From 842bb26a40af52b06a423d58e0d70609a936b162 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tiejun Chen Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:14:38 +0800 Subject: kvm: x86: vmx: remove MMIO_MAX_GEN MMIO_MAX_GEN is the same as MMIO_GEN_MASK. Use only one. Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c') diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c index ac1c4de3a484..4ea0dcb0b21b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c @@ -214,13 +214,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_mmu_set_mmio_spte_mask); #define MMIO_GEN_LOW_SHIFT 10 #define MMIO_GEN_LOW_MASK ((1 << MMIO_GEN_LOW_SHIFT) - 2) #define MMIO_GEN_MASK ((1 << MMIO_GEN_SHIFT) - 1) -#define MMIO_MAX_GEN ((1 << MMIO_GEN_SHIFT) - 1) static u64 generation_mmio_spte_mask(unsigned int gen) { u64 mask; - WARN_ON(gen > MMIO_MAX_GEN); + WARN_ON(gen & ~MMIO_GEN_MASK); mask = (gen & MMIO_GEN_LOW_MASK) << MMIO_SPTE_GEN_LOW_SHIFT; mask |= ((u64)gen >> MMIO_GEN_LOW_SHIFT) << MMIO_SPTE_GEN_HIGH_SHIFT; @@ -263,13 +262,13 @@ static bool is_mmio_spte(u64 spte) static gfn_t get_mmio_spte_gfn(u64 spte) { - u64 mask = generation_mmio_spte_mask(MMIO_MAX_GEN) | shadow_mmio_mask; + u64 mask = generation_mmio_spte_mask(MMIO_GEN_MASK) | shadow_mmio_mask; return (spte & ~mask) >> PAGE_SHIFT; } static unsigned get_mmio_spte_access(u64 spte) { - u64 mask = generation_mmio_spte_mask(MMIO_MAX_GEN) | shadow_mmio_mask; + u64 mask = generation_mmio_spte_mask(MMIO_GEN_MASK) | shadow_mmio_mask; return (spte & ~mask) & ~PAGE_MASK; } -- cgit From bf4bea8e9a9058319a19f8c2710a6f0ef2459983 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ard Biesheuvel Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 08:33:56 +0000 Subject: kvm: fix kvm_is_mmio_pfn() and rename to kvm_is_reserved_pfn() This reverts commit 85c8555ff0 ("KVM: check for !is_zero_pfn() in kvm_is_mmio_pfn()") and renames the function to kvm_is_reserved_pfn. The problem being addressed by the patch above was that some ARM code based the memory mapping attributes of a pfn on the return value of kvm_is_mmio_pfn(), whose name indeed suggests that such pfns should be mapped as device memory. However, kvm_is_mmio_pfn() doesn't do quite what it says on the tin, and the existing non-ARM users were already using it in a way which suggests that its name should probably have been 'kvm_is_reserved_pfn' from the beginning, e.g., whether or not to call get_page/put_page on it etc. This means that returning false for the zero page is a mistake and the patch above should be reverted. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c') diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c index ac1c4de3a484..978f402006ee 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c @@ -630,7 +630,7 @@ static int mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(u64 *sptep) * kvm mmu, before reclaiming the page, we should * unmap it from mmu first. */ - WARN_ON(!kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn) && !page_count(pfn_to_page(pfn))); + WARN_ON(!kvm_is_reserved_pfn(pfn) && !page_count(pfn_to_page(pfn))); if (!shadow_accessed_mask || old_spte & shadow_accessed_mask) kvm_set_pfn_accessed(pfn); @@ -2461,7 +2461,7 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, spte |= PT_PAGE_SIZE_MASK; if (tdp_enabled) spte |= kvm_x86_ops->get_mt_mask(vcpu, gfn, - kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn)); + kvm_is_reserved_pfn(pfn)); if (host_writable) spte |= SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE; @@ -2737,7 +2737,7 @@ static void transparent_hugepage_adjust(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, * PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL and there would be no adjustment done * here. */ - if (!is_error_noslot_pfn(pfn) && !kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn) && + if (!is_error_noslot_pfn(pfn) && !kvm_is_reserved_pfn(pfn) && level == PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL && PageTransCompound(pfn_to_page(pfn)) && !has_wrprotected_page(vcpu->kvm, gfn, PT_DIRECTORY_LEVEL)) { -- cgit