From d5d92b64408443e113b9742f8f1c35278910dd4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daejun Park Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 15:05:29 +0900 Subject: scsi: ufs: core: Fix referencing invalid rsp field Fix referencing sense data when it is invalid. When the length of the data segment is 0, there is no valid information in the rsp field, so ufshpb_rsp_upiu() is returned without additional operation. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/252651381.41652940482659.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp4 Fixes: 4b5f49079c52 ("scsi: ufs: ufshpb: L2P map management for HPB read") Acked-by: Avri Altman Signed-off-by: Daejun Park Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c | 19 +++++++------------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c index 81099b68bbfb..588c0329b80c 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c @@ -1254,6 +1254,13 @@ void ufshpb_rsp_upiu(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp) struct utp_hpb_rsp *rsp_field = &lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr->hr; int data_seg_len; + data_seg_len = be32_to_cpu(lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr->header.dword_2) + & MASK_RSP_UPIU_DATA_SEG_LEN; + + /* If data segment length is zero, rsp_field is not valid */ + if (!data_seg_len) + return; + if (unlikely(lrbp->lun != rsp_field->lun)) { struct scsi_device *sdev; bool found = false; @@ -1288,18 +1295,6 @@ void ufshpb_rsp_upiu(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp) return; } - data_seg_len = be32_to_cpu(lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr->header.dword_2) - & MASK_RSP_UPIU_DATA_SEG_LEN; - - /* To flush remained rsp_list, we queue the map_work task */ - if (!data_seg_len) { - if (!ufshpb_is_general_lun(hpb->lun)) - return; - - ufshpb_kick_map_work(hpb); - return; - } - BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct utp_hpb_rsp) != UTP_HPB_RSP_SIZE); if (!ufshpb_is_hpb_rsp_valid(hba, lrbp, rsp_field)) -- cgit