From 58f80fa56d8b493f52cbec64a86ba61e6cf384f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mike Rapoport Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 11:17:27 +0300 Subject: m68k: mcfmmu: remove stale part of comment about steal_context The comment about steal_context() came from powerpc and a part of it addresses differences between powerpc variants that are not really relevant to m68k. Remove that part of the comment. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer --- arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c') diff --git a/arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c b/arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c index fe1a84891035..a3e7e4e70dd5 100644 --- a/arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c +++ b/arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c @@ -213,11 +213,6 @@ void __init cf_mmu_context_init(void) /* * Steal a context from a task that has one at the moment. - * This is only used on 8xx and 4xx and we presently assume that - * they don't do SMP. If they do then thicfpgalloc.hs will have to check - * whether the MM we steal is in use. - * We also assume that this is only used on systems that don't - * use an MMU hash table - this is true for 8xx and 4xx. * This isn't an LRU system, it just frees up each context in * turn (sort-of pseudo-random replacement :). This would be the * place to implement an LRU scheme if anyone was motivated to do it. -- cgit