From 28b4868820a56de661f54742ff91b78e12f1e582 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:39:04 -0700
Subject: x86, boot: use .code16gcc instead of .code16

Use .code16gcc to compile arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S rather than
.code16, since some older versions of binutils can't generate 32-bit
addressing expressions (67 prefixes) in .code16 mode, only in
.code16gcc mode.

Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
---
 arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S')

diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S b/arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S
index 507793739ea5..1dfbf64e52a2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
  * touching registers they shouldn't be.
  */
 
-	.code16
+	.code16gcc
 	.text
 	.globl	intcall
 	.type	intcall, @function
-- 
cgit