From ee314a870e402f4e63b8a651bc96c740ed69cb31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 16:26:08 +0200 Subject: fuse: abort: no fc->lock needed for request ending In fuse_abort_conn() when all requests are on private lists we no longer need fc->lock protection. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant --- fs/fuse/dev.c | 14 +++++--------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/fuse/dev.c') diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c index fa53e5e9261a..dcfc87172a47 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c @@ -2072,8 +2072,6 @@ static unsigned fuse_dev_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait) * This function releases and reacquires fc->lock */ static void end_requests(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct list_head *head) -__releases(fc->lock) -__acquires(fc->lock) { while (!list_empty(head)) { struct fuse_req *req; @@ -2082,9 +2080,7 @@ __acquires(fc->lock) clear_bit(FR_PENDING, &req->flags); clear_bit(FR_SENT, &req->flags); list_del_init(&req->list); - spin_unlock(&fc->lock); request_end(fc, req); - spin_lock(&fc->lock); } } @@ -2160,20 +2156,20 @@ void fuse_abort_conn(struct fuse_conn *fc) wake_up_all_locked(&fiq->waitq); spin_unlock(&fiq->waitq.lock); kill_fasync(&fiq->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN); + end_polls(fc); + wake_up_all(&fc->blocked_waitq); + spin_unlock(&fc->lock); while (!list_empty(&to_end1)) { req = list_first_entry(&to_end1, struct fuse_req, list); __fuse_get_request(req); list_del_init(&req->list); - spin_unlock(&fc->lock); request_end(fc, req); - spin_lock(&fc->lock); } end_requests(fc, &to_end2); - end_polls(fc); - wake_up_all(&fc->blocked_waitq); + } else { + spin_unlock(&fc->lock); } - spin_unlock(&fc->lock); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fuse_abort_conn); -- cgit