From 68069b0d458bb06541641a294c15e06c5704ec2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Manivannan Sadhasivam Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 13:02:50 +0530 Subject: cpufreq: qcom-hw: Remove un-necessary cpumask_empty() check CPUFreq core will always set the "policy->cpus" bitmask with the bitfield of the CPU that goes first per domain/policy. So there is no way the "policy->cpus" bitmask will be empty during qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(). Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq') diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c index 833589bc95e4..61850d75e82f 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c @@ -566,11 +566,6 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) data->per_core_dcvs = true; qcom_get_related_cpus(index, policy->cpus); - if (cpumask_empty(policy->cpus)) { - dev_err(dev, "Domain-%d failed to get related CPUs\n", index); - ret = -ENOENT; - goto error; - } policy->driver_data = data; policy->dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu = true; -- cgit