From c2bebe37c6b686817f795b6b63599ed4472775fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Edward Cree Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 17:42:28 +0100 Subject: sfc: give ef10 its own rwsem in the filter table instead of filter_lock efx->filter_lock remains in place for use on farch, but EF10 now ignores it. EFX_EF10_FILTER_FLAG_BUSY is no longer needed, hence it is removed. Signed-off-by: Edward Cree Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c') diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c index 0be93abdb2ad..cb9273016916 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c @@ -1783,7 +1783,6 @@ static int efx_probe_filters(struct efx_nic *efx) { int rc; - spin_lock_init(&efx->filter_lock); init_rwsem(&efx->filter_sem); mutex_lock(&efx->mac_lock); down_write(&efx->filter_sem); -- cgit