From f25c418dcad93755cf48537d60a46070112be72c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Grumbach Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:48:10 +0300 Subject: iwlwifi: remove antenna_coupling module parameter This module parameter should not be mangled by users. This relates to a very old driver and I doubt people can really check the antenna coupling in a way that would make the BT Coexistence work better with a real value. Drop it. Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20200424182644.6e566897ce0a.I8395a50c1c39522e542366064bff33a33009ce7b@changeid --- drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c | 11 +---------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c') diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c index dac809df7f1d..4fa4eab2d7f3 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ /****************************************************************************** * * Copyright(c) 2005 - 2014 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. + * Copyright (C) 2019 - 2020 Intel Corporation * * Contact Information: * Intel Linux Wireless @@ -846,16 +847,6 @@ static void rs_bt_update_lq(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_rxon_context *ctx, struct iwl_scale_tbl_info *tbl; bool full_concurrent = priv->bt_full_concurrent; - if (priv->bt_ant_couple_ok) { - /* - * Is there a need to switch between - * full concurrency and 3-wire? - */ - if (priv->bt_ci_compliance) - full_concurrent = true; - else - full_concurrent = false; - } if ((priv->bt_traffic_load != priv->last_bt_traffic_load) || (priv->bt_full_concurrent != full_concurrent)) { priv->bt_full_concurrent = full_concurrent; -- cgit