| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace
Pull probes updates from Masami Hiramatsu:
"Uprobes:
- x86/shstk: Make return uprobe work with shadow stack
- Add uretprobe syscall which speeds up the uretprobe 10-30% faster.
This syscall is automatically used from user-space trampolines
which are generated by the uretprobe. If this syscall is used by
normal user program, it will cause SIGILL. Note that this is
currently only implemented on x86_64.
(This also has two fixes for adjusting the syscall number to avoid
conflict with new *attrat syscalls.)
- uprobes/perf: fix user stack traces in the presence of pending
uretprobe. This corrects the uretprobe's trampoline address in the
stacktrace with correct return address
- selftests/x86: Add a return uprobe with shadow stack test
- selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall related tests.
- test case for register integrity check
- test case with register changing case
- test case for uretprobe syscall without uprobes (expected to fail)
- test case for uretprobe with shadow stack
- selftests/bpf: add test validating uprobe/uretprobe stack traces
- MAINTAINERS: Add uprobes entry. This does not specify the tree but
to clarify who maintains and reviews the uprobes
Kprobes:
- tracing/kprobes: Test case cleanups.
Replace redundant WARN_ON_ONCE() + pr_warn() with WARN_ONCE() and
remove unnecessary code from selftest
- tracing/kprobes: Add symbol counting check when module loads.
This checks the uniqueness of the probed symbol on modules. The
same check has already done for kernel symbols
(This also has a fix for build error with CONFIG_MODULES=n)
Cleanup:
- Add MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macros for fprobe and kprobe examples"
* tag 'probes-v6.11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace:
MAINTAINERS: Add uprobes entry
selftests/bpf: Change uretprobe syscall number in uprobe_syscall test
uprobe: Change uretprobe syscall scope and number
tracing/kprobes: Fix build error when find_module() is not available
tracing/kprobes: Add symbol counting check when module loads
selftests/bpf: add test validating uprobe/uretprobe stack traces
perf,uprobes: fix user stack traces in the presence of pending uretprobes
tracing/kprobe: Remove cleanup code unrelated to selftest
tracing/kprobe: Integrate test warnings into WARN_ONCE
selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe shadow stack test
selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall call from user space test
selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall test for regs changes
selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall test for regs integrity
selftests/x86: Add return uprobe shadow stack test
uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe
uprobe: Wire up uretprobe system call
x86/shstk: Make return uprobe work with shadow stack
samples: kprobes: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macros
fprobe: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro
|
|
Add testcase where 7th argument is struct for architectures with 8 argument
registers, and increase the complexity of the struct.
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240702121944.1091530-4-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
|
|
add simple kfuncs to create/destroy a context type to bpf_testmod,
register them and add a kfunc_call test to use them. This provides
test coverage for registration of dtor kfuncs from modules.
By transferring the context pointer to a map value as a __kptr
we also trigger the map-based dtor cleanup logic, improving test
coverage.
Suggested-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240620091733.1967885-7-alan.maguire@oracle.com
|
|
Add special test to be sure that only __nullable BTF params can be
replaced by NULL. This patch adds fake kfuncs in bpf_testmod to
properly test different params.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240613211817.1551967-6-vadfed@meta.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Adding test that creates uprobe consumer on uretprobe which changes some
of the registers. Making sure the changed registers are propagated to the
user space when the ureptobe syscall trampoline is used on x86_64.
To be able to do this, adding support to bpf_testmod to create uprobe via
new attribute file:
/sys/kernel/bpf_testmod_uprobe
This file is expecting file offset and creates related uprobe on current
process exe file and removes existing uprobe if offset is 0. The can be
only single uprobe at any time.
The uprobe has specific consumer that changes registers used in ureprobe
syscall trampoline and which are later checked in the test.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240611112158.40795-7-jolsa@kernel.org/
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
|
|
Pass an additional pointer of bpf_struct_ops_link to callback function reg,
unreg, and update provided by subsystems defined in bpf_struct_ops. A
bpf_struct_ops_map can be registered for multiple links. Passing a pointer
of bpf_struct_ops_link helps subsystems to distinguish them.
