From 18b9dc130c33de2d1fd46bd668e67d0e1a544b16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Will Deacon Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:42:43 +0100 Subject: ARM: vfp: add VFPv4 capability detection and populate elf_hwcap The presence of VFPv4 cannot be detected simply by looking at the FPSID subarchitecture field, as a value >= 2 signifies the architecture as VFPv3 or later. This patch reads from MVFR1 to check whether or not the fused multiply accumulate instructions are supported. Since these are introduced with VFPv4, this tells us what we need to know. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon --- arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c') diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c index f25e7ec89416..650d90be0f9f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c +++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c @@ -582,7 +582,6 @@ static int __init vfp_init(void) elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_VFPv3D16; } #endif -#ifdef CONFIG_NEON /* * Check for the presence of the Advanced SIMD * load/store instructions, integer and single @@ -590,10 +589,13 @@ static int __init vfp_init(void) * for NEON if the hardware has the MVFR registers. */ if ((read_cpuid_id() & 0x000f0000) == 0x000f0000) { +#ifdef CONFIG_NEON if ((fmrx(MVFR1) & 0x000fff00) == 0x00011100) elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_NEON; - } #endif + if ((fmrx(MVFR1) & 0xf0000000) == 0x10000000) + elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_VFPv4; + } } return 0; } -- cgit