From dae2e9f430c46c29e3f771110094bd3da3625aa4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Pradeep A. Dalvi" Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 11:16:13 +0000 Subject: netdev: ethernet dev_alloc_skb to netdev_alloc_skb Replaced deprecating dev_alloc_skb with netdev_alloc_skb in drivers/net/ethernet - Removed extra skb->dev = dev after netdev_alloc_skb Signed-off-by: Pradeep A Dalvi Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- drivers/net/ethernet/sis/sis900.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/net/ethernet/sis') diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sis/sis900.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sis/sis900.c index 91c44688bc3e..f968898c86db 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sis/sis900.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sis/sis900.c @@ -1166,7 +1166,7 @@ sis900_init_rx_ring(struct net_device *net_dev) for (i = 0; i < NUM_RX_DESC; i++) { struct sk_buff *skb; - if ((skb = dev_alloc_skb(RX_BUF_SIZE)) == NULL) { + if ((skb = netdev_alloc_skb(net_dev, RX_BUF_SIZE)) == NULL) { /* not enough memory for skbuff, this makes a "hole" on the buffer ring, it is not clear how the hardware will react to this kind of degenerated @@ -1769,7 +1769,7 @@ static int sis900_rx(struct net_device *net_dev) /* refill the Rx buffer, what if there is not enough * memory for new socket buffer ?? */ - if ((skb = dev_alloc_skb(RX_BUF_SIZE)) == NULL) { + if ((skb = netdev_alloc_skb(net_dev, RX_BUF_SIZE)) == NULL) { /* * Not enough memory to refill the buffer * so we need to recycle the old one so @@ -1827,7 +1827,7 @@ refill_rx_ring: entry = sis_priv->dirty_rx % NUM_RX_DESC; if (sis_priv->rx_skbuff[entry] == NULL) { - if ((skb = dev_alloc_skb(RX_BUF_SIZE)) == NULL) { + if ((skb = netdev_alloc_skb(net_dev, RX_BUF_SIZE)) == NULL) { /* not enough memory for skbuff, this makes a * "hole" on the buffer ring, it is not clear * how the hardware will react to this kind -- cgit