This pointer will be used in the later patches to let the subsystem
initiate a detachment on a link that was registered to it previously.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240530065946.979330-2-thinker.li@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
|
|
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2024-05-13
We've added 119 non-merge commits during the last 14 day(s) which contain
a total of 134 files changed, 9462 insertions(+), 4742 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Add BPF JIT support for 32-bit ARCv2 processors, from Shahab Vahedi.
2) Add BPF range computation improvements to the verifier in particular
around XOR and OR operators, refactoring of checks for range computation
and relaxing MUL range computation so that src_reg can also be an unknown
scalar, from Cupertino Miranda.
3) Add support to attach kprobe BPF programs through kprobe_multi link in
a session mode, meaning, a BPF program is attached to both function entry
and return, the entry program can decide if the return program gets
executed and the entry program can share u64 cookie value with return
program. Session mode is a common use-case for tetragon and bpftrace,
from Jiri Olsa.
4) Fix a potential overflow in libbpf's ring__consume_n() and improve libbpf
as well as BPF selftest's struct_ops handling, from Andrii Nakryiko.
5) Improvements to BPF selftests in context of BPF gcc backend,
from Jose E. Marchesi & David Faust.
6) Migrate remaining BPF selftest tests from test_sock_addr.c to prog_test-
-style in order to retire the old test, run it in BPF CI and additionally
expand test coverage, from Jordan Rife.
7) Big batch for BPF selftest refactoring in order to remove duplicate code
around common network helpers, from Geliang Tang.
8) Another batch of improvements to BPF selftests to retire obsolete
bpf_tcp_helpers.h as everything is available vmlinux.h,
from Martin KaFai Lau.
9) Fix BPF map tear-down to not walk the map twice on free when both timer
and wq is used, from Benjamin Tissoires.
10) Fix BPF verifier assumptions about socket->sk that it can be non-NULL,
from Alexei Starovoitov.
11) Change BTF build scripts to using --btf_features for pahole v1.26+,
from Alan Maguire.
12) Small improvements to BPF reusing struct_size() and krealloc_array(),
from Andy Shevchenko.
13) Fix s390 JIT to emit a barrier for BPF_FETCH instructions,
from Ilya Leoshkevich.
14) Extend TCP ->cong_control() callback in order to feed in ack and
flag parameters and allow write-access to tp->snd_cwnd_stamp
from BPF program, from Miao Xu.
15) Add support for internal-only per-CPU instructions to inline
bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper call for arm64 and riscv64 BPF JITs,
from Puranjay Mohan.
16) Follow-up to remove the redundant ethtool.h from tooling infrastructure,
from Tushar Vyavahare.
17) Extend libbpf to support "module:<function>" syntax for tracing
programs, from Viktor Malik.
* tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (119 commits)
bpf: make list_for_each_entry portable
bpf: ignore expected GCC warning in test_global_func10.c
bpf: disable strict aliasing in test_global_func9.c
selftests/bpf: Free strdup memory in xdp_hw_metadata
selftests/bpf: Fix a few tests for GCC related warnings.
bpf: avoid gcc overflow warning in test_xdp_vlan.c
tools: remove redundant ethtool.h from tooling infra
selftests/bpf: Expand ATTACH_REJECT tests
selftests/bpf: Expand getsockname and getpeername tests
sefltests/bpf: Expand sockaddr hook deny tests
selftests/bpf: Expand sockaddr program return value tests
selftests/bpf: Retire test_sock_addr.(c|sh)
selftests/bpf: Remove redundant sendmsg test cases
selftests/bpf: Migrate ATTACH_REJECT test cases
selftests/bpf: Migrate expected_attach_type tests
selftests/bpf: Migrate wildcard destination rewrite test
selftests/bpf: Migrate sendmsg6 v4 mapped address tests
selftests/bpf: Migrate sendmsg deny test cases
selftests/bpf: Migrate WILDCARD_IP test
selftests/bpf: Handle SYSCALL_EPERM and SYSCALL_ENOTSUPP test cases
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240513134114.17575-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
This patch adds a set of kfuncs to bpf_testmod that can be used to
manipulate a socket from kernel space.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240429214529.2644801-3-jrife@google.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
|
|
Cross-merge networking fixes after downstream PR.
