| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
[Changes from V1:
- Avoid conflict by rebasing with latest master.]
Some BPF tests use loop unrolling compiler pragmas that are clang
specific and not supported by GCC. These pragmas, along with their
GCC equivalences are:
#pragma clang loop unroll_count(N)
#pragma GCC unroll N
#pragma clang loop unroll(full)
#pragma GCC unroll 65534
#pragma clang loop unroll(disable)
#pragma GCC unroll 1
#pragma unroll [aka #pragma clang loop unroll(enable)]
There is no GCC equivalence to this pragma. It enables unrolling on
loops that the compiler would not ordinarily unroll even with
-O2|-funroll-loops, but it is not equivalent to full unrolling
either.
This patch adds a new header progs/bpf_compiler.h that defines the
following macros, which correspond to each pair of compiler-specific
pragmas above:
__pragma_loop_unroll_count(N)
__pragma_loop_unroll_full
__pragma_loop_no_unroll
__pragma_loop_unroll
The selftests using loop unrolling pragmas are then changed to include
the header and use these macros in place of the explicit pragmas.
Tested in bpf-next master.
No regressions.
Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240208203612.29611-1-jose.marchesi@oracle.com
|
|
Fix few more SEC() definitions that were previously missed.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103220845.2676888-9-andrii@kernel.org
|
|
Since commit 6c4fc209fcf9d ("bpf: remove useless version check for prog
load") these "version" sections, which result in bpf_attr.kern_version
being set, have been unnecessary.
Remove them so that it's obvious to folks using selftests as a guide that
"modern" BPF progs don't need this section.
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211007231234.2223081-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com
|
|
Analogous to the gso_segs selftests introduced in commit d9ff286a0f59
("bpf: allow BPF programs access skb_shared_info->gso_segs field").
Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@novek.ru>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210909220409.8804-3-vfedorenko@novek.ru
|
|
bpf_prog_test_run_xattr takes a struct __sk_buff, but did not permit
that __skbuff to include an nonzero ingress_ifindex.
This patch updates to allow ingress_ifindex, convert the __sk_buff field to
sk_buff (skb_iif) and back, and tests that the value is present from on BPF
program side. The test sets an unlikely distinct value for ingress_ifindex
(11) from ifindex (1), which is in line with the rest of the synthetic field
tests.
Adding this support allows testing BPF that operates differently on
incoming and outgoing skbs by discriminating on this field.
Signed-off-by: Neil Spring <ntspring@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210831033356.1459316-1-ntspring@fb.com
|
|
Analogous to the gso_segs selftests introduced in commit d9ff286a0f59
("bpf: allow BPF programs access skb_shared_info->gso_segs field").
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200303200503.226217-4-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
|
|
Fix all selftests to include libbpf header files with the bpf/ prefix, to
be consistent with external users of the library. Also ensure that all
includes of exported libbpf header files (those that are exported on 'make
install' of the library) use bracketed includes instead of quoted.
To not break the build, keep the old include path until everything has been
changed to the new one; a subsequent patch will remove that.
Fixes: 6910d7d3867a ("selftests/bpf: Ensure bpf_helper_defs.h are taken from selftests dir")
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/157952560568.1683545.9649335788846513446.stgit@toke.dk
|
|
allow to pass skb's mark field into bpf_prog_test_run ctx
for BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS prog type. that would allow
to test bpf programs which are doing decision based on this
field
Signed-off-by: Nikita V. Shirokov <tehnerd@tehnerd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Make sure we can pass arbitrary data in wire_len/gso_segs.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191213223028.161282-2-sdf@google.com
|
|
Make sure BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN accepts tstamp and exports any
modifications that BPF program does.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191015183125.124413-2-sdf@google.com
|
|
Simple test that sets cb to {1,2,3,4,5} and priority to 6, runs bpf
program that fails if cb is not what we expect and increments cb[i] and
priority. When the test finishes, we check that cb is now {2,3,4,5,6}
and priority is 7.
We also test the sanity checks:
* ctx_in is provided, but ctx_size_in is zero (same for
ctx_out/ctx_size_out)
* unexpected non-zero fields in __sk_buff return EINVAL
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
