=00000000e20e4b08 rxrpc_call: c=0000015d CON u=2 sp=rxrpc_kernel_begin_call+0x106/0x170 [rxrpc] a=00000000e20e4b08 rxrpc_tx_fail: c=0000015d r=1 ret=-99 CallDataNofrag The problem is that if the initial packet fails and the retransmission timer hasn't been started, the call is set to completed and an error is returned from rxrpc_send_data_packet() to rxrpc_queue_packet(). Though rxrpc_instant_resend() is called, this does nothing because the call is marked completed. So rxrpc_notify_socket() isn't called and the error is passed back up to rxrpc_send_data(), rxrpc_kernel_send_data() and thence to afs_make_call() and afs_vl_get_capabilities() where it is simply ignored because it is assumed that the result of a probe will be collected asynchronously. Fileserver probing is similarly affected via afs_fs_get_capabilities(). Fix this by always issuing a notification in __rxrpc_set_call_completion() if it shifts a call to the completed state, even if an error is also returned to the caller through the function return value. Also put in a little bit of optimisation to avoid taking the call state_lock and disabling softirqs if the call is already in the completed state and remove some now redundant rxrpc_notify_socket() calls. Fixes: f5c17aaeb2ae ("rxrpc: Calls should only have one terminal state") Reported-by: Gerry Seidman <gerry@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
2020-06-05rxrpc: Move the call completion handling out of lineDavid Howells
Move the handling of call completion out of line so that the next patch can add more code in that area. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
2020-05-11rxrpc: Fix the excessive initial retransmission timeoutDavid Howells
rxrpc currently uses a fixed 4s retransmission timeout until the RTT is sufficiently sampled. This can cause problems with some fileservers with calls to the cache manager in the afs filesystem being dropped from the fileserver because a packet goes missing and the retransmission timeout is greater than the call expiry timeout. Fix this by: (1) Copying the RTT/RTO calculation code from Linux's TCP implementation and altering it to fit rxrpc. (2) Altering the various users of the RTT to make use of the new SRTT value. (3) Replacing the use of rxrpc_resend_timeout to use the calculated RTO value instead (which is needed in jiffies), along with a backoff. Notes: (1) rxrpc provides RTT samples by matching the serial numbers on outgoing DATA packets that have the RXRPC_REQUEST_ACK set and PING ACK packets against the reference serial number in incoming REQUESTED ACK and PING-RESPONSE ACK packets. (2) Each packet that is transmitted on an rxrpc connection gets a new per-connection serial number, even for retransmissions, so an ACK can be cross-referenced to a specific trigger packet. This allows RTT information to be drawn from retransmitted DATA packets also. (3) rxrpc maintains the RTT/RTO state on the rxrpc_peer record rather than on an rxrpc_call because many RPC calls won't live long enough to generate more than one sample. (4) The calculated SRTT value is in units of 8ths of a microsecond rather than nanoseconds. The (S)RTT and RTO values are displayed in /proc/net/rxrpc/peers. Fixes: 17926a79320a ([AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both"") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-03-13rxrpc: Fix sendmsg(MSG_WAITALL) handlingDavid Howells
Fix the handling of sendmsg() with MSG_WAITALL for userspace to round the timeout for when a signal occurs up to at least two jiffies as a 1 jiffy timeout may end up being effectively 0 if jiffies wraps at the wrong time. Fixes: bc5e3a546d55 ("rxrpc: Use MSG_WAITALL to tell sendmsg() to temporarily ignore signals") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-03-13rxrpc: Fix call interruptibility handlingDavid Howells
Fix the interruptibility of kernel-initiated client calls so that they're either only interruptible when they're waiting for a call slot to come available or they're not interruptible at all. Either way, they're not interruptible during transmission. This should help prevent StoreData calls from being interrupted when writeback is in progress. It doesn't, however, handle interruption during the receive phase. Userspace-initiated calls are still interruptable. After the signal has been handled, sendmsg() will return the amount of data copied out of the buffer and userspace can perform another sendmsg() call to continue transmission. Fixes: bc5e3a546d55 ("rxrpc: Use MSG_WAITALL to tell sendmsg() to temporarily ignore signals") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-03-13rxrpc: Abstract out the calculation of whether there's Tx spaceDavid Howells
Abstract out the calculation of there being sufficient Tx buffer space. This is reproduced several times in the rxrpc sendmsg code. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2019-10-07rxrpc: Fix call crypto state cleanupDavid Howells
Fix the cleanup of the crypto state on a call after the call has been disconnected. As the call has been disconnected, its connection ref has been discarded and so we can't go through that to get to the security ops table. Fix this by caching the security ops pointer in the rxrpc_call struct and using that when freeing the call security state. Also use this in other places we're dealing with call-specific security. The symptoms look like: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rxrpc_release_call+0xb2d/0xb60 net/rxrpc/call_object.c:481 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888062ffeb50 by task syz-executor.5/4764 Fixes: 1db88c534371 ("rxrpc: Fix -Wframe-larger-than= warnings from on-stack crypto") Reported-by: syzbot+eed305768ece6682bb7f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2019-10-07rxrpc: Fix call ref leakDavid Howells
