summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-12-16selftest/bpf: Add a test that reads various addresses.Alexei Starovoitov
Add a function to bpf_testmod that returns invalid kernel and user addresses. Then attach an fexit program to that function that tries to read memory through these addresses. This logic checks that bpf_probe_read_kernel and BPF_PROBE_MEM logic is sane. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2021-11-15selftests/bpf: Add tests for restricted helpersDmitrii Banshchikov
This patch adds tests that bpf_ktime_get_coarse_ns(), bpf_timer_* and bpf_spin_lock()/bpf_spin_unlock() helpers are forbidden in tracing progs as their use there may result in various locking issues. Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Banshchikov <me@ubique.spb.ru> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211113142227.566439-3-me@ubique.spb.ru
2021-11-06bpf: selftest: Trigger a DCE on the whole subprogMartin KaFai Lau
This patch adds a test to trigger the DCE to remove the whole subprog to ensure the verifier does not depend on a stable subprog index. The DCE is done by testing a global const. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211106014020.651638-1-kafai@fb.com
2021-11-01selftests/bpf: Add a testcase for 64-bit bounds propagation issue.Alexei Starovoitov
./test_progs-no_alu32 -vv -t twfw Before the 64-bit_into_32-bit fix: 19: (25) if r1 > 0x3f goto pc+6 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=63,var_off=(0x0; 0xff),s32_max_value=255,u32_max_value=255) and eventually: invalid access to map value, value_size=8 off=7 size=8 R6 max value is outside of the allowed memory range libbpf: failed to load object 'no_alu32/twfw.o' After the fix: 19: (25) if r1 > 0x3f goto pc+6 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=63,var_off=(0x0; 0x3f)) verif_twfw:OK Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211101222153.78759-3-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2021-11-01selftests/bpf: Fix also no-alu32 strobemeta selftestAndrii Nakryiko
Previous fix aded bpf_clamp_umax() helper use to re-validate boundaries. While that works correctly, it introduces more branches, which blows up past 1 million instructions in no-alu32 variant of strobemeta selftests. Switching len variable from u32 to u64 also fixes the issue and reduces the number of validated instructions, so use that instead. Fix this patch and bpf_clamp_umax() removed, both alu32 and no-alu32 selftests pass. Fixes: 0133c20480b1 ("selftests/bpf: Fix strobemeta selftest regression") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211101230118.1273019-1-andrii@kernel.org
2021-11-01selftests/bpf: Add test cases for struct_ops progHou Tao
Running a BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS prog for dummy_st_ops::test_N() through bpf_prog_test_run(). Four test cases are added: (1) attach dummy_st_ops should fail (2) function return value of bpf_dummy_ops::test_1() is expected (3) pointer argument of bpf_dummy_ops::test_1() works as expected (4) multiple arguments passed to bpf_dummy_ops::test_2() are correct Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211025064025.2567443-5-houtao1@huawei.com
2021-11-01selftests/bpf: Fix strobemeta selftest regressionAndrii Nakryiko
After most recent nightly Clang update strobemeta selftests started failing with the following error (relevant portion of assembly included): 1624: (85) call bpf_probe_read_user_str#114 1625: (bf) r1 = r0 1626: (18) r2 = 0xfffffffe 1628: (5f) r1 &= r2 1629: (55) if r1 != 0x0 goto pc+7 1630: (07) r9 += 104 1631: (6b) *(u16 *)(r9 +0) = r0 1632: (67) r0 <<= 32 1633: (77) r0 >>= 32 1634: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -456) 1635: (0f) r1 += r0 1636: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -456) = r1 1637: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -368) 1638: (c5) if r1 s< 0x1 goto pc+778 1639: (bf) r6 = r8 1640: (0f) r6 += r7 1641: (b4) w1 = 0 1642: (6b) *(u16 *)(r6 +108) = r1 1643: (79) r3 = *(u64 *)(r10 -352) 1644: (79) r9 = *(u64 *)(r10 -456) 1645: (bf) r1 = r9 1646: (b4) w2 = 1 1647: (85) call bpf_probe_read_user_str#114 R1 unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any such access In the above code r0 and r1 are implicitly related. Clang knows that, but verifier isn't able to infer this relationship. Yonghong Song narrowed down this "regression" in code generation to a recent Clang optimization change ([0]), which for BPF target generates code pattern that BPF verifier can't handle and loses track of register boundaries. This patch works around the issue by adding an BPF assembly-based helper that helps to prove to the verifier that upper bound of the register is a given constant by controlling the exact share of generated BPF instruction sequence. This fixes the immediate issue for strobemeta selftest. [0] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/acabad9ff6bf13e00305d9d8621ee8eafc1f8b08 Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211029182907.166910-1-andrii@kernel.org
2021-10-28selftests/bpf: Add weak/typeless ksym test for light skeletonKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Also, avoid using CO-RE features, as lskel doesn't support CO-RE, yet. Include both light and libbpf skeleton in same file to test both of them together. In c48e51c8b07a ("bpf: selftests: Add selftests for module kfunc support"), I added support for generating both lskel and libbpf skel for a BPF object, however the name parameter for bpftool caused collisions when included in same file together. This meant that every test needed a separate file for a libbpf/light skeleton separation instead of subtests. Change that by appending a "_lskel" suffix to the name for files using light skeleton, and convert all existing users. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-7-memxor@gmail.com