Conflicts:
include/linux/filter.h
kernel/bpf/core.c
66e13b615a0c ("bpf: verifier: prevent userspace memory access")
d503a04f8bc0 ("bpf: Add support for certain atomics in bpf_arena to x86 JIT")
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240429114939.210328b0@canb.auug.org.au/
No adjacent changes.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
The vsyscall is a legacy API for fast execution of system calls. It maps
a page at address VSYSCALL_ADDR into the userspace program. This address
is in the top 10MB of the address space:
ffffffffff600000 - ffffffffff600fff | 4 kB | legacy vsyscall ABI
The last commit fixes the x86-64 BPF JIT to skip accessing addresses in
this memory region. Add this address to bpf_testmod_return_ptr() so we
can make sure that it is fixed.
After this change and without the previous commit, subprogs_extable
selftest will crash the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240424100210.11982-4-puranjay@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
We assign the callback and set everything up.
The actual tests of these callbacks will be done when bpf_wq_start() is
available.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240420-bpf_wq-v2-14-6c986a5a741f@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
When loading struct_ops programs kernel requires BTF id of the
struct_ops type and member index for attachment point inside that
type. This makes impossible to use same BPF program in several
struct_ops maps that have different struct_ops type.
Check if libbpf rejects such BPF objects files.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306104529.6453-7-eddyz87@gmail.com
|
|
Extend struct_ops_module test case to check if it is possible to use
'___' suffixes for struct_ops type specification.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306104529.6453-5-eddyz87@gmail.com
|
|
Create and load a struct_ops map with a large number of struct_ops
programs to generate trampolines taking a size over multiple pages. The
map includes 40 programs. Their trampolines takes 6.6k+, more than 1.5
pages, on x86.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240224223418.526631-4-thinker.li@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
|
|
Change the values of fields, including scalar types and function pointers,
and check if the struct_ops map works as expected.
The test changes the field "test_2" of "testmod_1" from the pointer to
test_2() to pointer to test_3() and the field "data" to 13. The function
test_2() and test_3() both compute a new value for "test_2_result", but in
different way. By checking the value of "test_2_result", it ensures the
struct_ops map works as expected with changes through shadow types.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240229064523.2091270-6-thinker.li@gmail.com
|
|
Test if the verifier verifies nullable pointer arguments correctly for BPF
struct_ops programs.
"test_maybe_null" in struct bpf_testmod_ops is the operator defined for the
test cases here.
A BPF program should check a pointer for NULL beforehand to access the
value pointed by the nullable pointer arguments, or the verifier should
reject the programs. The test here includes two parts; the programs
checking pointers properly and the programs not checking pointers
beforehand. The test checks if the verifier accepts the programs checking
properly and rejects the programs not checking at all.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240209023750.1153905-5-thinker.li@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
|
|
"r" is used to receive the return value of test_2 in bpf_testmod.c, but it
is not actually used. So, we remove "r" and change the return type to
"void".
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401300557.z5vzn8FM-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240204061204.1864529-1-thinker.li@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
|
|
This commit marks kfuncs as such inside the .BTF_ids section. The upshot
of these annotations is that we'll be able to automatically generate
kfunc prototypes for downstream users. The process is as follows:
1. In source, use BTF_KFUNCS_START/END macro pair to mark kfuncs
2. During build, pahole injects into BTF a "bpf_kfunc" BTF_DECL_TAG for
each function inside BTF_KFUNCS sets
3. At runtime, vmlinux or module BTF is made available in sysfs
4. At runtime, bpftool (or similar) can look at provided BTF and
generate appropriate prototypes for functions with "bpf_kfunc" tag
To ensure future kfunc are similarly tagged, we now also return error
inside kfunc registration for untagged kfuncs. For vmlinux kfuncs,
we also WARN(), as initcall machinery does not handle errors.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e55150ceecbf0a5d961e608941165c0bee7bc943.1706491398.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
bpf_testmod_exit() does not need to have a return value (given the void),
so this patch drops this useless 'return' in it.
