From 18d457661fb9fa69352822ab98d39331c3d0e571 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Will Deacon Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:13:22 +0100 Subject: KVM: ARM/arm64: avoid returning negative error code as bool is_valid_cache returns true if the specified cache is valid. Unfortunately, if the parameter passed it out of range, we return -ENOENT, which ends up as true leading to potential hilarity. This patch returns false on the failure path instead. Cc: Christoffer Dall Cc: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall --- arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c') diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c index 37a0fe1bb9bb..7928dbdf2102 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c @@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ static bool is_valid_cache(u32 val) u32 level, ctype; if (val >= CSSELR_MAX) - return -ENOENT; + return false; /* Bottom bit is Instruction or Data bit. Next 3 bits are level. */ level = (val >> 1); -- cgit