From 772ae99c5b414fc7f5e4cf76beae7003196b5526 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wolfram Sang Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:01:59 +0200 Subject: i2c: eg20t: pass on return value in i2c_xfer smatch says: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-eg20t.c:702 pch_i2c_xfer() info: why not propagate 'ret' from mutex_lock_interruptible() instead of -512? which is especially true since for -ENORESTARTSYS it is said in linux/errno.h "signal_pending() MUST be set" which is not done here. So just pass on the return value we got. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang Cc: Tomoya MORINAGA --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-eg20t.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-eg20t.c') diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-eg20t.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-eg20t.c index 6e9e0759f7df..93926a73f043 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-eg20t.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-eg20t.c @@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ static s32 pch_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *i2c_adap, ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&pch_mutex); if (ret) - return -ERESTARTSYS; + return ret; if (adap->p_adapter_info->pch_i2c_suspended) { mutex_unlock(&pch_mutex); -- cgit