2021-10-28bpf/benchs: Add benchmark tests for bloom filter throughput + false positiveJoanne Koong
This patch adds benchmark tests for the throughput (for lookups + updates) and the false positive rate of bloom filter lookups, as well as some minor refactoring of the bash script for running the benchmarks. These benchmarks show that as the number of hash functions increases, the throughput and the false positive rate of the bloom filter decreases. >From the benchmark data, the approximate average false-positive rates are roughly as follows: 1 hash function = ~30% 2 hash functions = ~15% 3 hash functions = ~5% 4 hash functions = ~2.5% 5 hash functions = ~1% 6 hash functions = ~0.5% 7 hash functions = ~0.35% 8 hash functions = ~0.15% 9 hash functions = ~0.1% 10 hash functions = ~0% For reference data, the benchmarks run on one thread on a machine with one numa node for 1 to 5 hash functions for 8-byte and 64-byte values are as follows: 1 hash function: 50k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 51.1 M/s operations Updates - 33.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 24.15% 64-byte value Lookups - 15.7 M/s operations Updates - 15.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 24.2% 100k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 51.0 M/s operations Updates - 33.4 M/s operations False positive rate: 24.04% 64-byte value Lookups - 15.6 M/s operations Updates - 14.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 24.06% 500k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 50.5 M/s operations Updates - 33.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 27.45% 64-byte value Lookups - 15.6 M/s operations Updates - 14.2 M/s operations False positive rate: 27.42% 1 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 49.7 M/s operations Updates - 32.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 27.45% 64-byte value Lookups - 15.4 M/s operations Updates - 13.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 27.58% 2.5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 47.2 M/s operations Updates - 31.8 M/s operations False positive rate: 30.94% 64-byte value Lookups - 15.3 M/s operations Updates - 13.2 M/s operations False positive rate: 30.95% 5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 41.1 M/s operations Updates - 28.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 31.01% 64-byte value Lookups - 13.3 M/s operations Updates - 11.4 M/s operations False positive rate: 30.98% 2 hash functions: 50k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 34.1 M/s operations Updates - 20.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 9.13% 64-byte value Lookups - 8.4 M/s operations Updates - 7.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 9.21% 100k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 33.7 M/s operations Updates - 18.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 9.13% 64-byte value Lookups - 8.4 M/s operations Updates - 7.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 9.19% 500k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 32.7 M/s operations Updates - 18.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 12.61% 64-byte value Lookups - 8.4 M/s operations Updates - 7.5 M/s operations False positive rate: 12.61% 1 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 30.6 M/s operations Updates - 18.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 12.54% 64-byte value Lookups - 8.0 M/s operations Updates - 7.0 M/s operations False positive rate: 12.52% 2.5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 25.3 M/s operations Updates - 16.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 16.77% 64-byte value Lookups - 7.9 M/s operations Updates - 6.5 M/s operations False positive rate: 16.88% 5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 20.8 M/s operations Updates - 14.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 16.78% 64-byte value Lookups - 7.0 M/s operations Updates - 6.0 M/s operations False positive rate: 16.78% 3 hash functions: 50k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 25.1 M/s operations Updates - 14.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 7.65% 64-byte value Lookups - 5.8 M/s operations Updates - 5.5 M/s operations False positive rate: 7.58% 100k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 24.7 M/s operations Updates - 14.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 7.71% 64-byte value Lookups - 5.8 M/s operations Updates - 5.3 M/s operations False positive rate: 7.62% 500k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 22.9 M/s operations Updates - 13.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 2.62% 64-byte value Lookups - 5.6 M/s operations Updates - 4.8 M/s operations False positive rate: 2.7% 1 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 19.8 M/s operations Updates - 12.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 2.60% 64-byte value Lookups - 5.3 M/s operations Updates - 4.4 M/s operations False positive rate: 2.69% 2.5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 16.2 M/s operations Updates - 10.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 4.49% 64-byte value Lookups - 4.9 M/s operations Updates - 4.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 4.41% 5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 18.8 M/s operations Updates - 9.2 M/s operations False positive rate: 4.45% 64-byte value Lookups - 5.2 M/s operations Updates - 3.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 4.54% 4 hash functions: 50k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 19.7 M/s operations Updates - 11.