From fd0d000b2c34aa43d4e92dcf0dfaeda7e123008a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Richter Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 20:19:08 +0200 Subject: perf: Pass last sampling period to perf_sample_data_init() We always need to pass the last sample period to perf_sample_data_init(), otherwise the event distribution will be wrong. Thus, modifiyng the function interface with the required period as argument. So basically a pattern like this: perf_sample_data_init(&data, ~0ULL); data.period = event->hw.last_period; will now be like that: perf_sample_data_init(&data, ~0ULL, event->hw.last_period); Avoids unininitialized data.period and simplifies code. Signed-off-by: Robert Richter Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1333390758-10893-3-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c') diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c index b78af0cc6ef3..ab627a740fa3 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c @@ -489,8 +489,6 @@ armv6pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num, */ armv6_pmcr_write(pmcr); - perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0); - cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events); for (idx = 0; idx < cpu_pmu->num_events; ++idx) { struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[idx]; @@ -509,7 +507,7 @@ armv6pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num, hwc = &event->hw; armpmu_event_update(event, hwc, idx); - data.period = event->hw.last_period; + perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0, hwc->last_period); if (!armpmu_event_set_period(event, hwc, idx)) continue; -- cgit