From 4e8313e53c83d11510b9f323861a6f83757529ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 11:13:48 +0000 Subject: btrfs: simplify variables in btrfs_block_rsv_refill() At btrfs_block_rsv_refill(), there's no point in initializing the 'num_bytes' variable to 0 and then, after taking the block reserve's spinlock, initializing it to the value of the 'min_reserved' parameter. So just get rid of the 'num_bytes' local variable and rename the 'min_reserved' parameter to 'num_bytes'. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c b/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c index 364a3d11bf88..90b8088e8fac 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c @@ -242,17 +242,15 @@ int btrfs_block_rsv_check(struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv, int min_percent) } int btrfs_block_rsv_refill(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, - struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv, u64 min_reserved, + struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv, u64 num_bytes, enum btrfs_reserve_flush_enum flush) { - u64 num_bytes = 0; int ret = -ENOSPC; if (!block_rsv) return 0; spin_lock(&block_rsv->lock); - num_bytes = min_reserved; if (block_rsv->reserved >= num_bytes) ret = 0; else -- cgit