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/5765b287ea088f0c820f2a834faf9b20fb2f8215.1706442113.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn
|
|
Create a new struct_ops type called bpf_testmod_ops within the bpf_testmod
module. When a struct_ops object is registered, the bpf_testmod module will
invoke test_2 from the module.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240119225005.668602-15-thinker.li@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
|
|
It is possible for bpf_kfunc_call_test_release() to be called from
bpf_map_free_deferred() when bpf_testmod is already unloaded and
perf_test_stuct.cnt which it tries to decrease is no longer in memory.
This patch tries to fix the issue by waiting for all references to be
dropped in bpf_testmod_exit().
The issue can be triggered by running 'test_progs -t map_kptr' in 6.5,
but is obscured in 6.6 by d119357d07435 ("rcu-tasks: Treat only
synchronous grace periods urgently").
Fixes: 65eb006d85a2 ("bpf: Move kernel test kfuncs to bpf_testmod")
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/82f55c0e-0ec8-4fe1-8d8c-b1de07558ad9@linux.dev
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240110085737.8895-1-asavkov@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Not all uses of __diag_ignore_all(...) in BPF-related code in order to
suppress warnings are wrapping kfunc definitions. Some "hook point"
definitions - small functions meant to be used as attach points for
fentry and similar BPF progs - need to suppress -Wmissing-declarations.
We could use __bpf_kfunc_{start,end}_defs added in the previous patch in
such cases, but this might be confusing to someone unfamiliar with BPF
internals. Instead, this patch adds __bpf_hook_{start,end} macros,
currently having the same effect as __bpf_kfunc_{start,end}_defs, then
uses them to suppress warnings for two hook points in the kernel itself
and some bpf_testmod hook points as well.
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231031215625.2343848-2-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Adding test that puts kprobe on bpf_fentry_test1 that calls
bpf_kfunc_common_test kfunc, which has also kprobe on.
The latter won't get triggered due to kprobe recursion check
and kprobe missed counter is incremented.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230920213145.1941596-8-jolsa@kernel.org
|
|
The following ldsx cases are tested:
- signed readonly map value
- read/write map value
- probed memory
- not-narrowed ctx field access
- narrowed ctx field access.
Without previous proper verifier/git handling, the test will fail.
If cpuv4 is not supported either by compiler or by jit,
the test will be skipped.
# ./test_progs -t ldsx_insn
#113/1 ldsx_insn/map_val and probed_memory:SKIP
#113/2 ldsx_insn/ctx_member_sign_ext:SKIP
#113/3 ldsx_insn/ctx_member_narrow_sign_ext:SKIP
#113 ldsx_insn:SKIP
Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 3 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230728011336.3723434-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add fentry_many_args.c and fexit_many_args.c to test the fentry/fexit
with 7/11 arguments. As this feature is not supported by arm64 yet, we
disable these testcases for arm64 in DENYLIST.aarch64. We can combine
them with fentry_test.c/fexit_test.c when arm64 is supported too.
Correspondingly, add bpf_testmod_fentry_test7() and
bpf_testmod_fentry_test11() to bpf_testmod.c
Meanwhile, add bpf_modify_return_test2() to test_run.c to test the
MODIFY_RETURN with 7 arguments.
Add bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7 in
bpf_testmod.c to test the struct in the arguments.
And the testcases passed on x86_64:
./test_progs -t fexit
Summary: 5/14 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
./test_progs -t fentry
Summary: 3/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
./test_progs -t modify_return
Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
./test_progs -t tracing_struct
Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230713040738.1789742-4-imagedong@tencent.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Adding missing prototypes for several kfuncs that are used by
test_verifier tests. We don't really need kfunc prototypes for
these tests, but adding them to silence 'make W=1' build and
to have all test kfuncs declarations in bpf_testmod_kfunc.h.
Also moving __diag_pop for -Wmissing-prototypes to cover also
bpf_testmod_test_write and bpf_testmod_test_read and adding
bpf_fentry_shadow_test in there as well. All of them need to
be exported, but there's no need for declarations.
