From 9c0603f487b6b0cfa0b2bbcab7f06333e78db652 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Salter Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:14:00 -0500 Subject: c6x: fix misleading comment A comment in entry.S incorrectly stated that interrupt vectors called __do_IRQ() and that int6 vector was used for syscalls. Both statements are incorrect for the current kernel, so this patch cleans up the wording to reflect current reality. Signed-off-by: Mark Salter --- arch/c6x/kernel/entry.S | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/c6x/kernel') diff --git a/arch/c6x/kernel/entry.S b/arch/c6x/kernel/entry.S index 0c164c2c22be..0ed6157dd256 100644 --- a/arch/c6x/kernel/entry.S +++ b/arch/c6x/kernel/entry.S @@ -429,8 +429,7 @@ ENTRY(ret_from_kernel_execve) ENDPROC(ret_from_kernel_execve) ;; - ;; These are the interrupt handlers, responsible for calling __do_IRQ() - ;; int6 is used for syscalls (see _system_call entry) + ;; These are the interrupt handlers, responsible for calling c6x_do_IRQ() ;; .macro SAVE_ALL_INT SAVE_ALL IRP,ITSR -- cgit