From 73ae7e1c7644a8c33ba526302a10267cdbc249f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Niklas Cassel Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:57:44 +0100 Subject: ata: libata-sata: improve sysfs description for ATA_LPM_UNKNOWN Currently, both ATA_LPM_UNKNOWN (0) and ATA_LPM_MAX_POWER (1) displays as "max_performance" in sysfs. This is quite misleading as they are not the same. For ATA_LPM_UNKNOWN, ata_eh_set_lpm() will not be called at all, leaving the configuration in unknown state. For ATA_LPM_MAX_POWER, ata_eh_set_lpm() is called, and setting the policy to ATA_LPM_MAX_POWER. This also matches the description of the SATA_MOBILE_LPM_POLICY Kconfig: 0 => Keep firmware settings 1 => Maximum performance Thus, update the sysfs description for ATA_LPM_UNKNOWN to match reality. While at it, update libata.h to mention that the ascii descriptions are in libata-sata.c and not in libata-scsi.c. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel --- drivers/ata/libata-sata.c | 2 +- include/linux/libata.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-sata.c b/drivers/ata/libata-sata.c index b6656c287175..0fb1934875f2 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-sata.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-sata.c @@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ bool sata_lpm_ignore_phy_events(struct ata_link *link) EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sata_lpm_ignore_phy_events); static const char *ata_lpm_policy_names[] = { - [ATA_LPM_UNKNOWN] = "max_performance", + [ATA_LPM_UNKNOWN] = "keep_firmware_settings", [ATA_LPM_MAX_POWER] = "max_performance", [ATA_LPM_MED_POWER] = "medium_power", [ATA_LPM_MED_POWER_WITH_DIPM] = "med_power_with_dipm", diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h index 1dbb14daccfa..26d68115afb8 100644 --- a/include/linux/libata.h +++ b/include/linux/libata.h @@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ enum ata_completion_errors { /* * Link power management policy: If you alter this, you also need to - * alter libata-scsi.c (for the ascii descriptions) + * alter libata-sata.c (for the ascii descriptions) */ enum ata_lpm_policy { ATA_LPM_UNKNOWN, -- cgit From 0077a504e1a4468669fd2e011108db49133db56e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Conrad Kostecki Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 19:30:02 +0100 Subject: ahci: asm1166: correct count of reported ports The ASM1166 SATA host controller always reports wrongly, that it has 32 ports. But in reality, it only has six ports. This seems to be a hardware issue, as all tested ASM1166 SATA host controllers reports such high count of ports. Example output: ahci 0000:09:00.0: AHCI 0001.0301 32 slots 32 ports 6 Gbps 0xffffff3f impl SATA mode. By adjusting the port_map, the count is limited to six ports. New output: ahci 0000:09:00.0: AHCI 0001.0301 32 slots 32 ports 6 Gbps 0x3f impl SATA mode. Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211873 Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218346 Signed-off-by: Conrad Kostecki Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel --- drivers/ata/ahci.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c index 3a5f3255f51b..762c5d8b7c1a 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c @@ -663,6 +663,11 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(mobile_lpm_policy, "Default LPM policy for mobile chipsets"); static void ahci_pci_save_initial_config(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv) { + if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ASMEDIA && pdev->device == 0x1166) { + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "ASM1166 has only six ports\n"); + hpriv->saved_port_map = 0x3f; + } + if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_JMICRON && pdev->device == 0x2361) { dev_info(&pdev->dev, "JMB361 has only one port\n"); hpriv->saved_port_map = 1; -- cgit From 20730e9b277873deeb6637339edcba64468f3da3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lennert Buytenhek Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:04:01 +0200 Subject: ahci: add 43-bit DMA address quirk for ASMedia ASM1061 controllers With one of the on-board ASM1061 AHCI controllers (1b21:0612) on an ASUSTeK Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI mainboard, a controller hang was observed that was immediately preceded by the following kernel messages: ahci 0000:28:00.0: Using 64-bit DMA addresses ahci 0000:28:00.0: AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT domain=0x0035 address=0x7fffff00000 flags=0x0000] ahci 0000:28:00.0: AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT domain=0x0035 address=0x7fffff00300 flags=0x0000] ahci 0000:28:00.0: AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT domain=0x0035 address=0x7fffff00380 flags=0x0000] ahci 0000:28:00.0: AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT domain=0x0035 address=0x7fffff00400 flags=0x0000] ahci 0000:28:00.0: AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT domain=0x0035 address=0x7fffff00680 flags=0x0000] ahci 0000:28:00.0: AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT domain=0x0035 address=0x7fffff00700 flags=0x0000] The first message is