From d21c95c569c462da20d491b75d0a45bd70ddc1bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Corbet Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 13:40:30 -0600 Subject: Add "no BKL needed" comments to several drivers This documents the fact that somebody looked at the relevant open() functions and concluded that, due to their trivial nature, no locking was needed. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- drivers/scsi/3w-xxxx.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) (limited to 'drivers/scsi/3w-xxxx.c') diff --git a/drivers/scsi/3w-xxxx.c b/drivers/scsi/3w-xxxx.c index 8c22329aa85e..bbff029536ea 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/3w-xxxx.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/3w-xxxx.c @@ -1027,6 +1027,8 @@ out: } /* End tw_chrdev_ioctl() */ /* This function handles open for the character device */ +/* NOTE that this function races with remove - adding BKL + won't help */ static int tw_chrdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) { unsigned int minor_number; -- cgit