From dc88588990945b14d6f7ed45b70ef7b1814a5f3e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 10:26:50 -0500 Subject: [parisc, s390, sparc64] no need for access_ok() in futex handling access_ok() is always true on those Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- arch/parisc/include/asm/futex.h | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/parisc/include/asm/futex.h') diff --git a/arch/parisc/include/asm/futex.h b/arch/parisc/include/asm/futex.h index c10cc9010cc1..c459f656c8c3 100644 --- a/arch/parisc/include/asm/futex.h +++ b/arch/parisc/include/asm/futex.h @@ -39,9 +39,6 @@ arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser(int op, int oparg, int *oval, u32 __user *uaddr) int oldval, ret; u32 tmp; - if (!access_ok(uaddr, sizeof(u32))) - return -EFAULT; - _futex_spin_lock_irqsave(uaddr, &flags); ret = -EFAULT; -- cgit