From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100
Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
---
 arch/mn10300/kernel/csrc-mn10300.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'arch/mn10300/kernel')

diff --git a/arch/mn10300/kernel/csrc-mn10300.c b/arch/mn10300/kernel/csrc-mn10300.c
index 45644cf18c41..6b74df3661f2 100644
--- a/arch/mn10300/kernel/csrc-mn10300.c
+++ b/arch/mn10300/kernel/csrc-mn10300.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 #include <asm/timex.h>
 #include "internal.h"
 
-static cycle_t mn10300_read(struct clocksource *cs)
+static u64 mn10300_read(struct clocksource *cs)
 {
 	return read_timestamp_counter();
 }
-- 
cgit