From a8a217c22116eff6c120d753c9934089fb229af0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Will Deacon Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 19:25:27 +0100 Subject: locking/core: Remove {read,spin,write}_can_lock() Outside of the locking code itself, {read,spin,write}_can_lock() have no users in tree. Apparmor (the last remaining user of write_can_lock()) got moved over to lockdep by the previous patch. This patch removes the use of {read,spin,write}_can_lock() from the BUILD_LOCK_OPS macro, deferring to the trylock operation for testing the lock status, and subsequently removes the unused macros altogether. They aren't guaranteed to work in a concurrent environment and can give incorrect results in the case of qrwlock. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507055129-12300-2-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/mn10300/include/asm/spinlock.h | 12 ------------ 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/mn10300') diff --git a/arch/mn10300/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/mn10300/include/asm/spinlock.h index fe413b41df6c..54f75dac8094 100644 --- a/arch/mn10300/include/asm/spinlock.h +++ b/arch/mn10300/include/asm/spinlock.h @@ -98,18 +98,6 @@ static inline void arch_spin_lock_flags(arch_spinlock_t *lock, * read-locks. */ -/** - * read_can_lock - would read_trylock() succeed? - * @lock: the rwlock in question. - */ -#define arch_read_can_lock(x) ((int)(x)->lock > 0) - -/** - * write_can_lock - would write_trylock() succeed? - * @lock: the rwlock in question. - */ -#define arch_write_can_lock(x) ((x)->lock == RW_LOCK_BIAS) - /* * On mn10300, we implement read-write locks as a 32-bit counter * with the high bit (sign) being the "contended" bit. -- cgit