From ab9b3de70199f7479e251c30128b30b5559c97b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wei Yongjun Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 17:54:22 +0000 Subject: slimbus: Use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC. Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/slimbus/messaging.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/slimbus') diff --git a/drivers/slimbus/messaging.c b/drivers/slimbus/messaging.c index 8b2c77f516b9..a9a6dc4af0da 100644 --- a/drivers/slimbus/messaging.c +++ b/drivers/slimbus/messaging.c @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ int slim_do_transfer(struct slim_controller *ctrl, struct slim_msg_txn *txn) if (need_tid) { spin_lock_irqsave(&ctrl->txn_lock, flags); tid = idr_alloc(&ctrl->tid_idr, txn, 0, - SLIM_MAX_TIDS, GFP_KERNEL); + SLIM_MAX_TIDS, GFP_ATOMIC); txn->tid = tid; if (!txn->msg->comp) -- cgit