From e63a57303599b17290cd8bc48e6f20b24289a8bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ming Lei Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 10:35:24 +0800 Subject: blk-cgroup: bypass blkcg_deactivate_policy after destroying blkcg_deactivate_policy() can be called after blkg_destroy_all() returns, and it isn't necessary since blkg_destroy_all has covered policy deactivation. Signed-off-by: Ming Lei Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231117023527.3188627-4-ming.lei@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/blk-cgroup.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) (limited to 'block') diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c index 4a42ea2972ad..4b48c2c44098 100644 --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c @@ -577,6 +577,7 @@ static void blkg_destroy_all(struct gendisk *disk) struct request_queue *q = disk->queue; struct blkcg_gq *blkg, *n; int count = BLKG_DESTROY_BATCH_SIZE; + int i; restart: spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock); @@ -602,6 +603,18 @@ restart: } } + /* + * Mark policy deactivated since policy offline has been done, and + * the free is scheduled, so future blkcg_deactivate_policy() can + * be bypassed + */ + for (i = 0; i < BLKCG_MAX_POLS; i++) { + struct blkcg_policy *pol = blkcg_policy[i]; + + if (pol) + __clear_bit(pol->plid, q->blkcg_pols); + } + q->root_blkg = NULL; spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock); } -- cgit