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.01% 64-byte value Lookups - 4.4 M/s operations Updates - 4.0 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.00% 100k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 19.5 M/s operations Updates - 10.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.00% 64-byte value Lookups - 4.3 M/s operations Updates - 3.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.97% 500k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 18.2 M/s operations Updates - 10.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 2.05% 64-byte value Lookups - 4.3 M/s operations Updates - 3.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 2.05% 1 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 15.5 M/s operations Updates - 9.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.99% 64-byte value Lookups - 4.0 M/s operations Updates - 3.4 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.99% 2.5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 13.8 M/s operations Updates - 7.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 3.91% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.7 M/s operations Updates - 3.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 3.78% 5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 13.0 M/s operations Updates - 6.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 3.93% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.5 M/s operations Updates - 3.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 3.39% 5 hash functions: 50k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 16.4 M/s operations Updates - 9.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.78% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.5 M/s operations Updates - 3.2 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.77% 100k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 16.3 M/s operations Updates - 9.0 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.79% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.5 M/s operations Updates - 3.2 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.78% 500k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 15.1 M/s operations Updates - 8.8 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.82% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.4 M/s operations Updates - 3.0 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.78% 1 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 13.2 M/s operations Updates - 7.8 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.81% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.2 M/s operations Updates - 2.8 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.80% 2.5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 10.5 M/s operations Updates - 5.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.29% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.2 M/s operations Updates - 2.4 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.28% 5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 9.6 M/s operations Updates - 5.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.30% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.2 M/s operations Updates - 2.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.30% Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211027234504.30744-5-joannekoong@fb.com
2021-10-28selftests/bpf: Add bloom filter map test casesJoanne Koong
This patch adds test cases for bpf bloom filter maps. They include tests checking against invalid operations by userspace, tests for using the bloom filter map as an inner map, and a bpf program that queries the bloom filter map for values added by a userspace program. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211027234504.30744-4-joannekoong@fb.com
2021-10-25selftests/bpf: Fix test_core_reloc_mods on big-endian machinesIlya Leoshkevich
This is the same as commit d164dd9a5c08 ("selftests/bpf: Fix test_core_autosize on big-endian machines"), but for test_core_reloc_mods. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026010831.748682-7-iii@linux.ibm.com
2021-10-22selftests/bpf: Add BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG typedef example in tag.cYonghong Song
Change value type in progs/tag.c to a typedef with a btf_decl_tag. With `bpftool btf dump file tag.o`, we have ... [14] TYPEDEF 'value_t' type_id=17 [15] DECL_TAG 'tag1' type_id=14 component_idx=-1 [16] DECL_TAG 'tag2' type_id=14 component_idx=-1 [17] STRUCT '(anon)' size=8 vlen=2 'a' type_id=2 bits_offset=0 'b' type_id=2 bits_offset=32 ... The btf_tag selftest also succeeded: $ ./test_progs -t tag #21 btf_tag:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021195643.4020315-1-yhs@fb.com
2021-10-22selftests/bpf: Make perf_buffer selftests work on 4.9 kernel againAndrii Nakryiko
Recent change to use tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep for perf_buffer selftests causes this selftest to fail on 4.9 kernel in libbpf CI ([0]): libbpf: prog 'handle_sys_enter': failed to attach to perf_event FD 6: Invalid argument libbpf: prog 'handle_sys_enter': failed to attach to tracepoint 'syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep': Invalid argument It's not exactly clear why, because perf_event itself is created for this tracepoint, but I can't even compile 4.9 kernel locally, so it's hard to figure this out. If anyone has better luck and would like to help investigating this, I'd really appreciate this. For now, unblock CI by switching back to raw_syscalls/sys_enter, but reduce amount of unnecessary samples emitted by filter by process ID. Use explicit ARRAY map for that to make it work on 4.9 as well, because global data isn't yet supported there. Fixes: aa274f98b269 ("selftests/bpf: Fix possible/online index mismatch in perf_buffer test") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211022201342.3490692-1-andrii@kernel.org
