From f3fbd7ec62dec1528fb8044034e2885f2b257941 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Masami Hiramatsu Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:03:38 +0900 Subject: arm: kprobes: Allow to handle reentered kprobe on single-stepping This is arm port of commit 6a5022a56ac3 ("kprobes/x86: Allow to handle reentered kprobe on single-stepping") Since the FIQ handlers can interrupt in the single stepping (or preparing the single stepping, do_debug etc.), we should consider a kprobe is hit in the NMI handler. Even in that case, the kprobe is allowed to be reentered as same as the kprobes hit in kprobe handlers (KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE or KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE). The real issue will happen when a kprobe hit while another reentered kprobe is processing (KPROBE_REENTER), because we already consumed a saved-area for the previous kprobe. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst --- arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) (limited to 'arch/arm/probes') diff --git a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c index b6dc9d838a9a..35148b46c4f5 100644 --- a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c +++ b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c @@ -271,6 +271,7 @@ void __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) switch (kcb->kprobe_status) { case KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE: case KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE: + case KPROBE_HIT_SS: /* A pre- or post-handler probe got us here. */ kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(p); save_previous_kprobe(kcb); @@ -279,6 +280,11 @@ void __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) singlestep(p, regs, kcb); restore_previous_kprobe(kcb); break; + case KPROBE_REENTER: + /* A nested probe was hit in FIQ, it is a BUG */ + pr_warn("Unrecoverable kprobe detected at %p.\n", + p->addr); + /* fall through */ default: /* impossible cases */ BUG(); -- cgit