Fixes: 65eb006d85a2 ("bpf: Move kernel test kfuncs to bpf_testmod")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306051319.EihCQZPs-lkp@intel.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230607224046.236510-1-jolsa@kernel.org
|
|
Moving kernel test kfuncs into bpf_testmod kernel module, and adding
necessary init calls and BTF IDs records.
We need to keep following structs in kernel:
struct prog_test_ref_kfunc
struct prog_test_member (embedded in prog_test_ref_kfunc)
The reason is because they need to be marked as rcu safe (check test
prog mark_ref_as_untrusted_or_null) and such objects are being required
to be defined only in kernel at the moment (see rcu_safe_kptr check
in kernel).
We need to keep also dtor functions for both objects in kernel:
bpf_kfunc_call_test_release
bpf_kfunc_call_memb_release
We also keep the copy of these struct in bpf_testmod_kfunc.h, because
other test functions use them. This is unfortunate, but this is just
temporary solution until we are able to these structs them to bpf_testmod
completely.
As suggested by David adding bpf_testmod.ko make dependency for
bpf programs, so they are rebuilt if we change the bpf_testmod.ko
module.
Also adding missing __bpf_kfunc to bpf_kfunc_call_test4 functions.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230515133756.1658301-11-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
There's no need to keep the extern in kfuncs declarations.
Suggested-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230515133756.1658301-10-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Move all kfunc exports into separate bpf_testmod_kfunc.h header file
and include it in tests that need it.
We will move all test kfuncs into bpf_testmod in following change,
so it's convenient to have declarations in single place.
The bpf_testmod_kfunc.h is included by both bpf_testmod and bpf
programs that use test kfuncs.
As suggested by David, the bpf_testmod_kfunc.h includes vmlinux.h
and bpf/bpf_helpers.h for bpf programs build, so the declarations
have proper __ksym attribute and we can resolve all the structs.
Note in kfunc_call_test_subprog.c we can no longer use the sk_state
define from bpf_tcp_helpers.h (because it clashed with vmlinux.h)
and we need to address __sk_common.skc_state field directly.
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230515133756.1658301-3-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add prog test for accessing integer type of variable array in tracing
program.
In addition, hook load_balance function to access sd->span[0], only
to confirm whether the load is successful. Because there is no direct
way to trigger load_balance call.
Co-developed-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230420032735.27760-3-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add -Wmissing-prototypes ignore in bpf_testmod.c, similarly to what we
do in kernel code proper.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304080951.l14IDv3n-lkp@intel.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230412034647.3968143-1-andrii@kernel.org
|
|
Some compilers (for example clang-15) optimize bpf_testmod_loop_test and
remove the loop:
gcc version
(gdb) disassemble bpf_testmod_loop_test
Dump of assembler code for function bpf_testmod_loop_test:
0x0000000000000570 <+0>: callq 0x575 <bpf_testmod_loop_test+5>
0x0000000000000575 <+5>: xor %eax,%eax
0x0000000000000577 <+7>: test %edi,%edi
0x0000000000000579 <+9>: jle 0x587 <bpf_testmod_loop_test+23>
0x000000000000057b <+11>: xor %edx,%edx
0x000000000000057d <+13>: add %edx,%eax
0x000000000000057f <+15>: add $0x1,%edx
0x0000000000000582 <+18>: cmp %edx,%edi
0x0000000000000584 <+20>: jne 0x57d <bpf_testmod_loop_test+13>
0x0000000000000586 <+22>: retq
0x0000000000000587 <+23>: retq
clang-15 version
(gdb) disassemble bpf_testmod_loop_test
Dump of assembler code for function bpf_testmod_loop_test:
0x0000000000000450 <+0>: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
0x0000000000000455 <+5>: test %edi,%edi
0x0000000000000457 <+7>: jle 0x46b <bpf_testmod_loop_test+27>
0x0000000000000459 <+9>: lea -0x1(%rdi),%eax
0x000000000000045c <+12>: lea -0x2(%rdi),%ecx
0x000000000000045f <+15>: imul %rax,%rcx
0x0000000000000463 <+19>: shr %rcx
0x0000000000000466 <+22>: lea -0x1(%rdi,%rcx,1),%eax
0x000000000000046a <+26>: retq
0x000000000000046b <+27>: xor %eax,%eax
0x000000000000046d <+29>: retq
Note: The jne instruction is removed in clang-15 version.