2021-10-21selftests/bpf: Demonstrate use of custom .rodata/.data sectionsAndrii Nakryiko
Enhance existing selftests to demonstrate the use of custom .data/.rodata sections. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021014404.2635234-9-andrii@kernel.org
2021-10-21selftests/bpf: Use nanosleep tracepoint in perf buffer testJiri Olsa
The perf buffer tests triggers trace with nanosleep syscall, but monitors all syscalls, which results in lot of data in the buffer and makes it harder to debug. Let's lower the trace traffic and monitor just nanosleep syscall. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021114132.8196-4-jolsa@kernel.org
2021-10-21selftests/bpf: Test bpf_skc_to_unix_sock() helperHengqi Chen
Add a new test which triggers unix_listen kernel function to test bpf_skc_to_unix_sock helper. Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021134752.1223426-3-hengqi.chen@gmail.com
2021-10-18bpf: Rename BTF_KIND_TAG to BTF_KIND_DECL_TAGYonghong Song
Patch set [1] introduced BTF_KIND_TAG to allow tagging declarations for struct/union, struct/union field, var, func and func arguments and these tags will be encoded into dwarf. They are also encoded to btf by llvm for the bpf target. After BTF_KIND_TAG is introduced, we intended to use it for kernel __user attributes. But kernel __user is actually a type attribute. Upstream and internal discussion showed it is not a good idea to mix declaration attribute and type attribute. So we proposed to introduce btf_type_tag as a type attribute and existing btf_tag renamed to btf_decl_tag ([2]). This patch renamed BTF_KIND_TAG to BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG and some other declarations with *_tag to *_decl_tag to make it clear the tag is for declaration. In the future, BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG might be introduced per [3]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914223004.244411-1-yhs@fb.com/ [2] https://reviews.llvm.org/D111588 [3] https://reviews.llvm.org/D111199 Fixes: b5ea834dde6b ("bpf: Support for new btf kind BTF_KIND_TAG") Fixes: 5b84bd10363e ("libbpf: Add support for BTF_KIND_TAG") Fixes: 5c07f2fec003 ("bpftool: Add support for BTF_KIND_TAG") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211012164838.3345699-1-yhs@fb.com
2021-10-08selftests/bpf: Fix pid check in fexit_sleep testYucong Sun
bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() returns u64, whose upper 32 bits are the same as userspace getpid() return value. Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211006185619.364369-13-fallentree@fb.com
2021-10-08selftests/bpf: Adding pid filtering for atomics testYucong Sun
This make atomics test able to run in parallel with other tests. Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211006185619.364369-11-fallentree@fb.com
2021-10-08selftests/bpf: Make cgroup_v1v2 use its own portYucong Sun
This patch change cgroup_v1v2 use a different port, avoid conflict with other tests. Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211006185619.364369-8-fallentree@fb.com
2021-10-08selftests/bpf: Fix race condition in enable_statsYucong Sun
In parallel execution mode, this test now need to use atomic operation to avoid race condition. Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211006185619.364369-7-fallentree@fb.com
2021-10-08bpf/selftests: Add test for writable bare tracepointHou Tao
Add a writable bare tracepoint in bpf_testmod module, and trigger its calling when reading /sys/kernel/bpf_testmod with a specific buffer length. The reading will return the value in writable context if the early return flag is enabled in writable context. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211004094857.30868-4-hotforest@gmail.com
2021-10-08selftests/bpf: Fix btf_dump test under new clangYucong Sun
New clang version changed ([0]) type name in dwarf from "long int" to "long", this is causing btf_dump tests to fail. [0] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f6a561c4d6754b13165a49990e8365d819f64c86 Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211008173139.1457407-1-fallentree@fb.com
2021-10-07selftests/bpf: Remove SEC("version") from test progsDave Marchevsky
Since commit 6c4fc209fcf9d ("bpf: remove useless version check for prog load") these "version" sections, which result in bpf_attr.kern_version being set, have been unnecessary. Remove them so that it's obvious to folks using selftests as a guide that "modern" BPF progs don't need this section. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211007231234.2223081-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com
2021-10-06selftest/bpf: Switch recursion test to use htab_map_delete_elemJiri Olsa
Currently the recursion test is hooking __htab_map_lookup_elem function, which is invoked both from bpf_prog and bpf syscall. But in our kernel build, the __htab_map_lookup_elem gets inlined within the htab_map_lookup_elem, so it's not trigered and the test fails. Fixing this by using htab_map_delete_elem, which is not inlined for bpf_prog calls (like htab_map_lookup_elem is) and is used directly as pointer for map_delete_elem, so it won't disappear by inlining. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/YVnfFTL/3T6jOwHI@krava
2021-10-05bpf: selftests: Add selftests for module kfunc supportKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
