From d21c95c569c462da20d491b75d0a45bd70ddc1bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Corbet Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 13:40:30 -0600 Subject: Add "no BKL needed" comments to several drivers This documents the fact that somebody looked at the relevant open() functions and concluded that, due to their trivial nature, no locking was needed. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- drivers/char/scx200_gpio.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'drivers/char/scx200_gpio.c') diff --git a/drivers/char/scx200_gpio.c b/drivers/char/scx200_gpio.c index 99e5272e3c53..be2c623a9862 100644 --- a/drivers/char/scx200_gpio.c +++ b/drivers/char/scx200_gpio.c @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct nsc_gpio_ops scx200_gpio_ops = { }; EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scx200_gpio_ops); +/* No BKL needed here: no global resources used */ static int scx200_gpio_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) { unsigned m = iminor(inode); -- cgit