From cae80b305e1c3944746dd93e33e9b2ccd5a490c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Layton Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 09:04:04 -0400 Subject: locks: change lm_get_owner and lm_put_owner prototypes The current prototypes for these operations are somewhat awkward as they deal with fl_owners but take struct file_lock arguments. In the future, we'll want to be able to take references without necessarily dealing with a struct file_lock. Change them to take fl_owner_t arguments instead and have the callers deal with assigning the values to the file_lock structs. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/locks.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/locks.c') diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c index 54a79883a7f9..3ebaafb4c587 100644 --- a/fs/locks.c +++ b/fs/locks.c @@ -276,8 +276,10 @@ void locks_release_private(struct file_lock *fl) } if (fl->fl_lmops) { - if (fl->fl_lmops->lm_put_owner) - fl->fl_lmops->lm_put_owner(fl); + if (fl->fl_lmops->lm_put_owner) { + fl->fl_lmops->lm_put_owner(fl->fl_owner); + fl->fl_owner = NULL; + } fl->fl_lmops = NULL; } } @@ -333,7 +335,7 @@ void locks_copy_conflock(struct file_lock *new, struct file_lock *fl) if (fl->fl_lmops) { if (fl->fl_lmops->lm_get_owner) - fl->fl_lmops->lm_get_owner(new, fl); + fl->fl_lmops->lm_get_owner(fl->fl_owner); } } EXPORT_SYMBOL(locks_copy_conflock); -- cgit