This adds selftests that tests the success and failure path for modules kfuncs (in presence of invalid kfunc calls) for both libbpf and gen_loader. It also adds a prog_test kfunc_btf_id_list so that we can add module BTF ID set from bpf_testmod. This also introduces a couple of test cases to verifier selftests for validating whether we get an error or not depending on if invalid kfunc call remains after elimination of unreachable instructions. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211002011757.311265-10-memxor@gmail.com
2021-10-01selftests/bpf: Use BTF-defined key/value for map definitionsHengqi Chen
Change map definitions in BPF selftests to use BTF-defined key/value types. This unifies the map definitions and ensures libbpf won't emit warning about retrying map creation. Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210930161456.3444544-3-hengqi.chen@gmail.com
2021-09-28selftests/bpf: Fix probe_user test failure with clang build kernelYonghong Song
clang build kernel failed the selftest probe_user. $ ./test_progs -t probe_user $ ... $ test_probe_user:PASS:get_kprobe_res 0 nsec $ test_probe_user:FAIL:check_kprobe_res wrong kprobe res from probe read: 0.0.0.0:0 $ #94 probe_user:FAIL The test attached to kernel function __sys_connect(). In net/socket.c, we have int __sys_connect(int fd, struct sockaddr __user *uservaddr, int addrlen) { ...... } ... SYSCALL_DEFINE3(connect, int, fd, struct sockaddr __user *, uservaddr, int, addrlen) { return __sys_connect(fd, uservaddr, addrlen); } The gcc compiler (8.5.0) does not inline __sys_connect() in syscall entry function. But latest clang trunk did the inlining. So the bpf program is not triggered. To make the test more reliable, let us kprobe the syscall entry function instead. Note that x86_64, arm64 and s390 have syscall wrappers and they have to be handled specially. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210929033000.3711921-1-yhs@fb.com
2021-09-28selftests/bpf: Switch sk_lookup selftests to strict SEC("sk_lookup") useAndrii Nakryiko
Update "sk_lookup/" definition to be a stand-alone type specifier, with backwards-compatible prefix match logic in non-libbpf-1.0 mode. Currently in selftests all the "sk_lookup/<whatever>" uses just use <whatever> for duplicated unique name encoding, which is redundant as BPF program's name (C function name) uniquely and descriptively identifies the intended use for such BPF programs. With libbpf's SEC_DEF("sk_lookup") definition updated, switch existing sk_lookup programs to use "unqualified" SEC("sk_lookup") section names, with no random text after it. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210928161946.2512801-11-andrii@kernel.org
2021-09-28selftests/bpf: Normalize all the rest SEC() usesAndrii Nakryiko
Normalize all the other non-conforming SEC() usages across all selftests. This is in preparation for libbpf to start to enforce stricter SEC() rules in libbpf 1.0 mode. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210928161946.2512801-5-andrii@kernel.org
2021-09-28selftests/bpf: Switch SEC("classifier*") usage to a strict SEC("tc")Andrii Nakryiko
Convert all SEC("classifier*") uses to a new and strict SEC("tc") section name. In reference_tracking selftests switch from ambiguous searching by program title (section name) to non-ambiguous searching by name in some selftests, getting closer to completely removing bpf_object__find_program_by_title(). Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210928161946.2512801-4-andrii@kernel.org
2021-09-28selftests/bpf: Normalize XDP section names in selftestsAndrii Nakryiko
Convert almost all SEC("xdp_blah") uses to strict SEC("xdp") to comply with strict libbpf 1.0 logic of exact section name match for XDP program types. There is only one exception, which is only tested through iproute2 and defines multiple XDP programs within the same BPF object. Given iproute2 still works in non-strict libbpf mode and it doesn't have means to specify XDP programs by its name (not section name/title), leave that single file alone for now until iproute2 gains lookup by function/program name. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210928161946.2512801-3-andrii@kernel.org
2021-09-26bpf: selftest: A bpf prog that has a 32bit scalar spillMartin KaFai Lau
It is a simplified example that can trigger a 32bit scalar spill. The const scalar is refilled and added to a skb->data later. Since the reg state of the 32bit scalar spill is not saved now, adding the refilled reg to skb->data and then comparing it with skb->data_end cannot verify the skb->data access. With the earlier verifier patch and the llvm patch [1]. The verifier can correctly verify the bpf prog. Here is the snippet of the verifier log that leads to verifier conclusion that the packet data is unsafe to read. The log is from the kerne without the previous verifier patch to save the <8-byte scalar spill. 67: R0=inv1 R1=inv17 R2=invP2 R3=inv1 R4=pkt(id=0,off=68,r=102,imm=0) R5=inv102 R6=pkt(id=0,off=62,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=102,imm=0) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9=inv17 R10=fp0 67: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -12) = r5 68: R0=inv1 R1=inv17 R2=invP2 R3=inv1 R4=pkt(id=0,off=68,r=102,imm=0) R5=inv102 R6=pkt(id=0,off=62,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=102,imm=0) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9=inv17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmm???? ... 