From cb03f94ffb070b13bc0fa58b4ef4fdb558418d27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: NeilBrown Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:04:08 +1100 Subject: fs/locks: merge posix_unblock_lock() and locks_delete_block() posix_unblock_lock() is not specific to posix locks, and behaves nearly identically to locks_delete_block() - the former returning a status while the later doesn't. So discard posix_unblock_lock() and use locks_delete_block() instead, after giving that function an appropriate return value. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/lockd/svclock.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/lockd') diff --git a/fs/lockd/svclock.c b/fs/lockd/svclock.c index 74330daeab71..ea719cdd6a36 100644 --- a/fs/lockd/svclock.c +++ b/fs/lockd/svclock.c @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static int nlmsvc_unlink_block(struct nlm_block *block) dprintk("lockd: unlinking block %p...\n", block); /* Remove block from list */ - status = posix_unblock_lock(&block->b_call->a_args.lock.fl); + status = locks_delete_block(&block->b_call->a_args.lock.fl); nlmsvc_remove_block(block); return status; } -- cgit