From 58c644ba512cfbc2e39b758dd979edd1d6d00e27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:50:35 +0100 Subject: sched/idle: Fix arch_cpu_idle() vs tracing We call arch_cpu_idle() with RCU disabled, but then use local_irq_{en,dis}able(), which invokes tracing, which relies on RCU. Switch all arch_cpu_idle() implementations to use raw_local_irq_{en,dis}able() and carefully manage the lockdep,rcu,tracing state like we do in entry. (XXX: we really should change arch_cpu_idle() to not return with interrupts enabled) Reported-by: Sven Schnelle Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland Tested-by: Mark Rutland Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120114925.594122626@infradead.org --- arch/ia64/kernel/process.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch/ia64/kernel/process.c') diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c index 6b61a703bcf5..c9ff8796b509 100644 --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ void arch_cpu_idle(void) if (mark_idle) (*mark_idle)(1); - safe_halt(); + raw_safe_halt(); if (mark_idle) (*mark_idle)(0); -- cgit