From 3d8765d4f52a0050343bfa99a1a2aa5ef7d841e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 13:51:22 -0500 Subject: xen/pvcalls-front: mark expected switch fall-through In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case I placed the "fall through" comment on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky --- drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/xen') diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c index 0c1ec6894cc4..ed94ea0b4b8e 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c +++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c @@ -1250,7 +1250,8 @@ static void pvcalls_front_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev, case XenbusStateClosed: if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed) break; - /* Missed the backend's CLOSING state -- fallthrough */ + /* Missed the backend's CLOSING state */ + /* fall through */ case XenbusStateClosing: xenbus_frontend_closed(dev); break; -- cgit