From df24014abe3694e7c34ce5e50248611b7a93fe83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 15:03:58 +0530 Subject: cpufreq: Call transition notifier only once for each policy Currently, the notifiers are called once for each CPU of the policy->cpus cpumask. It would be more optimal if the notifier can be called only once and all the relevant information be provided to it. Out of the 23 drivers that register for the transition notifiers today, only 4 of them do per-cpu updates and the callback for the rest can be called only once for the policy without any impact. This would also avoid multiple function calls to the notifier callbacks and reduce multiple iterations of notifier core's code (which does locking as well). This patch adds pointer to the cpufreq policy to the struct cpufreq_freqs, so the notifier callback has all the information available to it with a single call. The five drivers which perform per-cpu updates are updated to use the cpufreq policy. The freqs->cpu field is redundant now and is removed. Acked-by: David S. Miller (sparc) Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/kvm/x86.c') diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index b5edc8e3ce1d..22cc90baa67f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -6698,10 +6698,8 @@ static void kvm_hyperv_tsc_notifier(void) } #endif -static int kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, - void *data) +static void __kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(struct cpufreq_freqs *freq, int cpu) { - struct cpufreq_freqs *freq = data; struct kvm *kvm; struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; int i, send_ipi = 0; @@ -6745,17 +6743,12 @@ static int kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long va * */ - if (val == CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE && freq->old > freq->new) - return 0; - if (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && freq->old < freq->new) - return 0; - - smp_call_function_single(freq->cpu, tsc_khz_changed, freq, 1); + smp_call_function_single(cpu, tsc_khz_changed, freq, 1); spin_lock(&kvm_lock); list_for_each_entry(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list) { kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) { - if (vcpu->cpu != freq->cpu) + if (vcpu->cpu != cpu) continue; kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu); if (vcpu->cpu != smp_processor_id()) @@ -6777,8 +6770,24 @@ static int kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long va * guest context is entered kvmclock will be updated, * so the guest will not see stale values. */ - smp_call_function_single(freq->cpu, tsc_khz_changed, freq, 1); + smp_call_function_single(cpu, tsc_khz_changed, freq, 1); } +} + +static int kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, + void *data) +{ + struct cpufreq_freqs *freq = data; + int cpu; + + if (val == CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE && freq->old > freq->new) + return 0; + if (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && freq->old < freq->new) + return 0; + + for_each_cpu(cpu, freq->policy->cpus) + __kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(freq, cpu); + return 0; } -- cgit