From b987ffc18fb3b3b76b059aa9e372dbee26f7c4f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 14:26:53 +0100 Subject: x86/qspinlock: Fix compile error With a compiler that has asm-goto but not asm-cc-output and CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES=y we get a compiler error: arch/x86/include/asm/rmwcc.h:23:17: error: jump into statement expression Fix this by writing the if() as a boolean multiplication instead. Reported-by: kbuild test robot Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Will Deacon Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 7aa54be29765 ("locking/qspinlock, x86: Provide liveness guarantee") Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch') diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h index 87623c6b13db..bd5ac6cc37db 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h @@ -13,12 +13,15 @@ #define queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire static __always_inline u32 queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire(struct qspinlock *lock) { - u32 val = 0; - - if (GEN_BINARY_RMWcc(LOCK_PREFIX "btsl", lock->val.counter, c, - "I", _Q_PENDING_OFFSET)) - val |= _Q_PENDING_VAL; + u32 val; + /* + * We can't use GEN_BINARY_RMWcc() inside an if() stmt because asm goto + * and CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES=y results in a label inside a + * statement expression, which GCC doesn't like. + */ + val = GEN_BINARY_RMWcc(LOCK_PREFIX "btsl", lock->val.counter, c, + "I", _Q_PENDING_OFFSET) * _Q_PENDING_VAL; val |= atomic_read(&lock->val) & ~_Q_PENDING_MASK; return val; -- cgit