produced by code in drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c which is accompanied by the following comment that seems to apply: /* * Try to use all the 32-bit PCI addresses first. The original SAC vs. * DAC reasoning loses relevance with PCIe, but enough hardware and * firmware bugs are still lurking out there that it's safest not to * venture into the 64-bit space until necessary. * * If your device goes wrong after seeing the notice then likely either * its driver is not setting DMA masks accurately, the hardware has * some inherent bug in handling >32-bit addresses, or not all the * expected address bits are wired up between the device and the IOMMU. */ Asking the ASM1061 on a discrete PCIe card to DMA from I/O virtual address 0xffffffff00000000 produces the following I/O page faults: vfio-pci 0000:07:00.0: AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT domain=0x0021 address=0x7ff00000000 flags=0x0010] vfio-pci 0000:07:00.0: AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT domain=0x0021 address=0x7ff00000500 flags=0x0010] Note that the upper 21 bits of the logged DMA address are zero. (When asking a different PCIe device in the same PCIe slot to DMA to the same I/O virtual address, we do see all the upper 32 bits of the DMA address as 1, so this is not an issue with the chipset or IOMMU configuration on the test system.) Also, hacking libahci to always set the upper 21 bits of all DMA addresses to 1 produces no discernible effect on the behavior of the ASM1061, and mkfs/mount/scrub/etc work as without this hack. This all strongly suggests that the ASM1061 has a 43 bit DMA address limit, and this commit therefore adds a quirk to deal with this limit. This issue probably applies to (some of) the other supported ASMedia parts as well, but we limit it to the PCI IDs known to refer to ASM1061 parts, as that's the only part we know for sure to be affected by this issue at this point. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ide/ZaZ2PIpEId-rl6jv@wantstofly.org/ Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek [cassel: drop date from error messages in commit log] Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel --- drivers/ata/ahci.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ drivers/ata/ahci.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c index 762c5d8b7c1a..d2460fa985b7 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ enum { enum board_ids { /* board IDs by feature in alphabetical order */ board_ahci, + board_ahci_43bit_dma, board_ahci_ign_iferr, board_ahci_low_power, board_ahci_no_debounce_delay, @@ -128,6 +129,13 @@ static const struct ata_port_info ahci_port_info[] = { .udma_mask = ATA_UDMA6, .port_ops = &ahci_ops, }, + [board_ahci_43bit_dma] = { + AHCI_HFLAGS (AHCI_HFLAG_43BIT_ONLY), + .flags = AHCI_FLAG_COMMON, + .pio_mask = ATA_PIO4, + .udma_mask = ATA_UDMA6, + .port_ops = &ahci_ops, + }, [board_ahci_ign_iferr] = { AHCI_HFLAGS (AHCI_HFLAG_IGN_IRQ_IF_ERR), .flags = AHCI_FLAG_COMMON, @@ -597,11 +605,11 @@ static const struct pci_device_id ahci_pci_tbl[] = { { PCI_VDEVICE(PROMISE, 0x3f20), board_ahci }, /* PDC42819 */ { PCI_VDEVICE(PROMISE, 0x3781), board_ahci }, /* FastTrak TX8660 ahci-mode */ - /* Asmedia */ + /* ASMedia */ { PCI_VDEVICE(ASMEDIA, 0x0601), board_ahci }, /* ASM1060 */ { PCI_VDEVICE(ASMEDIA, 0x0602), board_ahci }, /* ASM1060 */ - { PCI_VDEVICE(ASMEDIA, 0x0611), board_ahci }, /* ASM1061 */ - { PCI_VDEVICE(ASMEDIA, 0x0612), board_ahci }, /* ASM1062 */ + { PCI_VDEVICE(ASMEDIA, 0x0611), board_ahci_43bit_dma }, /* ASM1061 */ + { PCI_VDEVICE(ASMEDIA, 0x0612), board_ahci_43bit_dma }, /* ASM1061/1062 */ { PCI_VDEVICE(ASMEDIA, 0x0621), board_ahci }, /* ASM1061R */ { PCI_VDEVICE(ASMEDIA, 0x0622), board_ahci }, /* ASM1062R */ { PCI_VDEVICE(ASMEDIA, 0x0624), board_ahci }, /* ASM1062+JMB575 */ @@ -954,11 +962,20 @@ static int ahci_pci_device_resume(struct device *dev) #endif /* CONFIG_PM */ -static int ahci_configure_dma_masks(struct pci_dev *pdev, int using_dac) +static int ahci_configure_dma_masks(struct pci_dev *pdev, + struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv) { - const int dma_bits = using_dac ? 64 : 32; + int dma_bits; int rc; + if (hpriv->cap & HOST_CAP_64) { + dma_bits = 64; + if (hpriv->flags & AHCI_HFLAG_43BIT_ONLY) + dma_bits = 43; + } else { + dma_bits = 32; + } + /* * If the device fixup already set the dma_mask to some non-standard * value, don't extend it here. This happens on STA2X11, for example. @@ -1931,7 +1948,7 @@ static int ahci_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) ahci_gtf_filter_workaround(host); /* initialize adapter */ - rc = ahci_configure_dma_masks(pdev, hpriv->cap & HOST_CAP_64); + rc = ahci_configure_dma_masks(pdev, hpriv); if (rc) return rc; diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.h b/drivers/ata/ahci.h index 4bae95b06ae3..df8f8a1a3a34 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.h +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.h @@ -247,6 +247,7 @@ enum { AHCI_HFLAG_SUSPEND_PHYS = BIT(26), /* handle PHYs during suspend/resume */ AHCI_HFLAG_NO_SXS = BIT(28), /* SXS not supported */ + AHCI_HFLAG_43BIT_ONLY = BIT(29), /* 43bit DMA addr limit */ /* ap->flags bits */ -- cgit