Force the compile to keep the loop by making sum volatile.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230412210423.900851-4-song@kernel.org
|
|
Adds a new test that tries to attach a program to fentry of two
functions of the same name, one located in vmlinux and the other in
bpf_testmod.
To avoid conflicts with existing tests, a new function
"bpf_fentry_shadow_test" was created both in vmlinux and in bpf_testmod.
The previous commit fixed a bug which caused this test to fail. The
verifier would always use the vmlinux function's address as the target
trampoline address, hence trying to create two trampolines for a single
address, which is forbidden.
The test (similarly to other fentry/fexit tests) is not working on arm64
at the moment.
Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5fe2f364190b6f79b085066ed7c5989c5bc475fa.1678432753.git.vmalik@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Implement a trivial iterator returning same specified integer value
N times as part of bpf_testmod kernel module. Add selftests to validate
everything works end to end.
We also reuse these tests as "verification-only" tests to validate that
kernel prints the state of custom kernel module-defined iterator correctly:
fp-16=iter_testmod_seq(ref_id=1,state=drained,depth=0)
"testmod_seq" part is an iterator type, and is coming from module's BTF
data dynamically at runtime.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308184121.1165081-9-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Now that we have the __bpf_kfunc tag, we should use add it to all
existing kfuncs to ensure that they'll never be elided in LTO builds.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230201173016.342758-4-void@manifault.com
|
|
Adding 3 bpf_testmod_fentry_* functions to have a way to test
kprobe multi link on kernel module. They follow bpf_fentry_test*
functions prototypes/code.
Adding equivalent functions to all bpf_fentry_test* does not
seems necessary at the moment, could be added later.
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025134148.3300700-7-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add various struct argument tests with fentry/fexit programs.
Also add one test with a kernel func which does not have any
argument to test BPF_PROG2 macro in such situation.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220831152713.2080039-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Instead of populating multiple sets to indicate some attribute and then
researching the same BTF ID in them, prepare a single unified BTF set
which indicates whether a kfunc is allowed to be called, and also its
attributes if any at the same time. Now, only one call is needed to
perform the lookup for both kfunc availability and its attributes.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220721134245.2450-4-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add test for percpu btf_type_tag. Similar to the "user" tag, we test
the following cases:
1. __percpu struct field.
2. __percpu as function parameter.
3. per_cpu_ptr() accepts dynamically allocated __percpu memory.
Because the test for "user" and the test for "percpu" are very similar,
a little bit of refactoring has been done in btf_tag.c. Basically, both
tests share the same function for loading vmlinux and module btf.
Example output from log:
> ./test_progs -v -t btf_tag
libbpf: prog 'test_percpu1': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
libbpf: prog 'test_percpu1': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
...
; g = arg->a;
1: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0)
R1 is ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 access percpu memory: off=0
...
test_btf_type_tag_mod_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu 0 nsec
#26/6 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_mod1:OK
libbpf: prog 'test_percpu2': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
libbpf: prog 'test_percpu2': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
...
; g = arg->p->a;
2: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0)
R1 is ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 access percpu memory: off=0
...
test_btf_type_tag_mod_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu 0 nsec
#26/7 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_mod2:OK
libbpf: prog 'test_percpu_load': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
libbpf: prog 'test_percpu_load': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
...
; g = (__u64)cgrp->rstat_cpu->updated_children;
2: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +48)
R1 is ptr_cgroup_rstat_cpu access percpu memory: off=48
...
test_btf_type_tag_vmlinux_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu_load 0 nsec
#26/8 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_vmlinux_load:OK
load_btfs:PASS:could not load vmlinux BTF 0 nsec
test_btf_type_tag_vmlinux_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu 0 nsec
test_btf_type_tag_vmlinux_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu_helper 0 nsec
#26/9 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_vmlinux_helper:OK
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304191657.981240-5-haoluo@google.com
|
|
Add several tests to check bpf_core_types_are_compat() functionality:
- candidate type name exists and types match
- candidate type name exists but types don't match
- nested func protos at kernel recursion limit
- nested func protos above kernel recursion limit. Such bpf prog
is rejected during the load.
Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220204005519.60361-3-mcroce@linux.microsoft.com
|
|
Added a selftest with three__user usages: a __user pointer-type argument
in bpf_testmod, a __user pointer-type struct member in bpf_testmod,
and a __user pointer-type struct member in vmlinux. In all cases,
directly accessing the user memory will result verification failure.
$ ./test_progs -v -n 22/3
...
libbpf: prog 'test_user1': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
libbpf: prog 'test_user1': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
R1 type=ctx expected=fp
0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
; int BPF_PROG(test_user1, struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 *arg)
0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)
func 'bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_1' arg0 has btf_id 136561 type STRUCT 'bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1'
1: R1_w=user_ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
; g = arg->a;
1: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0)
R1 invalid mem access 'user_ptr_'
...
#22/3 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_user_mod1:OK
$ ./test_progs -v -n 22/4
...
libbpf: prog 'test_user2': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
libbpf: prog 'test_user2': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
R1 type=ctx expected=fp
0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
; int BPF_PROG(test_user2, struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_2 *arg)
0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)
func 'bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_2' arg0 has btf_id 136563 type STRUCT 'bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_2'
1: R1_w=ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_2(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
; g = arg->p->a;
1: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0) ; R1_w=user_ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
; g = arg->p->a;
2: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0)
R1 invalid mem access 'user_ptr_'
...
#22/4 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_user_mod2:OK
$ ./test_progs -v -n 22/5
...
libbpf: prog 'test_sys_getsockname': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
libbpf: prog 'test_sys_getsockname': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
R1 type=ctx expected=fp
0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
; int BPF_PROG(test_sys_getsockname, int fd, struct sockaddr *usockaddr,
0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8)
func '__sys_getsockname' arg1 has btf_id 2319 type STRUCT 'sockaddr'
1: R1_w=user_ptr_sockaddr(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
; g = usockaddr->sa_family;
1: (69) r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 +0)
R1 invalid mem access 'user_ptr_'
...
#22/5 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_user_vmlinux:OK
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220127154616.659314-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
This adds a complete test case to ensure we never take references to
modules not in MODULE_STATE_LIVE, which can lead to UAF, and it also
ensures we never access btf->kfunc_set_tab in an inconsistent state.
The test uses userfaultfd to artificially widen the race.
When run on an unpatched kernel, it leads to the following splat:
[root@(none) bpf]# ./test_progs -t bpf_mod_race/ksym
[ 55.498171] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffbfff802548b
[ 55.499206] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 55.499855] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[ 55.500555] PGD a4fa9067 P4D a4fa9067 PUD a4fa5067 PMD 1b44067 PTE 0
[ 55.501499] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI
[ 55.502195] CPU: 0 PID: 83 Comm: kworker/0:2 Tainted: G OE 5.16.0-rc4+ #151
[ 55.503388] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ArchLinux 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014
[ 55.504777] Workqueue: events bpf_prog_free_deferred
[ 55.505563] RIP: 0010:kasan_check_range+0x184/0x1d0
[ 55.509140] RSP: 0018:ffff88800560fcf0 EFLAGS: 00010282
[ 55.509977] RAX: fffffbfff802548b RBX: fffffbfff802548c RCX: ffffffff9337b6ba
[ 55.511096] RDX: fffffbfff802548c RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffffffffc012a458
[ 55.512143] RBP: fffffbfff802548b R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffffffc012a45b
[ 55.513228] R10: fffffbfff802548b R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888001b5f598
[ 55.514332] R13: ffff888004f49ac8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888092449400
[ 55.515418] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888092400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 55.516705] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 55.517560] CR2: fffffbfff802548b CR3: 0000000007c10006 CR4: 0000000000770ef0
[ 55.518672] PKRU: 55555554
