From 54886a7153353ea2bf21ebfc1b8e030e71d151d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Opdenacker Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:08:35 -0800 Subject: cramfs: mark as obsolete Who needs cramfs when you have squashfs? At least, we should warn people that cramfs is obsolete. Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- fs/cramfs/Kconfig | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/cramfs/Kconfig') diff --git a/fs/cramfs/Kconfig b/fs/cramfs/Kconfig index cd06466f365e..11b29d491b7c 100644 --- a/fs/cramfs/Kconfig +++ b/fs/cramfs/Kconfig @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ config CRAMFS - tristate "Compressed ROM file system support (cramfs)" + tristate "Compressed ROM file system support (cramfs) (OBSOLETE)" depends on BLOCK select ZLIB_INFLATE help @@ -16,4 +16,7 @@ config CRAMFS cramfs. Note that the root file system (the one containing the directory /) cannot be compiled as a module. + This filesystem is obsoleted by SquashFS, which is much better + in terms of performance and features. + If unsure, say N. -- cgit