101: R0_w=map_value_or_null(id=2,off=0,ks=16,vs=1,imm=0) R6_w=pkt(id=0,off=70,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=102,imm=0) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9=inv17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmmmmmm 101: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r10 -12) 102: R0_w=map_value_or_null(id=2,off=0,ks=16,vs=1,imm=0) R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6_w=pkt(id=0,off=70,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=102,imm=0) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9=inv17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmmmmmm 102: (bc) w1 = w1 103: R0_w=map_value_or_null(id=2,off=0,ks=16,vs=1,imm=0) R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6_w=pkt(id=0,off=70,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=102,imm=0) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9=inv17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmmmmmm 103: (0f) r7 += r1 last_idx 103 first_idx 67 regs=2 stack=0 before 102: (bc) w1 = w1 regs=2 stack=0 before 101: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r10 -12) 104: R0_w=map_value_or_null(id=2,off=0,ks=16,vs=1,imm=0) R1_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6_w=pkt(id=0,off=70,r=102,imm=0) R7_w=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9=inv17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmmmmmm ... 127: R0_w=inv1 R1=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6=pkt(id=0,off=70,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9_w=invP17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmmmmmm 127: (bf) r1 = r7 128: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6=pkt(id=0,off=70,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9_w=invP17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmmmmmm 128: (07) r1 += 8 129: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=pkt(id=3,off=8,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6=pkt(id=0,off=70,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9_w=invP17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmmmmmm 129: (b4) w0 = 1 130: R0=inv1 R1=pkt(id=3,off=8,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6=pkt(id=0,off=70,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9=invP17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmmmmmm 130: (2d) if r1 > r8 goto pc-66 R0=inv1 R1=pkt(id=3,off=8,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6=pkt(id=0,off=70,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9=invP17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmmmmmm 131: R0=inv1 R1=pkt(id=3,off=8,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6=pkt(id=0,off=70,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9=invP17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmmmmmm 131: (69) r6 = *(u16 *)(r7 +0) invalid access to packet, off=0 size=2, R7(id=3,off=0,r=0) R7 offset is outside of the packet [1]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109073 Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210922004947.626286-1-kafai@fb.com
2021-09-17selftests/bpf: Add trace_vprintk test progDave Marchevsky
This commit adds a test prog for vprintk which confirms that: * bpf_trace_vprintk is writing to /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe * __bpf_vprintk macro works as expected * >3 args are printed * bpf_printk w/ 0 format args compiles * bpf_trace_vprintk call w/ a fmt specifier but NULL fmt data fails Approach and code are borrowed from trace_printk test. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210917182911.2426606-9-davemarchevsky@fb.com
2021-09-17Merge https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-nextJakub Kicinski
Alexei Starovoitov says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2021-09-17 We've added 63 non-merge commits during the last 12 day(s) which contain a total of 65 files changed, 2653 insertions(+), 751 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Streamline internal BPF program sections handling and bpf_program__set_attach_target() in libbpf, from Andrii. 2) Add support for new btf kind BTF_KIND_TAG, from Yonghong. 3) Introduce bpf_get_branch_snapshot() to capture LBR, from Song. 4) IMUL optimization for x86-64 JIT, from Jie. 5) xsk selftest improvements, from Magnus. 6) Introduce legacy kprobe events support in libbpf, from Rafael. 7) Access hw timestamp through BPF's __sk_buff, from Vadim. * https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (63 commits) selftests/bpf: Fix a few compiler warnings libbpf: Constify all high-level program attach APIs libbpf: Schedule open_opts.attach_prog_fd deprecation since v0.7 selftests/bpf: Switch fexit_bpf2bpf selftest to set_attach_target() API libbpf: Allow skipping attach_func_name in bpf_program__set_attach_target() libbpf: Deprecated bpf_object_open_opts.relaxed_core_relocs selftests/bpf: Stop using relaxed_core_relocs which has no effect libbpf: Use pre-setup sec_def in libbpf_find_attach_btf_id() bpf: Update bpf_get_smp_processor_id() documentation libbpf: Add sphinx code documentation comments selftests/bpf: Skip btf_tag test if btf_tag attribute not supported docs/bpf: Add documentation for BTF_KIND_TAG selftests/bpf: Add a test with a bpf program with btf_tag attributes selftests/bpf: Test BTF_KIND_TAG for deduplication selftests/bpf: Add BTF_KIND_TAG unit tests selftests/bpf: Change NAME_NTH/IS_NAME_NTH for BTF_KIND_TAG format selftests/bpf: Test libbpf API function btf__add_tag() bpftool: Add support for BTF_KIND_TAG libbpf: Add support for BTF_KIND_TAG libbpf: Rename btf_{hash,equal}_int to btf_{hash,equal}_int_tag ... ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210917173738.3397064-1-ast@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-09-15selftests/bpf: Skip btf_tag test if btf_tag attribute not supportedYonghong Song
