linux-arm.git - Russell King's ARM Linux kernel tree

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2020-01-02	samples/seccomp: Zero out members based on seccomp_notif_sizes	Sargun Dhillon
	The sizes by which seccomp_notif and seccomp_notif_resp are allocated are based on the SECCOMP_GET_NOTIF_SIZES ioctl. This allows for graceful extension of these datastructures. If userspace zeroes out the datastructure based on its version, and it is lagging behind the kernel's version, it will end up sending trailing garbage. On the other hand, if it is ahead of the kernel version, it will write extra zero space, and potentially cause corruption. Signed-off-by: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me> Suggested-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191230203503.4925-1-sargun@sargun.me Fixes: fec7b6690541 ("samples: add an example of seccomp user trap") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2018-12-11	samples: add an example of seccomp user trap	Tycho Andersen
	The idea here is just to give a demonstration of how one could safely use the SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF feature to do mount policies. This particular policy is (as noted in the comment) not very interesting, but it serves to illustrate how one might apply a policy dodging the various TOCTOU issues. Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws> CC: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> CC: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> CC: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> CC: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io> CC: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com> CC: Akihiro Suda <suda.akihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>