From b9bf3121af348d9255f1c917830fe8c2df52efcb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:13:47 +0900 Subject: percpu: use DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED() There are a few places where ___cacheline_aligned* is used with DEFINE_PER_CPU(). Use DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED() instead. DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED() applies alignment only on SMPs. While all other converted places used _in_smp variant or only get compiled for SMP, net/rds used unconditional ____cacheline_aligned. I don't see any reason these data structures should be aligned on UP and thus converted together. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Mike Frysinger Cc: Tony Luck Cc: Andy Grover --- arch/blackfin/mm/sram-alloc.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/blackfin/mm') diff --git a/arch/blackfin/mm/sram-alloc.c b/arch/blackfin/mm/sram-alloc.c index 0bc3c4ef0aad..99e4dbb1dfd1 100644 --- a/arch/blackfin/mm/sram-alloc.c +++ b/arch/blackfin/mm/sram-alloc.c @@ -42,9 +42,9 @@ #include #include "blackfin_sram.h" -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(spinlock_t, l1sram_lock) ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(spinlock_t, l1_data_sram_lock) ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(spinlock_t, l1_inst_sram_lock) ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(spinlock_t, l1sram_lock); +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(spinlock_t, l1_data_sram_lock); +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(spinlock_t, l1_inst_sram_lock); static spinlock_t l2_sram_lock ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; /* the data structure for L1 scratchpad and DATA SRAM */ -- cgit