Commit c240ba287890 ("selftests/bpf: Add a test with a bpf program with btf_tag attributes") added btf_tag selftest to test BTF_KIND_TAG generation from C source code, and to test kernel validation of generated BTF types. But if an old clang (clang 13 or earlier) is used, the following compiler warning may be seen: progs/tag.c:23:20: warning: unknown attribute 'btf_tag' ignored and the test itself is marked OK. The compiler warning is bad and the test itself shouldn't be marked OK. This patch added the check for btf_tag attribute support. If btf_tag is not supported by the clang, the attribute will not be used in the code and the test will be marked as skipped. For example, with clang 13: ./test_progs -t btf_tag #21 btf_tag:SKIP Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 1 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED The selftests/README.rst is updated to clarify when the btf_tag test may be skipped. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210915061036.2577971-1-yhs@fb.com
2021-09-14selftests/bpf: Add a test with a bpf program with btf_tag attributesYonghong Song
Add a bpf program with btf_tag attributes. The program is loaded successfully with the kernel. With the command bpftool btf dump file ./tag.o the following dump shows that tags are properly encoded: [8] STRUCT 'key_t' size=12 vlen=3 'a' type_id=2 bits_offset=0 'b' type_id=2 bits_offset=32 'c' type_id=2 bits_offset=64 [9] TAG 'tag1' type_id=8 component_id=-1 [10] TAG 'tag2' type_id=8 component_id=-1 [11] TAG 'tag1' type_id=8 component_id=1 [12] TAG 'tag2' type_id=8 component_id=1 ... [21] FUNC_PROTO '(anon)' ret_type_id=2 vlen=1 'x' type_id=2 [22] FUNC 'foo' type_id=21 linkage=static [23] TAG 'tag1' type_id=22 component_id=0 [24] TAG 'tag2' type_id=22 component_id=0 [25] TAG 'tag1' type_id=22 component_id=-1 [26] TAG 'tag2' type_id=22 component_id=-1 ... [29] VAR 'total' type_id=27, linkage=global [30] TAG 'tag1' type_id=29 component_id=-1 [31] TAG 'tag2' type_id=29 component_id=-1 If an old clang compiler, which does not support btf_tag attribute, is used, these btf_tag attributes will be silently ignored. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914223058.248949-1-yhs@fb.com
2021-09-14selftests/bpf: Update selftests to always provide "struct_ops" SECAndrii Nakryiko
Update struct_ops selftests to always specify "struct_ops" section prefix. Libbpf will require a proper BPF program type set in the next patch, so this prevents tests breaking. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914014733.2768-2-andrii@kernel.org
2021-09-13bpf, selftests: Add test case for mixed cgroup v1/v2Daniel Borkmann
Minimal selftest which implements a small BPF policy program to the connect(2) hook which rejects TCP connection requests to port 60123 with EPERM. This is being attached to a non-root cgroup v2 path. The test asserts that this works under cgroup v2-only and under a mixed cgroup v1/v2 environment where net_classid is set in the former case. Before fix: # ./test_progs -t cgroup_v1v2 test_cgroup_v1v2:PASS:server_fd 0 nsec test_cgroup_v1v2:PASS:client_fd 0 nsec test_cgroup_v1v2:PASS:cgroup_fd 0 nsec test_cgroup_v1v2:PASS:server_fd 0 nsec run_test:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec run_test:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec test_cgroup_v1v2:PASS:cgroup-v2-only 0 nsec run_test:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec run_test:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec run_test:PASS:join_classid 0 nsec (network_helpers.c:219: errno: None) Unexpected success to connect to server test_cgroup_v1v2:FAIL:cgroup-v1v2 unexpected error: -1 (errno 0) #27 cgroup_v1v2:FAIL Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED After fix: # ./test_progs -t cgroup_v1v2 #27 cgroup_v1v2:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210913230759.2313-3-daniel@iogearbox.net
2021-09-13bpf, selftests: Replicate tailcall limit test for indirect call caseDaniel Borkmann
The tailcall_3 test program uses bpf_tail_call_static() where the JIT would patch a direct jump. Add a new tailcall_6 test program replicating exactly the same test just ensuring that bpf_tail_call() uses a map index where the verifier cannot make assumptions this time. In other words, this will now cover both on x86-64 JIT, meaning, JIT images with emit_bpf_tail_call_direct() emission as well as JIT images with emit_bpf_tail_call_indirect() emission. # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable # ./test_progs -t tailcalls #136/1 tailcalls/tailcall_1:OK #136/2 tailcalls/tailcall_2:OK #136/3 tailcalls/tailcall_3:OK #136/4 tailcalls/tailcall_4:OK #136/5 tailcalls/tailcall_5:OK #136/6 tailcalls/tailcall_6:OK #136/7 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_1:OK #136/8 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_2:OK #136/9 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_3:OK #136/10 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_4:OK #136/11 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_5:OK #136 tailcalls:OK Summary: 1/11 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED # echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable # ./test_progs -t tailcalls #136/1 tailcalls/tailcall_1:OK #136/2 tailcalls/tailcall_2:OK #136/3 tailcalls/tailcall_3:OK #136/4 tailcalls/tailcall_4:OK #136/5 tailcalls/tailcall_5:OK #136/6 tailcalls/tailcall_6:OK [...] For interpreter, the tailcall_1-6 tests are passing as well. The later tailcall_bpf2bpf_* are failing due lack of bpf2bpf + tailcall support in interpreter, so this is expected. Also, manual inspection shows that both loaded programs from tailcall_3 and tailcall_6 test case emit the expected opcodes: * tailcall_3 disasm, emit_bpf_tail_call_direct(): [...] b: push %rax c: push %rbx d: push %r13 f: mov %rdi,%rbx 12: movabs $0xffff8d3f5afb0200,%r13 1c: mov %rbx,%rdi 1f: mov %r13,%rsi 22: xor %edx,%edx _ 24: mov -0x4(%rbp),%eax | limit check 2a: cmp $0x20,%eax | 2d: ja 0x0000000000000046 | 2f: add $0x1,%eax | 32: mov %eax,-0x4(%rbp) |_ 38: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1) 3d: pop %r13 3f: pop %rbx 40: pop %rax 41: jmpq 0xffffffffffffe377 [...] * tailcall_6 disasm, emit_bpf_tail_call_indirect(): [...] 