summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2014-07-18perf tools: Enable close-on-exec flag on perf file descriptorYann Droneaud
In commit a21b0b354d4a ('perf: Introduce a flag to enable close-on-exec in perf_event_open()'), flag PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC was added to perf_event_open(2) syscall to allows userspace to atomically enable close-on-exec behavor when creating the file descriptor. This patch makes perf tools use the new flag if supported by the kernel, so that the event file descriptors got automatically closed if perf tool exec a sub-command. Signed-off-by: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/1404160127-7475-1-git-send-email-ydroneaud@opteya.com Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
2013-05-28perf tests: Fix compile errors in bp_signal filesSukadev Bhattiprolu
When building on powerpc, we get compile errors in bp_signal.c and bp_signal_overflow.c due to __u64 and '%llx'. Powerpc, needs __SANE_USERSPACE_TYPES__ to be defined so we pick up <asm-generic/int-ll64.h> and define __u64 as unsigned long long. Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130426173320.GA7029@us.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2013-03-15perf tests: Test breakpoint overflow signal handlerJiri Olsa
Adding automated test for breakpoint event signal handler checking if it's executed properly. The test is related to the proper handling of the RF EFLAGS bit on x86_64, but it's generic for all archs. First we check the signal handler is properly called and that the following debug exception return to user space wouldn't trigger recursive breakpoint. This is related to x86_64 RF EFLAGS bit being managed in a wrong way. Second we check that we can set breakpoint in signal handler, which is not possible on x86_64 if the signal handler is executed with RF EFLAG set. This test is inpired by overflow tests done by Vince Weaver. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1362940871-24486-6-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com [ committer note: s/pr_err/pr_debug/g i.e. print just OK or FAILED in non verbose mode ] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>