When sendmsg() finds a call to continue on with, if the call is in an inappropriate state, it doesn't release the ref it just got on that call before returning an error. This causes the following symptom to show up with kasan: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rxrpc_send_keepalive+0x8a2/0x940 net/rxrpc/output.c:635 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888064219698 by task kworker/0:3/11077 where line 635 is: whdr.epoch = htonl(peer->local->rxnet->epoch); The local endpoint (which cannot be pinned by the call) has been released, but not the peer (which is pinned by the call). Fix this by releasing the call in the error path. Fixes: 37411cad633f ("rxrpc: Fix potential NULL-pointer exception") Reported-by: syzbot+d850c266e3df14da1d31@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2019-08-27rxrpc: Use the tx-phase skb flag to simplify tracingDavid Howells
Use the previously-added transmit-phase skbuff private flag to simplify the socket buffer tracing a bit. Which phase the skbuff comes from can now be divined from the skb rather than having to be guessed from the call state. We can also reduce the number of rxrpc_skb_trace values by eliminating the difference between Tx and Rx in the symbols. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2019-08-27rxrpc: Add a private skb flag to indicate transmission-phase skbsDavid Howells
Add a flag in the private data on an skbuff to indicate that this is a transmission-phase buffer rather than a receive-phase buffer. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2019-07-30rxrpc: Fix the lack of notification when sendmsg() fails on a DATA packetDavid Howells
Fix the fact that a notification isn't sent to the recvmsg side to indicate a call failed when sendmsg() fails to transmit a DATA packet with the error ENETUNREACH, EHOSTUNREACH or ECONNREFUSED. Without this notification, the afs client just sits there waiting for the call to complete in some manner (which it's not now going to do), which also pins the rxrpc call in place. This can be seen if the client has a scope-level IPv6 address, but not a global-level IPv6 address, and we try and transmit an operation to a server's IPv6 address. Looking in /proc/net/rxrpc/calls shows completed calls just sat there with an abort code of RX_USER_ABORT and an error code of -ENETUNREACH. Fixes: c54e43d752c7 ("rxrpc: Fix missing start of call timeout") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>
2019-05-24treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 36Thomas Gleixner
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public licence as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the licence or at your option any later version extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 114 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520170857.552531963@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-16rxrpc: Allow the kernel to mark a call as being non-interruptibleDavid Howells
Allow kernel services using AF_RXRPC to indicate that a call should be non-interruptible. This allows kafs to make things like lock-extension and writeback data storage calls non-interruptible. If this is set, signals will be ignored for operations on that call where possible - such as waiting to get a call channel on an rxrpc connection. It doesn't prevent UDP sendmsg from being interrupted, but that will be handled by packet retransmission. rxrpc_kernel_recv_data() isn't affected by this since that never waits, preferring instead to return -EAGAIN and leave the waiting to the caller. Userspace initiated calls can't be set to be uninterruptible at this time. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2019-04-12rxrpc: Allow errors to be returned from rxrpc_queue_packet()Marc Dionne
Change rxrpc_queue_packet()'s signature so that it can return any error code it may encounter when trying to send the packet. This allows the caller to eventually do something in case of error - though it should be noted that the packet has been queued and a resend is scheduled. Signed-off-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-01-15Revert "rxrpc: Allow failed client calls to be retried"David Howells
The changes introduced to allow rxrpc calls to be retried creates an issue when it comes to refcounting afs_call structs. The problem is that when rxrpc_send_data() queues the last packet for an asynchronous call, the following sequence can occur: (1) The notify_end_tx callback is invoked which causes the state in the afs_call to be changed from AFS_CALL_CL_REQUESTING or AFS_CALL_SV_REPLYING. (2) afs_deliver_to_call() can then process event notifications from rxrpc on the async_work queue. (3) Delivery of events, such as an abort from the server, can cause the afs_call state to be changed to AFS_CALL_COMPLETE on async_work. (4) For an asynchronous call, afs_process_async_call() notes that the call is complete and tried to clean up all the refs on async_work. (5) rxrpc_send_data() might return the amount of data transferred (success) or an error - which could in turn reflect a local error or a received error. Synchronising the clean up after rxrpc_kernel_send_data() returns an error with the asynchronous cleanup is then tricky to get right. Mostly revert commit c038a58ccfd6704d4d7d60ed3d6a0fca13cf13a4. The two API functions the original commit added aren't currently used. This makes rxrpc_kernel_send_data() always return successfully if it queued the data it was given. Note that this doesn't affect synchronous calls since their Rx notification function merely pokes a wait queue and does not refcounting. The asynchronous call notification function *has* to do refcounting and pass a ref over the work item to avoid the need to sync the workqueue in call cleanup. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-05-10rxrpc: Fix missing start of call timeoutDavid Howells
The expect_rx_by call timeout is supposed to be set when a call is started to indicate that we need to receive a packet by that point. This is currently put back every time we receive a packet, but it isn't started when we first send a packet. Without this, the call may wait forever if the server doesn't deign to reply. Fix this by setting the timeout upon a successful UDP sendmsg call for the first DATA packet. The timeout is initiated only for initial transmission and not for subsequent retries as we don't want the retry mechanism to extend the timeout indefinitely. Fixes: a158bdd3247b ("rxrpc: Fix call timeouts") Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>