From 4f6563677ae833baad8003e14353241bc25da4fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Benjamin Coddington Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 13:38:14 -0400 Subject: Move locks API users to locks_lock_inode_wait() Instead of having users check for FL_POSIX or FL_FLOCK to call the correct locks API function, use the check within locks_lock_inode_wait(). This allows for some later cleanup. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/fuse/file.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/fuse/file.c') diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c index f523f2f04c19..e0faf8f2c868 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/file.c +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c @@ -2189,7 +2189,7 @@ static int fuse_file_flock(struct file *file, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl) int err; if (fc->no_flock) { - err = flock_lock_file_wait(file, fl); + err = locks_lock_file_wait(file, fl); } else { struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data; -- cgit