From 537632e0a54a5355cdd0330911d18c3b773f9cf7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Boaz Harrosh Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:27:13 +0300 Subject: ore: Unlock r4w pages in exact reverse order of locking The read-4-write pages are locked in address ascending order. But where unlocked in a way easiest for coding. Fix that, locks should be released in opposite order of locking, .i.e descending address order. I have not hit this dead-lock. It was found by inspecting the dbug print-outs. I suspect there is an higher lock at caller that protects us, but fix it regardless. Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh --- fs/exofs/ore_raid.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/exofs/ore_raid.c') diff --git a/fs/exofs/ore_raid.c b/fs/exofs/ore_raid.c index fff2070c6751..5f376d14fdcc 100644 --- a/fs/exofs/ore_raid.c +++ b/fs/exofs/ore_raid.c @@ -144,26 +144,26 @@ static void _sp2d_reset(struct __stripe_pages_2d *sp2d, { unsigned data_devs = sp2d->data_devs; unsigned group_width = data_devs + sp2d->parity; - unsigned p; + int p, c; if (!sp2d->needed) return; - for (p = 0; p < sp2d->pages_in_unit; p++) { - struct __1_page_stripe *_1ps = &sp2d->_1p_stripes[p]; - - if (_1ps->write_count < group_width) { - unsigned c; + for (c = data_devs - 1; c >= 0; --c) + for (p = sp2d->pages_in_unit - 1; p >= 0; --p) { + struct __1_page_stripe *_1ps = &sp2d->_1p_stripes[p]; - for (c = 0; c < data_devs; c++) - if (_1ps->page_is_read[c]) { - struct page *page = _1ps->pages[c]; + if (_1ps->page_is_read[c]) { + struct page *page = _1ps->pages[c]; - r4w->put_page(priv, page); - _1ps->page_is_read[c] = false; - } + r4w->put_page(priv, page); + _1ps->page_is_read[c] = false; + } } + for (p = 0; p < sp2d->pages_in_unit; p++) { + struct __1_page_stripe *_1ps = &sp2d->_1p_stripes[p]; + memset(_1ps->pages, 0, group_width * sizeof(*_1ps->pages)); _1ps->write_count = 0; _1ps->tx = NULL; -- cgit