From 0ffd643875d3f7dac3cd9fbc637a3645c48ba21f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:27:44 +0200 Subject: docs: x86: avoid using ReST :doc:`foo` markup The :doc:`foo` tag is auto-generated via automarkup.py. So, use the filename at the sources, instead of :doc:`foo`. Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/17c68b5f1d72488431c77c1de9f13683fe9f536c.1623824363.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- Documentation/x86/boot.rst | 4 ++-- Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'Documentation/x86') diff --git a/Documentation/x86/boot.rst b/Documentation/x86/boot.rst index fc844913dece..894a19897005 100644 --- a/Documentation/x86/boot.rst +++ b/Documentation/x86/boot.rst @@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@ follow:: In addition to read/modify/write the setup header of the struct boot_params as that of 16-bit boot protocol, the boot loader should also fill the additional fields of the struct boot_params as -described in chapter :doc:`zero-page`. +described in chapter Documentation/x86/zero-page.rst. After setting up the struct boot_params, the boot loader can load the 32/64-bit kernel in the same way as that of 16-bit boot protocol. @@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ can be calculated as follows:: In addition to read/modify/write the setup header of the struct boot_params as that of 16-bit boot protocol, the boot loader should also fill the additional fields of the struct boot_params as described -in chapter :doc:`zero-page`. +in chapter Documentation/x86/zero-page.rst. After setting up the struct boot_params, the boot loader can load 64-bit kernel in the same way as that of 16-bit boot protocol, but diff --git a/Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst b/Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst index c5b695d75349..9f0b1851771a 100644 --- a/Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst +++ b/Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ are aligned with platform MTRR setup. If MTRRs are only set up by the platform firmware code though and the OS does not make any specific MTRR mapping requests mtrr_type_lookup() should always return MTRR_TYPE_INVALID. -For details refer to :doc:`pat`. +For details refer to Documentation/x86/pat.rst. .. tip:: On Intel P6 family processors (Pentium Pro, Pentium II and later) -- cgit