47: movabs $0xffff8d3f59143a00,%rsi 51: mov %edx,%edx 53: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi) 56: jbe 0x0000000000000093 _ 58: mov -0x4(%rbp),%eax | limit check 5e: cmp $0x20,%eax | 61: ja 0x0000000000000093 | 63: add $0x1,%eax | 66: mov %eax,-0x4(%rbp) |_ 6c: mov 0x110(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rcx 74: test %rcx,%rcx 77: je 0x0000000000000093 79: pop %rax 7a: mov 0x30(%rcx),%rcx 7e: add $0xb,%rcx 82: callq 0x000000000000008e 87: pause 89: lfence 8c: jmp 0x0000000000000087 8e: mov %rcx,(%rsp) 92: retq [...] Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Acked-by: Paul Chaignon <paul@cilium.io> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAM1=_QRyRVCODcXo_Y6qOm1iT163HoiSj8U2pZ8Rj3hzMTT=HQ@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210910091900.16119-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
2021-09-13selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_get_branch_snapshotSong Liu
This test uses bpf_get_branch_snapshot from a fexit program. The test uses a target function (bpf_testmod_loop_test) and compares the record against kallsyms. If there isn't enough record matching kallsyms, the test fails. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210910183352.3151445-4-songliubraving@fb.com
2021-09-10selftests/bpf: Test new __sk_buff field hwtstampVadim Fedorenko
Analogous to the gso_segs selftests introduced in commit d9ff286a0f59 ("bpf: allow BPF programs access skb_shared_info->gso_segs field"). Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@novek.ru> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210909220409.8804-3-vfedorenko@novek.ru
2021-09-07bpf: Permit ingress_ifindex in bpf_prog_test_run_xattrNeil Spring
bpf_prog_test_run_xattr takes a struct __sk_buff, but did not permit that __skbuff to include an nonzero ingress_ifindex. This patch updates to allow ingress_ifindex, convert the __sk_buff field to sk_buff (skb_iif) and back, and tests that the value is present from on BPF program side. The test sets an unlikely distinct value for ingress_ifindex (11) from ifindex (1), which is in line with the rest of the synthetic field tests. Adding this support allows testing BPF that operates differently on incoming and outgoing skbs by discriminating on this field. Signed-off-by: Neil Spring <ntspring@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210831033356.1459316-1-ntspring@fb.com
2021-09-07selftests/bpf: Fix build of task_pt_regs test for arm64Jean-Philippe Brucker
struct pt_regs is not exported to userspace on all archs. arm64 and s390 export "user_pt_regs" instead, which causes build failure at the moment: progs/test_task_pt_regs.c:8:16: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct pt_regs' struct pt_regs current_regs = {}; Instead of using pt_regs from ptrace.h, use the larger kernel struct from vmlinux.h directly. Since the test runner task_pt_regs.c does not have access to the kernel struct definition, copy it into a char array. Fixes: 576d47bb1a92 ("bpf: selftests: Add bpf_task_pt_regs() selftest") Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210906163635.302307-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org
2021-08-25bpf: selftests: Add dctcp fallback testMartin KaFai Lau
This patch makes the bpf_dctcp test to fallback to cubic by using setsockopt(TCP_CONGESTION) when the tcp flow is not ecn ready. It also checks setsockopt() is not available to release(). The settimeo() from the network_helpers.h is used, so the local one is removed. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210824173026.3979130-1-kafai@fb.com
2021-08-25bpf: selftests: Add sk_state to bpf_tcp_helpers.hMartin KaFai Lau
Add sk_state define to bpf_tcp_helpers.h. Rename the existing global variable "sk_state" in the kfunc_call test to "sk_state_res". Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210824173013.3977316-1-kafai@fb.com
2021-08-25bpf: selftests: Add bpf_task_pt_regs() selftestDaniel Xu
This test retrieves the uprobe's pt_regs in two different ways and compares the contents in an arch-agnostic way. Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/5581eb8800f6625ec8813fe21e9dce1fbdef4937.1629772842.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz
2021-08-24selftests/bpf: Test for get_netns_cookieXu Liu
Add test to use get_netns_cookie() from BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG. Signed-off-by: Xu Liu <liuxu623@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210820071712.52852-3-liuxu623@gmail.com
2021-08-20selftests/bpf: Add tests for {set|get} socket option from setsockopt BPFPrankur Gupta
Adding selftests for the newly added functionality to call bpf_setsockopt() and bpf_getsockopt() from setsockopt BPF programs. Test Details: 1. BPF Program Checks for changes in IPV6_TCLASS(SOL_IPV6) via setsockopt If the cca for the socket is not cubic do nothing If the newly set value for IPV6_TCLASS is 45 (0x2d) (as per our use-case) then change the cc from cubic to reno 2. User Space Program Creates an AF_INET6 socket and set the cca for that to be "cubic" Attach the program and set the IPV6_TCLASS to 0x2d using setsockopt Verify the cca for the socket changed to reno Signed-off-by: Prankur Gupta <prankgup@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210817224221.3257826-3-prankgup@fb.com
2021-08-19selftests/bpf: Test for get_netns_cookieXu Liu
Add test to use get_netns_cookie() from BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS. Signed-off-by: Xu Liu <liuxu623@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210818105820.91894-3-liuxu623@gmail.com
generated by cgit (git 2.34.1) at 2024-05-25 06:21:33 +0000