From d7dba6be0f31ae61f5f3296aa130f45d57d30f74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 13:07:36 +0200 Subject: dmaengine: dw: Remove misleading is_private property The commit a9ddb575d6d6 ("dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support") introduces is_private property in uncertain understanding what does it mean. First of all, documentation defines DMA_PRIVATE capability as Documentation/crypto/async-tx-api.txt: The DMA_PRIVATE capability flag is used to tag dma devices that should not be used by the general-purpose allocator. It can be set at initialization time if it is known that a channel will always be private. Alternatively, it is set when dma_request_channel() finds an unused "public" channel. A couple caveats to note when implementing a driver and consumer: 1/ Once a channel has been privately allocated it will no longer be considered by the general-purpose allocator even after a call to dma_release_channel(). 2/ Since capabilities are specified at the device level a dma_device with multiple channels will either have all channels public, or all channels private. Documentation/driver-api/dmaengine/provider.rst: - DMA_PRIVATE The devices only supports slave transfers, and as such isn't available for async transfers. The capability had been introduced by the commit 59b5ec21446b ("dmaengine: introduce dma_request_channel and private channels") and some code didn't changed from that times ever. Taking into consideration above and the fact that on all known platforms Synopsys DesignWare DMA engine is attached to serve slave transfers, the DMA_PRIVATE capability must be enabled for this device unconditionally. Otherwise, as rightfully noticed in drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c: /* * Without DMA_PRIVATE the driver is not able to allocate more than * one channel, second allocation fails in private_candidate. */ because of of a caveats mentioned in above documentation excerpts. So, remove conditional around DMA_PRIVATE followed by removal leftovers. If someone wonders, DMA_PRIVATE can be not used if and only if the all channels of the DMA controller are supposed to serve memory-to-memory like operations. For example, EP93xx has two controllers, one of which can only perform memory-to-memory transfers Note, this change doesn't affect dmatest to be able to test such controllers. Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman (maintainer:SERIAL DRIVERS) Cc: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul --- drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_lpss.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/tty') diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_lpss.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_lpss.c index 98dbc796353f..53ca9ba6ab4b 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_lpss.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_lpss.c @@ -153,7 +153,6 @@ static int byt_serial_setup(struct lpss8250 *lpss, struct uart_port *port) #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_DMA static const struct dw_dma_platform_data qrk_serial_dma_pdata = { .nr_channels = 2, - .is_private = true, .chan_allocation_order = CHAN_ALLOCATION_ASCENDING, .chan_priority = CHAN_PRIORITY_ASCENDING, .block_size = 4095, -- cgit