[ 55.519022] Call Trace:
[ 55.519483] <TASK>
[ 55.519884] module_put.part.0+0x2a/0x180
[ 55.520642] bpf_prog_free_deferred+0x129/0x2e0
[ 55.521478] process_one_work+0x4fa/0x9e0
[ 55.522122] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x100/0x100
[ 55.522878] ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x60/0x60
[ 55.523551] worker_thread+0x2eb/0x700
[ 55.524176] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd8/0xf0
[ 55.524853] ? process_one_work+0x9e0/0x9e0
[ 55.525544] kthread+0x23a/0x270
[ 55.526088] ? set_kthread_struct+0x80/0x80
[ 55.526798] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[ 55.527413] </TASK>
[ 55.527813] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) [last unloaded: bpf_testmod]
[ 55.530846] CR2: fffffbfff802548b
[ 55.531341] ---[ end trace 1af41803c054ad6d ]---
[ 55.532136] RIP: 0010:kasan_check_range+0x184/0x1d0
[ 55.535887] RSP: 0018:ffff88800560fcf0 EFLAGS: 00010282
[ 55.536711] RAX: fffffbfff802548b RBX: fffffbfff802548c RCX: ffffffff9337b6ba
[ 55.537821] RDX: fffffbfff802548c RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffffffffc012a458
[ 55.538899] RBP: fffffbfff802548b R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffffffc012a45b
[ 55.539928] R10: fffffbfff802548b R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888001b5f598
[ 55.541021] R13: ffff888004f49ac8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888092449400
[ 55.542108] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888092400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 55.543260]CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 55.544136] CR2: fffffbfff802548b CR3: 0000000007c10006 CR4: 0000000000770ef0
[ 55.545317] PKRU: 55555554
[ 55.545671] note: kworker/0:2[83] exited with preempt_count 1
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220114163953.1455836-11-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Completely remove the old code for check_kfunc_call to help it work
with modules, and also the callback itself.
The previous commit adds infrastructure to register all sets and put
them in vmlinux or module BTF, and concatenates all related sets
organized by the hook and the type. Once populated, these sets remain
immutable for the lifetime of the struct btf.
Also, since we don't need the 'owner' module anywhere when doing
check_kfunc_call, drop the 'btf_modp' module parameter from
find_kfunc_desc_btf.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220114163953.1455836-4-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add a function to bpf_testmod that returns invalid kernel and user addresses.
Then attach an fexit program to that function that tries to read
memory through these addresses.
This logic checks that bpf_probe_read_kernel and BPF_PROBE_MEM logic is sane.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
Add a writable bare tracepoint in bpf_testmod module, and
trigger its calling when reading /sys/kernel/bpf_testmod
with a specific buffer length. The reading will return
the value in writable context if the early return flag
is enabled in writable context.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211004094857.30868-4-hotforest@gmail.com
|
|
This adds selftests that tests the success and failure path for modules
kfuncs (in presence of invalid kfunc calls) for both libbpf and
gen_loader. It also adds a prog_test kfunc_btf_id_list so that we can
add module BTF ID set from bpf_testmod.
This also introduces a couple of test cases to verifier selftests for
validating whether we get an error or not depending on if invalid kfunc
call remains after elimination of unreachable instructions.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211002011757.311265-10-memxor@gmail.com
|
|
This test uses bpf_get_branch_snapshot from a fexit program. The test uses
a target function (bpf_testmod_loop_test) and compares the record against
kallsyms. If there isn't enough record matching kallsyms, the test fails.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210910183352.3151445-4-songliubraving@fb.com
|
|
Reuse module_attach infrastructure to add a new bare tracepoint to check
we can attach to it as a raw tracepoint.
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210119122237.2426878-3-qais.yousef@arm.com
|
|
Add per-CPU variable to bpf_testmod.ko and use those from new selftest to
validate it works end-to-end.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210112075520.4103414-8-andrii@kernel.org
|
|
Add bpf_testmod module, which is conceptually out-of-tree module and provides
ways for selftests/bpf to test various kernel module-related functionality:
raw tracepoint, fentry/fexit/fmod_ret, etc. This module will be auto-loaded by
test_progs test runner and expected by some of selftests to be present and
loaded.
Pahole currently isn't able to generate BTF for static functions in kernel
modules, so make sure traced function is global.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201203204634.1325171-7-andrii@kernel.org
|
