| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Add few tests validation CO-RE relocation handling of flexible array accesses.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191215070844.1014385-3-andriin@fb.com
|
|
Add test verifying correctness and logic of field size relocation support in
libbpf.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191101222810.1246166-6-andriin@fb.com
|
|
Add a bunch of selftests verifying correctness of relocatable bitfield reading
support in libbpf. Both bpf_probe_read()-based and direct read-based bitfield
macros are tested. core_reloc.c "test_harness" is extended to support raw
tracepoint and new typed raw tracepoints as test BPF program types.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191101222810.1246166-5-andriin@fb.com
|
|
As libbpf is going to gain support for more field relocations, including field
size, some restrictions about exact size match are going to be lifted. Remove
test cases that explicitly test such failures.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191101222810.1246166-2-andriin@fb.com
|
|
test_core_reloc_kernel test captures its own process name and validates
it as part of the test. Given extra "flavors" of test_progs, this break
for anything by default test_progs binary. Fix the test to cut out
flavor part of the process name.
Fixes: ee2eb063d330 ("selftests/bpf: Add BPF_CORE_READ and BPF_CORE_READ_STR_INTO macro tests")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191016060051.2024182-3-andriin@fb.com
|
|
Add a bunch of tests validating CO-RE is handling field existence
relocation. Relaxed CO-RE relocation mode is activated for these new
tests to prevent libbpf from rejecting BPF object for no-match
relocation, even though test BPF program is not going to use that
relocation, if field is missing.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191015182849.3922287-6-andriin@fb.com
|
|
Validate BPF_CORE_READ correctness and handling of up to 9 levels of
nestedness using cyclic task->(group_leader->)*->tgid chains.
Also add a test of maximum-dpeth BPF_CORE_READ_STR_INTO() macro.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191008175942.1769476-8-andriin@fb.com
|
|
On my local machine, I have the following compilation errors:
=====
In file included from prog_tests/core_reloc.c:3:0:
./progs/core_reloc_types.h:517:46: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘fancy_char_ptr_t’
typedef const char * const volatile restrict fancy_char_ptr_t;
^
./progs/core_reloc_types.h:527:2: error: unknown type name ‘fancy_char_ptr_t’
fancy_char_ptr_t d;
^
=====
I am using gcc 4.8.5. Later compilers may change their behavior not emitting the
error. Nevertheless, let us fix the issue. "restrict" can be tested
without typedef.
Fixes: 9654e2ae908e ("selftests/bpf: add CO-RE relocs modifiers/typedef tests")
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add tests validating few edge-cases of capturing offset relocations.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add various tests validating handling compatible/incompatible integer
types.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add test validating correct relocation handling for cases where pointer
to something is used as an array. E.g.:
int *ptr = ...;
int x = ptr[42];
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add tests validating correct handling of various combinations of
typedefs and const/volatile/restrict modifiers.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Test CO-RE relocation handling of ints, enums, pointers, func protos, etc.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add tests for various array handling/relocation scenarios.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add a bunch of test validating correct handling of nested
structs/unions.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add tests verifying that BPF program can use various struct/union
"flavors" to extract data from the same target struct/union.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
