From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- arch/xtensa/kernel/time.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/xtensa/kernel') diff --git a/arch/xtensa/kernel/time.c b/arch/xtensa/kernel/time.c index be81e69b25bc..668c1056f9e4 100644 --- a/arch/xtensa/kernel/time.c +++ b/arch/xtensa/kernel/time.c @@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ unsigned long ccount_freq; /* ccount Hz */ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ccount_freq); -static cycle_t ccount_read(struct clocksource *cs) +static u64 ccount_read(struct clocksource *cs) { - return (cycle_t)get_ccount(); + return (u64)get_ccount(); } static u64 notrace ccount_sched_clock_read(void) -- cgit