From 1f5026a7e21e409c2b9dd54f6dfb9446511fb7c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:58:09 +0200
Subject: memblock: Kill MEMBLOCK_ERROR
25818f0f28 (memblock: Make MEMBLOCK_ERROR be 0) thankfully made
MEMBLOCK_ERROR 0 and there already are codes which expect error return
to be 0. There's no point in keeping MEMBLOCK_ERROR around. End its
misery.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310457490-3356-6-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/mm/memblock.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
(limited to 'arch/x86/mm/memblock.c')
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
index 992da5ec5a64..e126117d1b03 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ u64 __init memblock_x86_find_in_range_size(u64 start, u64 *sizep, u64 align)
return addr;
}
- return MEMBLOCK_ERROR;
+ return 0;
}
static __init struct range *find_range_array(int count)
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static __init struct range *find_range_array(int count)
end = memblock.current_limit;
mem = memblock_find_in_range(0, end, size, sizeof(struct range));
- if (mem == MEMBLOCK_ERROR)
+ if (!mem)
panic("can not find more space for range array");
/*
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ u64 __init memblock_x86_find_in_range_node(int nid, u64 start, u64 end, u64 size
{
u64 addr;
addr = find_memory_core_early(nid, size, align, start, end);
- if (addr != MEMBLOCK_ERROR)
+ if (addr)
return addr;
/* Fallback, should already have start end within node range */
--
cgit